Terrence Howard Is A Silly Goof #shorts #maths #joeroganexperience

I explain basic multiplication in an effort to debunk a claim made my Terrence Howard multiple times in the last few years. This was brought to my attention by his recent rise in popularity caused by Joe Rogan's podcast.

[SoshulCom]

Don’t listen to this 5 year old curly sue

[ronweasley]

It’s insane that we even have to explain this to adults

[kennynerd]

I want to see Terrence Howard and Neil Degrass Tyson have a Debate.

[CornKingsTV]

Terrence really said that like it was a complete mindfuck when it came to him

[Marvins_Gaye]

Terrance suffers from such a narcissistic God Complex that the man thinks he can calculate BETTER than a CALCULATOR😂😂😂

[dancole]

He's not crazy. He's just stupid and confident.

[chrismerard]

Multiplication of 2 integers is the repeated addition of any of those integers.
Example : 3x2= 3+3 or 2+2+2

So by definition, for any Multiplication of 2 integers there should be at least 2 additions possible.

Therefor by saying that 1x1=1 we automatically say that 1x1= 1+0 or 0+1.
Which contradicts the multiplication principle by using 0 which isnt one of the terms.

What we should have done is this.
1x1= 1+1 or 1+1.
So
1x1= 2 fits the multiplication criteria way more then 1x1=1.

[kerem]

You just dont or cant understand that the hydrogen atoms bisexual tones inside a mamas womd is equally electrically pressurized into the hydrogen atoms but its not equal on the gravitational plain it is equal only in the electrically conjugated nitrogen atoms that binding to the ratio of the numbers calculus roots

[thelostandunfounds]

Scenario: Implementing energy-saving measures in buildings.

• Initial Energy Use: 1000 kWh.
• Outcome Factor: Energy efficiency improvements labeled as 1 but effectively doubling perceived savings.
• Final Energy Use: The savings are so significant that the perceived energy efficiency is effectively doubled.

Formula:
1000 \times 1 = 2000

Application: This can be used to model scenarios where energy efficiency improvements have a compounded or amplified effect, perhaps through additional benefits like reduced maintenance costs or increased system longevity.

In real world application, the act of a one time process on an object in an environment can result in the doubling of an object.

Hydra, one head gets cut off one time. Two new heads are created.

Humans generally carry one child. One occasion of procreation doesn’t always equal one child. Sometimes you get two or more.

The truth is there is more here than you think at you’re not looking deep enough because you doesn’t understand how reality works.

[Greg_Andrews]

When anyone says something like, "Am I wrong or is the calculator wrong/broke?", You know he is messed up ... Like "Flat Earther" messed up.

[magicmeatball]

I think groups/repeated addition is a bad explanation for multiplying, only because it falls short of explaining anything other than natural numbers (and 0).
On a different note I think it would be fun to try to make a function out of standard operations that replicates multiplication in Terryism. It’s pretty challenging but I’m making progress.

[Haundo]

Terrance has done some pretty incredible work. He may not get everything right but to call him stupid would be stupid.

[ethanstevenson]

If you ADD 1, one time how do you not get 2? If you get 1 did you really ADD anything at all??

[PyuckYiu]

I believe this guy. His wearing glasses

[tyroneusMaximusAfricanus]

The way you explain it, I can see why people go off into the distant. It’s groups, it’s groups of groups. Like they said in preschool when we still did BOD maths and counted on our fingers

[NoobsJourny]

Not saying TH is right at all but his point is that the math we've been taught is essentially "fake math" or math with information left out. So to argue against him by explaining how math works (the fake math) is kinda pointless and shows lack of thought into what his point is.

We have proof that our (fake math) is real but that proof is just things the fake math was designed around as to make it seem legit. TH hasn't shown any solid proof that I've seen. so for now hes wrong but im open to seeing more from him.

[codylocy]

You can put multiplication into a graph, and it can visually represent it a lot better 1×1 is equal 1 group of 1, which is 1. 2 groups of 2 is 4. This was taught to us in like 2nd grade. Idk though I am pretty retarded.

[platOOky]

Obviously this guy paid attention in pre - school but I wonder if they had thought us that 1x1=2 would we question it?

[buckles]

2×1=1+1=1
But
1×1=1
Do you see how there is a second equation in the 1st one and not the second bc you aren't doing anything to 1. So it only exists in math. Ex. Pi its just the closest representation mathematically to a curve. Bc its something we can't measure with straight lines.

[kirkmarshall]

So.. in the real world .. if i have one apple in my hand and i multiply it by zero apples.. ( not sure what that means in the real world) is that apple in my hand going to just vanish,