Dog DNA expert takes stand at Karen Read murder trial

The Karen Read murder trial resumed with witness testimony.

[kgraham]

Once they showed the Google search made by another woman at about 2:27am, or thereabouts, about how long it took to die in the cold, I knew then that Read isn’t the guilty party in this fiasco! I hope the jury does too!

[ROCKLIKEACOBB]

SO she didn't take the swabs, she "received" the swabs.

[stellawilkerson]

If this isn’t the most incompetent trial I’ve ever seen! Doesn’t even matter if the parties are found guilty or innocent, the way it was investigated is so bazaar! The State Police was so incompetent in the way it was handled. When does the lead investigator not go into the home and not rule out any evidence. Am I missing anything? On its face, they didn’t even investigate or rule out any evidence.

[brizzle]

I believe today colin albert said that O'keefe had a dog and nephew and niece in his home---wouldn't he have dog on his clothing if he did in fact have a dog in his home?

[shaleniramsahai]

So much shadiness in this case. How do we really know it was his shirt that was tested.
Fbi probe said he wasn't hit by a car. So how did he sustain such injuries?

[sandymcpartlon]

Bring in a dog training expert to identify bite marks

[paaja]

There is no chain of custody to these mystery swabs no proof of where they were taken from no actual evidence to speak of !
This is so bogus !
Where’s the shirt? Where’s the hoodie he had on?

[zerher]

I still don’t understand how it even took this long for this to all go to trial

[danasandoval]

Leave the poor dog out of this, next it will be all the dogs fault.

[MLSPlatforms]

If they believed she hit him with a car then why was it tested for Dog DNA ?

[veragreen]

Why is it so difficult for everybody to get that when police investigators conducted their investigation they had these crucial sources of information before them at the outset :
1. They would never expect their police colleagues to be murderers;

2. the defendant literally confessed at the outset “I hit him” … “I hit him” …

All the rest which is dividing a township is a theory being vigorously promoted by the defence, raising suspicion and firing up huge discord in the community...

[madfisher]

So when Mrs Albert re-, homed the dog, obviously she knew where dog is. But since no dog DNA was found on Mr. O'Keefe, they didn't have to go to the rehomed dog & get DNA. (If the Alberts actually tried to get rid of the dog because of nefarious reasons, they wouldn't just rehome him somewhere)

[bagdadbob]

Did they send the 2 swabs in a solo cup ❓
Everything about this case is extremely suspect except Karen Reed. I think the Feds have the goods and are just awaiting the outcome.

[hectornegron]

No dog DNA found; impressive.
But wait, who took those samples and where from?
Not the person who tested them.

[jameshamlett-sx]

Completely ridiculous to think these are dog bites...lol. You could make a better argument than they're from a parrot....lol

[debbysalmon]

I'm sorry her skirt is two short.

[clee]

MIKE JOHNSON, JUST SHOWED AMERICA HOW PIMPS STICK TOGETHER, SO MUCH FOR CHRISTIANITY

[davinxi]

Why is this important and can’t it be contimqted from UC Davis 0:50

[govindagovindaji]

01:11 This is at least the 2nd instance of 'the Defense' wanting to have things both ways. Claiming they were 'smart cops familiar with how to rig an investigation and/or cover-up' on the one hand, but then doing something stupid like waiting almost 4 months to send Chloe packing and also waiting until after she had bit a neighbor. If the O'Keefe's were attempting to hide their dog, they would have had it 'go missing' much closer to the date ~ like the day of. Cops would have known Chloe would have to go much earlier had she been involved. It's fine to want Karen found not guilty if that is your position but you want to use common sense toward viewing anything offered as evidence.

[MichaelWilliams-vbwr]

Shes innocent probally D.V ans assaulted