How to Use the Socratic Method (for Dialogue, Debate and Critical Thinking)

preview_player
Показать описание
The Socratic Method is a process of dialogue, based on questioning, that inspires critical thinking and analysis.

Primarily the method was designed for moral and philosophical enquiry, but the technique can be used in almost any discussion.

It helps to structure constructive and even challenging conversations without descending into argument or pure rhetoric.

This video explains the 5 steps to follow to have a Socratic dialogue. If you want to find out more then go to the website at:

Video and narration: Simon Ash

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

If you're debating someone in front of an audience then this works well because even if they remain in denial, then atleast the audience will be able to tell you're winning. But a one on one conversation with someone who stays in denial cant be won.

hankschrader
Автор

I've been practicing this method throughout my life, and it proved helpful when I needed to solve conflicts within a group or a workspace, to improve teamwork. Although, people rarely have patience to go through even one cycle, and prefer to get away from the conversation somehow, even when they initiated it themselves. The method is simple, but applying it takes mastery.

ReynWeird
Автор

Love the statement that he made „strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss event, weak minds discuss people“ since I can see that within the people around me and what they talk about

selina
Автор

Wow! I understand why Socrates is regarded as a great thinker. He didn't bother with trying to win an argument or discussion, he was trying to find the truth. That is why he could drill down into what people were saying without getting them angry or resulting in an argument.

HHHGeorge
Автор

This is way better than the modern application of the Socratic Method, where a Professor will show up to class unprepared and then just relentlessly question, humiliate, and bully their students, rather than teach them anything.

uberhorsey
Автор

Hii I'm from 🇮🇳 india
This method is very good
I will try this method

imuselessfellow
Автор

I doubt even the great Socrates himself could win a debate with my mom. The Queen of stubborn!

cherilynnfisher
Автор

This was a nice succinct summary - I was looking for something like this in teaching high school students how to generate ideas and refine their thinking

teachthink
Автор

This is something people could benefit from applying to themselves, with their own ideas. Then of course more benefit comes from other points of view to provide more questions that you haven’t thought of.

hendrixgryspeerdt
Автор

Hank made an extremely important fact that it is necessary to win a debate if more than one person is present as their own interpretation of what is being argue is not tainted by their self-interest on the subject rather, they become an objective observer to determine for themselves which of the two arguments are valid or has more facts to back the subject that is being argued.

h.m.sanchez
Автор

Short, simple & practical. Thank you :)

g.elizabeth___
Автор

"Why do you who are a citizen of the great and mighty and wise city of Athens, care so much about laying up the greatest amount of money and honor and reputation, and so little about wisdom and truth and the greatest improvement of the soul, which you never regard or heed at all? Are you not ashamed of this?"
-Socrates,
Final words to the court before being forced to drink hemlock tea for ultimately acknowledging a singular authority over the order of things and being accused of messing with the minds of the youth. . .
That is why he was killed. .

Ancient_Man_In_Modern_World
Автор

The video Chapters are inconsistent with the numbers and titles in the video.

derekeano
Автор

The real difficulty is using this with people who are not engaged.

-Subtle-
Автор

How can only receiving and interpreting others point again and again enable me win that convo

johnedward
Автор

Belief completely short-circuts this formula into feedback destruction.

natemullikin
Автор

5. why would they have a new viewpoint?
them having a new viewpoint is a stretchy assumption.

edmis
Автор

Is ‘why are you so stupid’ a valid why question?

noname-pzkb
Автор

It is easier if you explain with an example!!!

kallanaBr
Автор

Receive
Reflect
Refine
Restate
Repeat

TheLouvel