The Titanic Mystery Solved | Scientists Unveil Shocking Truth | Scientific Findings

In this video, scientists have uncovered the truth about the Titanic, one of the most infamous shipwrecks in history. With the latest findings and research, they dive into the reasons behind the tragedy and dispel common misconceptions. Get ready to unravel the mysteries surrounding the Titanic and discover what really happened on that fateful night.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Always your feedback is welcome.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks for watching!

Subscribe!
-------------------------------------------------------------
#Libes #titanic

[theempath]

He didn't say the fire sunk the ship, he said it contributed to the sinking as the intense fire weakened the metal. This isn't the only one sayig about the fire, there is a second if not third video, there is also a video of survivors saying that they heard an explosion way before the Titanic his the iceberg. This was caused by the fire which was raging before it left to pick up passengers. In one you can clearly see the dark mark of where the fire was and tests have been done to show how the fire distorted the bulkheads. To say it is so wrong, you need to first look at all the evidence that has been given as the fire did contribute to the sinking. So Many factors lead to the sinking, it just shouldn't have happened.

[matthewhainer]

I'm so tired of this bullshit clickbait. The coal bunker fire forced 600 tons of coal to be moved from the starboard side to the port side. This gave Titanic a 3 degree port-list which she maintained when she hit the ice berg. If it wasn't for this list to port, computer models show that Titanic would have capsized to starboard like her sister ship Britanic, which also had six compartments initially filled. Meaning the coal fire in No.6 boiler room contributed greatly to saving lives on board.

The photo in question with a black spot on the hull isn't where the coal bunker fire was as OBVIOUSLY tht occured below the water line, nor is it in line with the coal bunker itself along the length of ship.

Even if the coal bunker fire weakened the hull steel of the ship in that local area, the ice berg ruptured the first four compartments without the need of fires in those areas. Similarly, the fire wouldn't have affected the whole length of boiler room 6 yet it still ruptured? If the coal bunker fired weakened any steel it was the section of the bulkhead connecting to boiler room 5. As at that point five compartments were compromised, Titanic was doomed anyways.

Finally, the fact that the fire caused the steel to fail is debunked quite well. Once cooled, the steel in the hills had not lost most of it's viability even in a small basketball sized part where the steel had warped.

[POOLIEY]

There are some issues with this. Moloney found images of Titanic as she was getting ready for her Sea Trials on April 2nd. Two of the images show what was described as a "dark mark". Other images were found from slightly different angles which doesn't show the dark mark. The mark that Moloney claims is from the coal bunker was actually 60 feet from the bunker where the coal fire was. The coal bunkers barely reached above the waterline, and the mark is seen mid way up the ship under the forward well deck. While the coal bunker that had the fire was under the first funnel and was noticed under the waterline.
To refer to the temperature, it was found that the fire didn't cause any breathing issues for stokers during the voyage. This means that the fire wasn't blazing at high temperature as the higher the temperature the more oxygen is needed. It is believed the fire was only a small smouldering fire deep but near the top of the bunker. How they dealt with the fire was to move the coal from the stb bunker (where the fire was) to the port side bunker. The fire was extinguished around April 13th, but added roughly 600 tons to her port side (left), which had her list about 2.5 degrees to port. But she was still stable, stability tests were done at Southampton in the week she was there.

Talking about the coal strike. This is true, strikes were going on. What the organisers did was use Titanic as she was the largest ship in the port, and any ship owned under the IMM sent there coal to Titanic along with there passengers. Titanic was quite under booked, and tragically a lot of the passengers on the voyage that joined at Southampton were originally booked on other ship.
And to talk about the position Titanic was in. Titanic faced towards the solent river in southampton. It wasn't to hide "a burn" it was just because it was easier for Titanic to get out if she was pointed the proper way. Leading to Titanic to be able to use her own propellers to assist in leaving the dock side. Many ships pass berth 44, and many images of the starboard side can be seen, and no dark mark can be seen.

The binoculars are something that is misunderstood. The conditions of that night was calm and moonless. The sky would be quite starry, and needless to say black. If you had binoculars, all you would zoom in on is complete darkness, having binoculars was only used to get a clearer look of something you have already spotted. It is just unfortunate that the lookouts saw the berg too late, so binoculars would have made it worse. But there was nothing better they could do.

The speed is also something that is wrong. She was travelling around 21 knots, common cruising speed. In comparison, Olympic, Titanic's sister ship, on that night when she heard Titanic was sinking reached 24.6 knots. But to say, it is common practice to go full speed ahead when going into an ice field. If the conditions are clear, it is believed there is no reason to slow down as you'd be able to spot danger. Plus ships turn faster when they are travelling faster. As Titanic can only turn by its rudder as the rear, the faster you are going the more water is being deflected by the rudder, and therefore the faster you turn.
And Titanic was actually ahead of schedule. It is something Elizabeth Lines said she over heard Capt. Smith and Bruce Ismay. Ismay saying that he estimates they will arrive in New York late on Tuesday, half a day ahead of schedule. The movie doesn't do this moment justice, as Elizabeth Lines says that Ismay did nothing to influence Smith into going faster, only too congratulate him. But Titanic was able to be late. She was scheduled to arrive at any time on Wednesday April 17th. But she was scheduled to leave New York on Saturday 20th April. So being a little late wasn't a massive issue.

