Nvidia's RTX 5090 CONFIRMED, AMD's New APU DESTROYS Intel!

Ryzen APU just destroyed Intel with less power, Nvidia's RTX 5090 gets confirmed, SMT isn't dead and Intel's in huge trouble! Stay tuned...

****Items featured in this video available here****

SOURCES:

TIMESTAMPS
0:00 SMT Is Not Dead
3:02 Intel's In Huge Trouble
7:51 AMD's New APU Obliterates Intel
9:35 Nvidia's 5090 Confirmed

[vensroofcat]

Mind blown. RTX 5090 will be called RTX 5090. You heard it here first.

[herematti]

AMD doesn't need do destroy anything, Intel already destroys itself

[rwn]

I switched to AMD when they introduced Ryzen cpus. I haven't purchased an Intel product since

[chriswright]

Ht is bad for Intel because how they use and abuse power among other things

[Rob-Davidson]

There's going to be a 5090? No way... lol

[cuteAvancer]

I can't wait for the 2.5k msrp (scalped for 3k) 5090.

[melheno]

Hyper threading does improve performance but slightly and increases temps considerably. Removing hyper threading is correct approach for Intel to provide headroom to the main thread not the fake thread.

[Nobe_Oddy]

The thing is Intel and AMD do SMT differently, although I don't know how they differ. And when Intel came out with it first it was called Hyper-Threading, but then AMD came out with their SMT it was called something else (although it still had the initials H.T.) but we are going way back to the Pentium 4 days.
ALSO, when I was reading up on WHY Intel decided to ditch SMT is wasn't about performance - they KNOW that SMT increases performance for sure - it's about the amount of REAL ESTATE adding SMT to the chip takes up vs. the performance gains it brings. Intel figured (just as an example, I don't recall the numbers they used) for that 18% average gain from adding SMT, it took up something like 60% the size of one of their little core. and so using that space for SMT on all their big core to add a few more little core would bring more performance.
This would NOT work for AMD tho, since they don't have "little" cores, they have 'DENSE' core... which are essentially THE SAME as a normal core, minus 100 to 200 MHz (I think) AND they are multi-threaded... So it would be pointless for them. :)

[LBXZero]

I think one reason why Intel is trying to drop hyperthreading is due to various security flaws involved in Intel's implementation of hyperthreading. You can't have those security flaws if you don't have hyperthreading. I think Intel really needs to redesign their architecture, and dropping hyperthreading to restructure their cores is a good first step. Once they have the single threaded cores figured out, they can work on adding hyperthreading/SMT back into the cores or provide other enhancements.

[frhyuhy]

I hope the 5090 comes with a better power connector 😊

[GhazUK]

5090 confirmed 👀🤦‍♂️ The click bait from this channel recently has been tiring

[rainbowdash]

damn Intel can’t even do anything to AMD and if Intel goes bankrupt then we might face serious issues.

[amogus]

what if my cpu hasn't showed any signs of instability or crashing its a i7-14700k I had it for 5 months. Am I safe?

[zameerbe]

Hi, Is there RDNA 3.5 available for desktop, after 8000 series when will AMD launch next gen APU for desktop?

[SidneyCritic]

But Puget said it had to subpoena - lol - Intel for the default setting, where as the MB makers were following the vague guidelines set by Intel, ie, Intel is still at fault if they say it CAN do it, but latter find out it CAN'T actually do it long term.

[joepearson]

AMD is about to finish off Intel with the 9000 series 👀

[tonyr]

Bro reported about nothing in regards to the 5090. Congrats, someone put 5090 in the description, like who cares bro. It told us nothing, and then ur argument for why cooler master ought to know like wtf. I care that’s why I’m mad. You need to improve your reporting skills pls

[GuyX]

Dont know if this has anything to do with it or not but I've been running a 13900K for over a year now and have not had these problems. I have the aftermarket cpu bracket which helps keep temps down far better than the OEM bracket, along with an ASUS ROG STRIX LC II 360 AIO which hardware kanucks showed with testing that it was one of the best ones, a ton of fans as well in my case BUT Im not running z690 board which is probably the biggest culprit of the crashing issue. Instead Im on a rog b760i motherboard and Im still running the bios released from June of 2023 IIRC . Ive played countless hours beating Cyberpunk at max settings several times and never had a crash to give you some usage perspective. Im sure intel is partially to blame but my advice for anyone looking to run this cpu or a 14900k is to stay away from the z690 boards, run it with the oem cpu limit settings, do the aftermarket cpu bracket, a good liquid AIO and have plenty of airflow. Yeah the issue is over volting however my experience so far has been great so I think the combination of not running a board engineered to use as much power as possible and keeping the cpu as cool as possible helps tremendously with stability. On a side note : I'll either wait for their true next gen CPUs or go for Nvidia's if its out by then but until then Im not updating anything my voltage is already well within Intel's acceptable limit and again I believe its because of the board and the oem settings .

[gertjanvandermeij]

Code has nothing to do with 13 and 14th gen Intel CPU's ! It all has to do with RUST & OXIDATION !!!

[troeteimarsch]

Oh god... disabling HT and the e-Cores does not do any harm to gaming performance as of right now. Disabling HT and adding 8 e-Cores has way more multi-threading performance than 8 p-Cores with HT on. So what Intel does is:
1) retaining single core performance crown with ht disabled p-cores, that need less voltage and less amps therefore run cooler
2) reitaining multi core performance crown with added e-cores, because 8+20 is better than 16+HT.

What is not stated in this video, but is already leaked info:
the upcoming e-cores are going to be on par performance wise with current p-cores.