5 Reasons We Do NOT Believe in 2 Gods

Why We Believe in One God and One Lord

Amazon: Why I Became a Biblical Binitarian Mario Shepard

Disclaimer: Biblical Binitarianism is unorthodox and non-creedal. You should use discernment when considering the content on this channel. Please discuss with your pastors and leaders. Also, please search the Scriptures for yourself to determine if these things are true.

[BiblicalBinitarian]

Let us know if you agree or disagree with our 5 reasons. Enjoy.

[Iamcrucifiedwithchrist]

Beautifully brought out. I have the same beliefs, but never heard of the term Binitarian until your channel. The expounding on all the points brought out in scripture was well proven. Another verse I enjoy using along with John 5:26 and John 6:57 is…

2 Corinthians 13:4

4 For though he was crucified through weakness, yet he liveth by the power of God. For we also are weak in him, but we shall live with him by the power of God toward you.

Blessings to you brother. Grace and peace be multiplied unto you From the Father and his Son!

[ianf.famisaran]

Amen 🙏🏽❤ God bless you Brother Mario 👍🏾👍🏾

[jeep]

Great explanation, it makes me happy to hear a brother in Christ explain this relationship biblically.

[SteveLeeder]

This is absolute fire 🔥 awesome truth there bro!
All things are FROM the Father, THROUGH the Son.. and we could add IN the Spirit.. one God the Father, one Lord Jesus Christ, one Spirit
BLESSINGS X2

[denny]

Greetings all, does anyone know of any Binitarian churches in south central Pennsylvania? I have believed in a form of binitarianism a long time(30 plus years) and it's about time for me to find a binitarian church. Mario, your doctrine sounds a bit like Nader Mansour(on youtube) but without the seven day adventist beliefs.

[easttexan]

the Godhead is so much clearer now. Scriptures like Isa 9:6 had me confused somewhat. It's amazing what a believer can learn when they study the bible themselves and stop relying on "doctrine" handed down for a couple hundred years and just swallow it, hook, line, and sinker. I gonna look at Unitarism next cause I am beginning to see that in binitarism too.

[korydiva]

Another great video Mario. Much appreciated.

[frankjones]

Amen Brother..we agree on all 5.
. I like reading the Bible without having to explain every verse like others must do because they don`t accept the clear teaching.
So many Apologist`s debate about a hundred scriptures in the book of John.
Actually John concludes his gospel with his reason for writing the book...

The Purpose of John's Gospel. What did John believe.
Jo 20:30
And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book:
But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ,
the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.

Gal 1:1 What did Paul believe.
1 Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead;)

Ro 8:11 If the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ Jesus from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit who dwells in you.

It`s almost comical how Trinitarians will see the word "us" in the Old Testament and say "See that must be another God with God". They have to walk over a thousand scriptures where GOD is "HE" "ALONE" "UNO" " by Himself before finding the word "us" .

[shadowofthemorning]

Do you agree with this: “Jesus is God, not Yahweh.” Why do I say this? I say this because Jesus was begotten from YHWH; he literally CAME FORTH from God’s own spiritual being. This means that Jesus and YHWH are of the same exact essence, however, they are clearly two distinct different persons and YHWH is clearly shown as being higher than Christ when it comes to wisdom and authority. So I believe that if someone says that “Jesus is God” they should also include “not Yahweh” at the end of it to avoid confusion

[tonosegovia]

Thanks 🙏, what is de differences between this interpretation and the Unitarian

[thapack]

Hey brother, I am very much enjoying your videos. Your stance seems like you are trying very hard to remain biblical and I want you to know I highly respect that and appreciate it!

From what I am understanding from your videos I don't see your view as being "Binitarian" due to the fact that this label usually leads people to think that you would be a Trinitiarian who believes in 2 persons instead of 3 being "God." However, it seems like you really believe there are 2 which truly exist separate from one another. You also have said that they are both "fully divine" but you deem one as the ultimate head and source while the other is not. This view really seems strikingly close to the unitarian views of some of the early Christians as well as people such as Samuel Clarke. These views are generally classified by people such as Dr. Dale Tuggy as being "Unitarian Subordinationism." It really seems that this is a more accurate label for your view. What are your thoughts? I would like to know as I think this is a label difference where the substance of belief behind two different labels is nearly identical but for some reason you've adopted different labels from one another. I'll elaborate a little more below.

Having read "The Scripture Doctrine of the Trinity" by Samuel Clarke I think your view is very close to his concerning the Father and the Son. The main difference I see is that after you both describe the Father and Son in nearly the exact same way but then you say that you're "Binitarian" and he said he was "Trinitarian"....meanwhile I think they are both "Unitarian" views! Another difference, after stating all the same things about the Son that you did, he states that this means the Son is not "fully divine" because he is not the source of all things. The Father is the head, and thus the ultimate source and the only one possessing aseity. The Son has every other divine attribute other than aseity. This is the only difference between them in his view. To be the Father is to possess aseity and to be the Son is to be begotten of the Father and thus, while being eternal, means that He lacks aseity. And because of this the Father is greater and is "The One God" while Jesus is "The One divine Son of God." Almost everything else is exactly the same between you. I think you should check out his work if you haven't already. If you don't want to pay for a hard copy I will post the link to the free online version for you below. Grace and peace to you from God our Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.

[iamafollowerofChrist]

I'm watching this agan and again and let me tell you that this is the best explanation that I ever seen in my life. The Bible is so clear but people prefer to twist the scriptures.

[SamuelForjoe]

Agreed. Even in heaven Christ continues to speak of being given authority from the FATHER:
Rev 2:27  and he will rule them with a rod of iron, as when earthen pots are broken in pieces, even as I myself have received authority from my Father.

But yet the FATHER always does things by HIS own authority.

Acts 1:7
He said to them: “It is not for you to know the times or dates that the Father has set by His own authority."

[followyeshua]

See what your saying actually lines up with the word of God it’s really hard to find channels like this most the time the truth is far and few in between meaning if you see something that’s super popular a lot of the time it’s not true because people have itchy ears.. Thanks for posting the links under my comment on your other video.

[christfollower]

Hi Mario. Thanks for your presentations. I am currently reading through your book.

Just a few questions:

1) Do you believe in ontological subordination of the Son to the Father?

2) Do you use the term “God” of the Father in the sense of “identity” and of the Son in a “predicative” sense?

3) Is the “divinity” of the Son derives from the Father, making the Father relationally causal for the Son?

4) *When* did the Son come into existence? Or, put another way, the two divine heads, are they coexistent?

[keithfuson]

Actually SS dies teach that there are two primary Persons in the biblical narrative and the Father is the one God and the Son is God representatively, not literally. There are two God's and two Lords. The Father is God absolute and the Son is God relative. Only the Father is the Supreme Deity and Creator of all. Only the Father is the one God, the only God, the Most High God.

[seanobanion]

How do I get your book. I can't find where to pull it up and order it on my card

[djmaydraws]

You’ve said in another video though that Jesus is fully God. But not The God. If he’s not the God but is yet “fully God” does that not make him as Justin Martyr put it “another God”? It starts to sound slightly contradictory if he both is and isn’t God. However, it does make sense if you clarify that you’re using the word “God” with two separate definitions, one being merely a nature (like “Man”) and the other being an identity (The God, the Most High/Almighty)

[DrDave]

I hope God, who is three distinct persons, opens your eyes before it is too late.