The lifeboats were seen differently back then. They were seen as ferries to another ship. The laws and view on lifeboats only changed after Titanic sank. As for the practice, it was delayed to the morning on April 15th. But tests and rehearsals were done in both Belfast and Southampton.
Plus Capt. Smith was at the time an honourable seaman. A Navy officer, had a perfect record even after a few wars. He was the most experienced on the ship, and likely the best navigator out of all of the officers.

Californian was also a harsh topic. Even if they reacted to Titanic's first distress rocket or signal. They would have got to the site in 3 to 4 hours. So they would only be contributing to the collection of survivors. But the numbers of deaths wouldn't have changed. There was no way Californian could have reached the site in time. We know it took nearly 4 hours because Californian travelled to the sight in the morning to assist Carpathia.

As for the mirage, or refraction. The glossed over part with this is that a mirage requires light to pass through the sudden change of temperature to cause refraction. As there was only weak star light there couldn't have been a mirage during the night. Supported by the other ships reporting a cold mirage only during the day, never stating they saw it at night.

But I want to quickly go back to the fire. As I mentioned it moved the coal to the port side and had a port list at the time Titanic collided with the iceberg. First off, the iceberg punctured the forepeak, three cargo holds, boiler room 6 and the coal bunker of boiler room 5. The fire was in the starboard coal bunker of boiler room 5. However, even if the iceberg didn't reach the coal bunker, Titanic would have still sunk. As boiler room 6 was the 5 compartment opened and Titanic could only survive with the forward 4 filled. So the coal fire if it could have weakened the hull contributed to nothing. However, it actually did more good then bad, as the added weight to the port side, with water entering from the starboard side it initially had Titanic list to starboard, but throughout the night Titanic began reversing the list and began listing to port. This is important because it means that Titanic didn't capsize so she was able to launch all of her lifeboats outside of the final two collapsible which got washed off the deck. So in turn the coal fire saved more lives.

[J.R.in_WV]

All of these issues were raised and addressed at the inquiries in 1912 and in further investigations and studies afterward. “They” may have lied about the Kennedy assassination, Roswell, Area 51, the Iran contra crisis, etc, etc….but the Titanic disaster has been covered in great detail for over 100 years and for the most part the story hasn’t changed. The “weakened bulkhead” argument hasn’t “held water” since 1912 because people who were in boiler room 5 when it flooded lived through the ordeal and testified that it wasn’t what sank the ship. The wall that gave way in boiler room 5, which marked the flooding of the compartment that put the ship “over edge”, was a coal bunker wall. It was thin steel never designed to be watertight and was flooding from a hole in the side of the hull that made up its outer wall, not the bulkhead ahead of it. The bilge pumps running and the shoring up of the bunker wall the carpenters did are the only reason the ship didn’t go down in darkness far sooner than she did, like within the hour that Thomas Andrews predicted.

[marctrainor]

I've heard about the fire in other videos. I think it started even before the Titanic took sale. They tried to cover it up. What a selfish thing to do all in the name of fame and money. Total negligence in my view. Marc T.

[S.E.C-R]

I’ve heard most of this, but one thing I was really surprised to learn from this video that I’ve never heard anywhere before was that the Titanic could fly!
That’s just amazing, why have they been hiding that piece of information all these years?!

[robhutchins]

Okay, two questions. 1. Why aren't the pictures of the black spot in this video for viewers? 2. If he could see the black spot doesn't that suggest it's above the waterline? The titanic struck the berg well below the waterline.

[nickbreen]

What scientists? Bunker fires were very common in the days of coal fired ships. Try again.

[sirridesalot]

It's been tested and shown that due to the unusual conditions that night that binoculars would not have helped spot that iceberg.

RMS Titanic actually had more lifeboat capacity than what the Marine Regulations at the time called for.

[wraith]

It would be nice to hear the story over the LOUD background music.

[davinp]

The British Board of trade lifeboat law was outdated as they failed to update the law as ships grew bigger. it measured the number of lifeboats via gross tonnage not the number of passengers. Also, lifeboats were not viewed as lifesavers, but to transport people from a distressed ship to a rescue ship. Since there were many ships in the shipping lanes, there would have been a ship nearby to rescue them

[FreedomLovingLoyalistOfficial]

Oh yes, science proves that using binoculars in a foggy cold night would have saved Titanic from being sunk. This is worthy of a subscription. 👏

[judydenver]

Ships don't go on "flights", lol, they go on voyages, and trips, and sailings, but NOT "flights".

