Evolution is Evidence for God's Existence

preview_player
Показать описание
Is evolution an argument against God's existence or for God's existence?
Is evolution even a scientific fact or just a theory? Join us as we dive into the different types of evolution and discover if evolution is atheist strongest evidence against there being a God.

——————————————————————————————————————————

#GodExistsProveMeWrong #SubscribeTheChristianApologist #PleaseShareThis #ApologeticsMatter

——————————————————————————————————————————

🎙SUBSCRIBE TO OUR PODCAST🎙


——————————————————————————————————————————

👥 SOCIAL MEDIA 👥


——————————————————————————————————————————

💻 WEBSITE 💻

——————————————————————————————————————————

📨 GET IN TOUCH 📨

——————————————————————————————————————————

📍 SUPPORT OUR MINISTRY 📍

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Sorry, but you make no sense right off the bat. Atheists don't bring up evolution. Why would we? You don't have to accept evolution in order to be an atheist, and lots of religious people _do_ accept evolution. That's because evolution is biology - _science_ - not religion. Evolution has nothing to do with my atheism.

The only reason evolution comes up in religious discussions _at all_ is become some particularly clueless Christians hate it. And sure, rational atheists generally accept the scientific consensus. We might push back on the especially clueless claims of creationists, sure. But evolution says nothing about the existence of a god or gods. It really has nothing to do with atheism.

OK, I'm a little further along in the video now - almost one minute (heh, heh) - and apparently _you're_ one of those clueless Christian creationists, huh? But again, evolution has *nothing* to do with my atheism. I was an atheist before I'd ever _heard_ of evolution.

And even if you _could_ conclusively disprove it (which is, quite frankly, silly to even imagine), that would do absolutely _nothing_ to my atheism. After all, in order to demonstrate that a god exists, you'd have to demonstrate that a god exists. In order to demonstrate that creationism is true, you'd have to provide good evidence that creationism is true. Disproving evolution would do _none_ of that, even if you _could_ do it (which we both know you can't).

OK, this is just getting silly, now. Yeah, I made it a whole 70 seconds, and you're already getting too silly for _me._ If you want to argue evolution, then argue with biologists. Because they say you're full of crap. Even _Christian_ biologists say that.

I'm not a biologist, so I'm not interested. I understand science well enough to recognize that the worldwide scientific consensus, wherever there is one, is always the best bet. Even if evolution _didn't_ make perfect sense to me - and it does - I'd still accept the worldwide scientific consensus. I accept it tentatively, of course - just like scientists do. But even _I_ can tell that you're full of crap when it comes to evolution, and again, I'm not even a biologist.

So, if _this_ is the kind of silly stuff you've got as "evidence for God's existence, " I don't think that the rest of this is going to be worth my time.

Bill_Garthright
join shbcf.ru