JWST Discovers a Supernova Distorted by a Gravitational Lens, Solving the Mystery Surrounding Hubble

Why isn't the universe doing what it should? Or to put it another way: why does the actual expansion rate of the cosmos differ so dramatically from the theoretically predicted value? For several years, experts have been struggling with the so-called Hubble tension. But now the James Webb Telescope has detected a very special supernova that appears three times in a single image due to the gravitational lensing effect – and thus allows the value of the Hubble constant to be determined to an unprecedented extent! But confusingly, this revolutionary method of measurement sometimes raises even more questions than it answers – and we may have to admit that we are still a long way from understanding the true nature of the universe!

[ronaldkemp]

There's no such thing as a Hubble constant because the increasing distance between galaxies is not the same everywhere in the universe. It's more like a Hubble average than a constant. Astronomers determine the absolute motion of a distant galaxy based on it's redshift against a standard of rest, which is the cosmic microwave background radiation or CMB. They then take their motion and divide it by it's distance to get the rate at which the galaxy is accelerating away per megaparsec or Mpc. Example.

Edwin Hubble measured several galaxies that clearly didn't fit the dark energy or Hubble constant assumptions, here are just 4 galaxies out of hundreds he measured.

Galaxies A & B were both 16 megaparsecs away.
Galaxies C & D were both 93 megaparsecs away.

Galaxy A had a redshift indicating it was moving 500 km/s which is 500 km a second / 16 Mpc means it's accelerating away from us at 31.2 km/s per Mpc.

Galaxy B had a redshift indicating it was moving 6, 500 km/s which is 6, 500 km a second / 16 Mpc means it's accelerating away from us at 406 km/s per Mpc.

Galaxy C had a redshift indicating it was moving 3, 500 km/s which is 3, 500 km a second / 93 Mpc means it's accelerating away from us at 38 km/s per Mpc.

Galaxy D had a redshift indicating it was moving 10, 200 km/s which is 10, 200 km a second / 93 Mpc means it's accelerating away from us at 110 km/s per Mpc.

None of these galaxies accelerate away from us at the same rate per Mpc. Meaning, the accelerated expansion of space does NOT fit the Hubble constant. Talk about a Hubble Tension.

The interesting thing is, even though galaxy B being 16 Mpc away was almost 6 times closer to us than galaxies C and D it's acceleration per Mpc was much faster than theirs. This clearly indicates there is no such thing as a Hubble constant. It's not a constant, it's an average. Thus the accelerated expansion of space blamed on a Hubble constant does NOT fit observations. It most certainly isn't law.

The fact that each galaxy accelerates at a different rate per Mpc is empirical evidence a single explanation like dark energy cannot be assumed. Something else is responsible! I explained everything and even came up with a viable solution to solve the mystery. The single action not only solved the dark energy mystery but also solved what's causing the motion pinned on dark matter. I published the paperback book *SECRET UNIVERSE : GRAVITY BY RON KEMP* in September of 2021, 3 months before the James Webb telescope was launched. On page 48 I wrote quote, "The JWST, James Webb Space Telescope will discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as the telescope can see, further than 13.8 billion light-years away." Then on page 147 in conclusion I wrote quote, "With great distance there will be no Hubble constant discovered either. Every time they try and come up with a set value for the Hubble constant a different value will be deduced." I wrote that because I determined what's causing the distance between galaxies to accelerate with distance. And it not what you think. The solution was quite simple. When scientists realize what this action is, they're going to say, "why didn't I think of that?"

After I determined the solution to dark energy and dark matter I was able to accurately predict what the JWST would discover at the edge of the observable universe. Scientists are still scratching their heads trying to come up with a single solution to explain all the observations. Yet, I already published the solution in my book in 2021, more than 3 years ago.

[TroyIII]

🤣😂🤣 "it is the space itself that is constantly growing"

[JungleJargon]

When are silly scientists going to figure out that the changes in the measures of time and distance due to less gravity in the vicinity change the speed of light relative to another place with more gravity, deeper inside of a galaxy? Scientists can’t seem to figure out that where gravity changes clocks and measuring sticks, it changes the speed of light by changing the rate of causation! There’s no need for invisible matter when you take into account the variable rate of causation.

Space is not flat in the measures of time and distance on larger scales just like the Earth is not flat on larger scales. Light MUST indeed *always* travel 186, 000 miles per second at the speed of light C. When distance is stretched from having less gravity, light *must still* complete traveling that stretched distance in the time determined by C. That means the light is traveling faster as perceived by us in a more contracted frame of reference where there is more gravity. *Add to that* the fact that a second passes by *faster* farther away from the center of mass which increases the speed light MUST travel *even more.*

It’s really not complicated. It’s so simple. It’s the very reason things appear to be moving faster than the speed of light moving away from the center of the galaxy because they are moving faster away from the center of the galaxy yet without exceeding the speed of light. I don’t know why that is so hard to understand. Don’t even try to put an age on the universe when time itself is a creation that is dependent on the location and the amount of matter and mass in the vicinity.

There are three rates to consider.
*1. The diminishing effect or draw of gravity away from the center of mass.
*2. The increasing rate of time away from the center of mass.
*3. The increasing measure of distance away from the center of mass.

Speed is measured by time and distance which both change and that changes the speed of light and causation. Things happen faster. Distance gets longer without gravity and time goes by faster, both of which combine to speed up causation. The light has to arrive at a farther distance faster when distance is stretched *and* time also goes by faster. *Then* there is the first thing to consider and that is the diminishing draw of gravity the farther away it is from the center of the galaxy which means things eventually slow down the farther away they are from the center mass of a galaxy. (It's not complicated. No dark matter is needed.) 😎

Redshift happens when light leaves a galaxy. Blueshift happens as light enters a galaxy. All things being equal, the light will be redshifted as it leaves a galaxy and then blueshifted back again as it enters our galaxy. Except we already know galaxies are different sizes. The distant galaxies that we can see are very large and the distances and the amount of matter between here and there is excessive causing more redshift than our small galaxy can blueshift back to its original spectrum. The more distant a galaxy is the more accumulated gravity there is from nearby masses causing more redshift. So the universe is not expanding into oblivion for no reason.