[qazxsw]

Harland and Wolff had a lot more than just 3000 workers building the ship. They had up to 13000

Coal bunker fires were not uncommon and rarely rendered a ship unsafe

I’m going ahead and predicting this is about the weak steel theory and put in my thoughts. This also cover the rivet theory:
You have something that weighs nearly 200, 000 tons slamming into something that weighs an estimated 500, 000 tons. Due to the way ships turn (it’s kinda like a car drifting), it wasn’t merely a gentle brushing with the berg. That’s a lot of energy/force getting transferred in the collision. She was doomed regardless.

Back to the video where I left off:
The coal was donated from the other ships and tickets were offered to their passengers in exchange. WSL was more pressured about the launch schedule itself and getting it into service than they were about the tickets already been sold as they were already months behind due to construction delays, repairs being done on the Olympic, etc

The ship was turned in the direction it was because the shipyard had trouble with the Olympic on her maiden voyage. Titanic was facing the sea so she could just fire up the engines and go (Olympic had to go through a series of awkward and difficult turns)

“There weren’t a single pair of binoculars. This is noteworthy because having a pair of binoculars could have saved the Titanic.”
*proceeds to not explain*
Lmao wut? Passenger testimony gives evidence of a cold air mirage. Having binoculars wouldn’t have changed that effect in any way. At best, they’d have seen the berg no earlier, but much bigger. At worst, they’d be focused somewhere else and not have seen it until they were quite literally on top of it. As for the binocular count, there were a few pair onboard. It’s just that the ones assigned to the lookouts and some other crew were locked up and the person who had the key forgot to turn it in before disembarking in Southampton
[edit]
Okay, it is explained, never mind me then

The Titanic’s “gears” were designed for her full speed. There was a piece of machinery that made sure of this. It was the “thrust block.” Taking her to full speed was even part of the certification tests (which she passed with flying colors). The theory you’re thinking of is that it was too fast for an ice field. One, Captain Smith sailed further south than the route to try to avoid it altogether. Two, it was basically standard procedure to speed through a known ice field location unless and until ice was actually spotted. Three, taking it to full speed was required for filling out a certain table (I forget the name of it, but it was used to get more accurate speed readings. It just needed to be calculated and recorded the first time it was used).

Alexander Carlisle was on the Board of Trade and had very little to do with the ships design. The Titanic had two lifeboats more than the law required. Negligent? Sure, I’ll give you that one. Criminally so? They *did* exceed the law’s requirements. Regardless, here’s a little detail no one thinks about: the last two boats on the Titanic were floated off, one of which upside down. This happened at the very late stages of the sinking. From the moment the evacuation began to the very moment it became impossible to launch any more boats (due to running out of time), the entire time was spent launching them. If there were any more, they likely would have remained anchored to the deck and got dragged down with the ship

A lifeboat drill was performed on the Titanic, though much earlier. There was a combination of reasons it was canceled including the weather and also the time to perform it

One officer was getting the boats launched rather quickly. I’ve no excuse for the low passenger count on many of them, but do keep in mind that many boats were a struggle to fill. Two boats had to be climbed over to access another two boats, plus many passengers at first didn’t think they were in any real danger.

The Californian did see the Titanic, though barely. The crew thought the flares were WSL company signals and had no idea what they meant (since the Californian wasn’t a WSL liner). The confusion was due to the Titanic not launching the flairs at the correct minute-intervals that was the standard. Also, didn’t Captain Lord retire? IMO, his only wrongdoing was he didn’t wake up his wireless operator to get in contact with the mystery ship (Titanic). Also also, due to the Californians top speed and her distance from the Titanic and also when the Titanic started calling for help, it was likely that the Californian wouldn’t have made it on time.

[ginantsfan]

As someone who has been studding the Titanic since 2nd grade, I already knew these. facts but I enjoyed your take on them so we can safely. say that the Titanic was sunk by the elements of fire ice and water as well as human. argents.

[tylerdowling]

20 million bottles of beer? That’s an allotment of about 9000 beers per passenger…

[davinp]

Also, the rivets used in that area of the ship were weaker, so they easily popped off when the iceberg hit it

[zhackiethedog]

The fire would've strengthen the hull? By this logic, then the really hot rivets, used to weld the hull platings together, should've already made the construction nearly impossible then.

[harlanabraham]

Many of the passengers believed the Titanic was unsinkable and didn't want to leave the ship. Most of the passengers that got on a lifeboat told their loved ones left behind, "see you for breakfast."

[orozcocris]

the fire was not at the location where the iceberg struck, it was where the ship split. binoculars would have done nothing to aid in seeing the iceberg. it was masked by inverted mirage caused by the cold temperatures of the water and the hot air. the same refraction he mentions when talking about the night flares. the Californian lookout claimed it was undistinguished from normal star light. if the operator of the radio of the titanic had not been rude, their sos would have been heard by the Californian and many would have survived. lastly, if the titanic had collided with the iceberg head on, it would have had enough watertight compartments to stay afloat