Why Philosophers Hate Ayn Rand - EXPLAINED

preview_player
Показать описание
This video was created by Christian Jackson. Taken from Yaron Brook Interviews: Your Happiness = Your Responsibility Recorded by the Scottish Libertarians in Edinburgh, Scotland on February 10, 2020.

#AynRand #Objectivism #Philosophy



Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Altruism is the "sacred cow" of humanity. Ayn Rand destroys such sacred cows.

zachjones
Автор

this guys pupils are larger than the universe

xapemanx
Автор

Mises spent a lot of pages on philosophy before getting into praxeology in Human Action.

nopara
Автор

"Dense, philosophical bs kinda language that they use" ... Wat a choice of words

asstatedbelow
Автор

Thank you for tackling this important topic! It's important that rather than let academic gatekeepers decide for us, we read Ayn Rand for ourselves and come to our own evaluations.

legendre
Автор

Rands theory of epistomology is what makes objectivism unique.

bahavaz
Автор

1:35 100% I have a degree in psychology where I took child psychology. When i read ITOE everything clicked perfectly into place.

ExistenceUniversity
Автор

Objectivism was laughed out of the building from Nietzsche to Tolstoy 50 years before she got to it. It’s nonsense.

boomertears
Автор

The fact he believes that Rand originated the idea of the non aggression principle and thinks libertians stole it should tell you everything you need to know about the intellectual curiosity of this man.

jeremyhansen
Автор

He didn’t explain why philosophers hate her at all, just described his view of her merits. Titles like this are so frustrating.

LowIQLabRat
Автор

Philosophers don't like her because her conclusions are incoherent and she constantly plays with definitions.

InitialFailure
Автор

This video wasn’t created by Christian Jackson. John Matheson filmed and edited it. Christian Jackson I presume is the guy who cut the Ayn Rand clip on the end. Brook was someone I had long admired and meeting him for this shoot was a real honour. I had ten minutes to set this up in a tiny room at Ed Uni. Mr Brook patiently waited and didn’t put any pressure on me while I rushed. After the interview he spent time chatting with us before heading to a 90minute lecture/ q and a. What an impressive and admirable guy - a great ambassador for an ethical philosophy and I was proud to meet him.

jenniferfranklin
Автор

The main reason why AR has been ignored by the "serious academy philosophers" is the simplest fact we could ever imagine - she was a WOMAN. Show me at least one serious philosopher-woman who pretended to examine all men's ideas throughout the history of thinking?

TyyylerDurden
Автор

Sorry honeys . I cant live without a heart .

lavendersprig
Автор

Whats the objectivist point of view on fire fighters and the CDC.. especially around corona virus?

JonathanLevinTKY
Автор

Not an expert but let me pretend to be one....next!

sansocie
Автор

Rand was for reason.
There are few good philosophers, like Leonard Peikoff, George Gale, Helena Cronin, Ruth Milikan, George H. Smith, John Mackie, Paul Kurtz, Ned Block, Andy Clark, Patricia Churchland, Hilary Putnam, Gilbert Ryle and Daniel Dennett.

science
Автор

Bruh she is not unique. She took one of Kant’s categorical imperative for her own and did not give him credit for it.

antonioarriaga
Автор

Ah, man, this is an embarrassment to the concept of philosophy

somnambulist
Автор

I thought this was satire at first. And then I realized it was 100% serious...

ashercaplan