Transform a Film Camera Into a Digital Camera

With the Hasselblad CFV 100C digital back, the majority of Hasselblad film cameras are capable of capturing 100-megapixel digital imagery using traditional film bodies.

Film Camera: Hasselblad 503CW
Digital Back: Hasselblad CFV 100C
#photography #camera #film #tutorial

[citizinse]

As someone who's primarily shots in portrait, it'd be great to see a prism and grip in these shorts.

[HJRphoto]

That shutter sound is why I love this hassleblad so much and the leaf shutter sound it’s the sound of art being made

[craigbertram]

So Iconic. Recognizable instantly. Gold standard.

[luck-mp]

Really enjoying your content – I’ve been filming some vintage cameras myself lately. It’s a great niche!

[robertsalisbury]

The one thing they all miss out with this setup ( i have it) is the bloody dust created by the palpas and the shutter slap. Absolute nightmare. I ended up painting the insides with matt black paint to stabilise and seal all the dust. Its a beautiful thing to hold and work with but be warned as post clean up is a pain

[dalitrh]

Dear Santa.... I've actually been good this year!!

[Stickybutton]

Would it kill Hassleblad to produce a square sensor?

[jamestyrer]

I wish that I could buy such a digital back for my Roleiflex 3003.

[michaelbialas]

Die Hasselblad 500C das absolute Topmodel der Mittelformattechnik. Unschlagbar auch das Auslösegeräusch.

[grebbd]

Ну и молодцы, сказать нечего. Была в интернете информация про стартап: подобное по функционалу устройство для имитации 35 мм фотоплёнок для малоформатных камер. Видео презентация тоже есть.

[antonpetrov]

Большая игрушка. Современная оптика на голову выше качеством. Но сюда не не поставить

[YAXHY]

My dad has a replica of this hasselblad called kiev88 i think, would this work with that too?

[haroldcarlson]

It’s too bad you lose the use of the waist level finder. Using a screen is not the same.

[Zetaphotography]

When will there be enough stock for 90mm V2.5

[skaramicke]

"but now..." you loose 50% of what you see in the viewfinder because the sensor is tiny compared to the film

[matteolaborg]

And the digital back costs . . . USD $4000? $5000?

[narekkarapetyan]

Yes, we get it, your cameras are insanely good, but who needs it if your cubic cameras are expensive as hell, try to make a normal camera for once, not a literal cube that is like 8k