The Super Motionless Energy Generator

preview_player
Показать описание
Introducing the Super MEG: A New Frontier in Energy Conversion! Today, I’m excited to share with you a groundbreaking concept that I’ve named the Super MEG. This innovative system explores the possibility of running a transformer in reverse, drawing inspiration from Bedini’s insights into the novel interactions that occur when operating electronics in unconventional ways. The Super MEG leverages this reverse approach to create a highly efficient energy conversion system, and I’m here to explain how it all works. Please visit forum link for the full explanation and basic diagram. As I can not fit it all into the description.

And unique as well from the original MEG. This design does not depend on a high power magnet.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This seems like the an awesome idea... basically the inverse of capturing the impulse spike on the electric side!!

HighonIonicthought
Автор

Love this Joel! You have a unique mind :)

OfficiallyMeta
Автор

AWSOME BROTHER... TREND SETTING BARRIER BREAKING!!!! A NORMAL DAY AT THE OFFICE... THANKS JOEL!!!

jasonjaffray
Автор

Capacitors and Inductors have natural reactance which means they are essentially a load . So for the MEG it must be working on amplification if it is going to work at all and the signals must be in phase with gain on each cycle . I can only see this happening inside the Iron core assuming is it low carbon we can remove the excess flux developed as quickly as possible which is an important factor in the collection process of any out side influence to our own supply signal, as i stated this is most likely to occur in the iron core material as iron is a natural booster of electro motive/magnetic force . Dr Holcomb from Holcomb energy systems demonstrated this in laments term with the use of two identical inductors one with an iron core and the other without the iron core, i think we all know this natural form of either a more efficient of transfer of electric fields or if you want to call it amplification the verdict is still undecided as to which it is >>> (amplification over unity or 100% COP Efficiency) ???

mykedoes
Автор

amazing as aways Joel! Cant wait to see how you build and test it! ^^

MrBademy
Автор

Very interesting of how you're using a "backwards" methodology w/this idea. Regardless of it's eventual operating parameters, you're trailblazing a whole new level of creative thinking in a field which often ( though not always ) stiflingly rigid in it's approach. Kudos to you sir !

Kenneth-cfeh
Автор

motionless yes with solid state materials having potential differential . I would say no more than 1v differential in materials so they dont electrolyze each other too fast and you have more control with your insulator / semi conductor separator . 👍

mykedoes
Автор

I would say use the cells to generate emf into soft iron core with dc pulses, after knowing the voltage peaks of the pulse you can wind the appropriate coil with the minimum number of turns needed to receive that voltage peak. I think this is explanatory from here you can wrap that custom coil around Iron and use a step down coil wrapped around the same iron to get your low voltage with more amps behind it but your not going to know what is the best low voltage for the cell signal source feed rate until you have a ball park estimate of the current flowing . get the milli amp measurement and combine that with the volts peak of the spike coming off coil 1 to get your ohms for your pickup winding aka coil 2, coil 2 is the spike receiving coil coil 3 is wrapped around the same core as coil 2 coil one can have its own core or share core with coil 2 and 3, up to you ;), i would start with a 36awg something pre wound that has close to the resistance you calculated from your known amps and volts coming from the cell stack . LMK ;) coil 1 is spike generator coil which is power sourced by the cells and a cap dump.. Dump the spike from coil 1 using HV diode into Coil 2 you may want to transfer to emf as well by using one core for all 3 coils . 1 is spike gen 2 is spike stator 3 is step down winding which is the hardest part need amp reading on the pulse combine that with the volt peak that the pulse generated in coil 1 (spike Gen Coil powered by cell and cap dump)

mykedoes
Автор

if the cell puts out 1.5v and you use a 10mf cap to dump the pulse peak will be greater than if you use a 1mf to dump . but the frequency will be faster with 1mf, going to need use capacitor sized for 60 hz or 50hz what ever your devices already run off, this is probably good thing cause its still a low frequency and the cells are not going to have enough amps to get HF, but consider that if you want a higher frequency the stack needs to have more layers or you can keep the layers and increase surface area

mykedoes
Автор

I'm finding it hard to visualize. Good work Joel, You've got my attention, so you must do this on video.

charlescazaly
Автор

In high school electrical shop class, we learned how to discriminate betwixt "REAL" power as opposed in conjunction with "APPARENT" power... I always suspected that there could lurk some possible unknown mysterious link for gains to be obtained tapping into this ghostly "apparent" power somehow... You might be on the right track with this line of reasoning.

neIntangible
Автор

So this would reduce eddy current loses from what I understand. Are you going to build this soon? Would be neat to see.

Tech_Planet
Автор

You must plug your head into the mains at night. Sounds amazing. 👍

dSquared
Автор

I like where this thought experiment is going however I am finding it difficult to reconcile the possibilty of induced AC in the aluminum rods if the neither the iron core nor the aluminum rods are in motion, thereby inducing no current flow at core saturation. Seems to me a crucial element in the design is missing that would facilitate the AC induction - correct me if I am wrong. I suppose even disordly AC with unstable frequency can still be harvested collected as DC via rectifier bridge so maybe through pulsing just the right rhythm you would get a usuable current at the rectifier. Still, without the a conductor moving through a magnetic field or a magnetic field moving over a conductor there can be do induced current. When you first turn on such a device, at the point of saturation the magentic field ceases to move, does it not? Current passing through a conductor produces magnetic flux/field however does magnetic flux saturating a core induce a current once the core reaches and stays at maximum saturation? Does a magnetic field actually flow along its "field lines" and remain in cartesian dance surrounding the source of the magnetic field? muh brain

thisunity
Автор

bearden says the meg uses energy from uncurled A potential, but evey transformer works like this.
He doesn't say in what direction E=-dA/dt is trnsmitted: radially from the core or parallel to the magnetic spin in the core.

alanx
Автор

Does anyone know where I can pick up some chemalloy wire? The company that’s named after the product doesn’t seem to make the product anymore, and none of my local metal shops have even heard of it. I’m to the point of seriously considering commissioning some custom metallurgical work just so I can get my hands on it. Do any of you have a source I could use?

isaackellogg
Автор

❤ Hi, Joel.Are you talking about using microwave transformers backwards ?

joeeasygo
Автор

OK. What is it supposed to do?
Hopefully not another magic gizmo that claims to overcome the laws of physics.

TheGhungFu