Correctly Using super() in Dynamically Added Methods with Python Metaclasses

Learn how to properly call `super()` in dynamically added methods within Python metaclasses, avoiding TypeErrors and AttributeErrors with this clear guidance.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: What is the corret way to call super in dynamically added methods?

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding super() in Dynamically Added Methods

In the world of Python programming, using super() can sometimes lead to unexpected challenges, especially when dealing with dynamically added methods via metaclasses. A common pitfall arises when the parent class is not correctly inferred, leading to TypeErrors and AttributeErrors. In this guide, we'll delve into a specific case of this issue and provide a clear solution to ensure proper use of super() without any confusion.

The Problem at Hand

Let's break down the problem with a practical example. Imagine we have a metaclass that creates a class with a dynamically added method called test. Here's a simplified structure:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When we instantiate A and attempt to call the test method:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This results in a TypeError: super() can't find the parent's method. The issue lies in the use of super() without parameters, which cannot properly identify the context since the method is being defined dynamically within a metaclass.

Why This Happens

The crux of the problem is that the parameterless super() behaves differently in Python. It's designed to create a reference to the "physical" class where the super() call is placed, which, in this case, is the metaclass itself (FooMeta), not the class object being created (like A or B). This discrepancy leads to the errors encountered.

The Solution

To resolve this issue, we need to utilize the version of super() that takes two positional arguments: the class from which you wish to call the parent method and the instance (self) on which you're calling it.

Here’s the corrected code for the FooMeta class:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Breaking Down the New Approach

Using super(type(self), self): This call tells Python to look for the parent method in the class of the instance (self). It ensures that Python knows the context of the method being called, leading to the correct invocation without errors.

Instance Reference: The self parameter provides a reference to the instance of the class, allowing the super() call to effectively traverse the method resolution order correctly.

Conclusion

In summary, when working with dynamically added methods in Python metaclasses, it is essential to be mindful of how super() is utilized. By providing explicit parameters to super() using the format super(type(self), self), you can ensure that the method resolution works as intended, avoiding the pitfalls of TypeErrors and AttributeErrors.

So, if you ever find yourself grappling with similar errors in your Python projects, remember this technique to make calling super clean and efficient!