Universe Symmetry: Exploring the Aesthetics of Equilibrium

🌌 Dive into the mesmerizing world of universe symmetry with this mind-boggling video! 🤯 Experience the beauty of cosmic equilibrium as we unravel the secrets of symmetry in the universe. 🔍 From galaxy symmetry 🌀 to stellar symmetry 💫, discover how patterns persist across the vast expanse of space. 🚀 Join us on a journey through the intricate realm of quantum symmetry ⚛️, delving into the subtleties of subatomic particles and the standard model of particle physics. 📚 Explore the mysterious electroweak interaction 🔗 and the eternal laws of conservation ♾️ that govern our universe. Don't forget to hit subscribe for more informative content like this!
#symmetry #cosmic #equilibrium #quantum #galaxy #universe

[vanikaghajanyan]

4:08 The problem is actually a methodological oversight.
1. The probabilistic interpretation of physical phenomena by quantum theory implies the symmetry of the results: 50/50.
2. However, such an interpretation by quantum theory is a priori extrapolated to asymmetric phenomena.
3. For example, in the case of Schrodinger's cat, the radiation source is considered as a symmetrical/probabilistic (50/50) element of the experiment, however, it is combined with an asymmetric participant: a cat that, being alive or dead, has asymmetric states.
4. For clarity, you can “slightly” modify the experiment: place a dead cat in a "black box" with a radiation source. It seems that now even the most faithful follower of quantum theory will not claim that the cat is both dead and alive at the same time.
5. It is better to put illuminated photo paper in a drawer: it is unlikely that the paper will react to the actions of the 50/50 source in such a way as to become usable again.
6. Events and phenomena themselves exist independently of the frame of reference, but their specific manifestations and quantitative ratios in different frames of reference (attention!) they can be completely different.*
7. So, if in your frame of reference you observe / measure and/ or evaluate / identify the probabilistic nature of a certain physical process in another frame of reference, for example, for a coin: 50/50; then this is your right, since all frames of reference are equal (not to be confused with equivalence).
{By the way, entangled particles: each of the particles in its own frame of reference is equal with its spin, for example, up, with another particle with spin down, in a different coordinate system, but is not equivalent to the other.
8. And in the system associated with the coin, there is no probability: the usual natural physical process takes place here.**
9. It is clear that with all possible interpretations of quantum theory, the "tradition of one-sidedness”, unfortunately, stupidly/intrusively holds: for now.
Even in the multi-world and with the “appearance of properties in particles due to measurement", Bell, Wigner… Hence the “observer effect".
10..Finally, the evaluation of the state function of the system under study depends on the choice of the reference frame and coordinate system.
11. Jokes with time asymmetry are unacceptable even for such a "blindly lucky quantum theory".

*) - The equations that formulate the laws of physics must be invariant with respect to any coordinate transformations:
"Equality" and "the same course of processes" are not analogous concepts: and the word "relativity" itself contributed to the confusion of the concepts of "relative motion" and "relativism of phenomena".
The relativity of motion determines the immutability of laws:
the ambiguity of the word "relativity", when the content changes depending on whether it is applied to motion or to the formulation of physical laws, caused many errors." (Tonnela, Updating the concept of relativity in Einstein's physics).
**) - When Einstein inadvertently noted: "God does not play dice, " Bohr rightly pointed out: "One should not tell God how to rule the world."
However, Einstein apparently meant that there is no randomness for bones.