Why Kant is Wrong

preview_player
Показать описание


*****
Subscribe to ARI’s YouTube channel to make sure you never miss a video:
Download or stream free courses on Ayn Rand’s works and ideas with the Ayn Rand University app:

******

******

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Leave it to Rand to be the most precisely wrong she can possibly be.

gg
Автор

I read the CPR twice, and found not one shred of evidence that Rand was correct in her Kant criticism.

Mal
Автор

I'm no Kant expert, but even I know that's wrong.

Caleb
Автор

Wtf is she criticizing Berkeley or Kant? 😂

SeanAnthony-jf
Автор

Ayn Rand has always seemed pretentious and insufferable

thememeslinger
Автор

Wow. Leave it to Rand to completely misunderstand Kant. I suspect she’s never actually engaged with the Kantians of her time, i.e. Sellars.

SellarsJones
Автор

Kant's philosophy does not falsify objects of experience. It merely relegates the relevancy and application of the categories of true and false to experience.

IndustrialMilitia
Автор

Lol. She obviously lacks a basic understanding of Kantian ethics.

ConcreteJungleSickness
Автор

Its since been PROVEN that our perception of any 1 thing is incredibly skewed by our own mental

Che-rua
Автор

WTF she didn't read the Critique of Pure Reason

jacopocapasso
Автор

A whole 43 seconds of nothing but an appeal to emotion

nikoizmus
Автор

Analytic thought wiring that emerges into continental deconstruction of a subject - as per our discussion, will not agree; therefore is not hospitable, but we have a priori something else wired into the brain to make sense of conditional perception in the mind of alterity in process perception of words and reality formation - regardless of the mind of alterity - the process of sense psychology then, effectively decenters objects to be analyzed improperly in the mind of subjects through language and practices that use a specific formula for self-positing alterity within' the content, independently of the idealism of the other in order to deconstruct them to constantly shape-shifting reality, reducing elements of our system to achieve a difference in perception as a totality of existence within a demographic organization of a cognitive bias of being towards a trancdental formula of thought in being of being towards something that others as well as the something others. The continental deconstruction is affected and oriented towards the alterity of the subject being analyzed through the ontological existence of the ready-at-hand. He just leaves the inversion on, he is an ontological of a ready-at-hand.

Impaled_Onion-thatsmine
Автор

So she was like an average reddit nerd

WilhelmKonstantinAlexander
Автор

Kant says. If reason can prove something then it can also disprove it.

atuhairejob
Автор

In a space-time continuum, each living being changes with time through the movements of the living being. The experience of each living being is distinct and therefore subjective to itself. A living being can only perceive the present moment and its experience of its 'past' (in the present moment) through analysis based upon the knowledge it has received through experience up to the present moment it is in. Living beings share 'space-time' but not shared reality because all beings do not learn or experience events and knowledge at the same time.

shuttershadestv
Автор

How this does her and the ARI's cause any good, is anyone's guess. The irony is that she could easily have found an ally in Kant.

StateoftheMatrix
Автор

The only thing she read about kant is seemed to be the preface of CPR.

tanmaydusane
Автор

Percieved objects aren't false, merely true knky in resoect to the phenomenon. If i look at a green apple and say "the apple appears green" im speaking truth.

pseudomastix
Автор

You know kant? 😂 She never understood kant. She is in the zero level in philosophy. Zero, only zero.

insan.
Автор

I hope my haters talks behind my back like her. Everyone will be convinced that I was dead right!

baskaisimkalmamisti