NASA Announces STAR TREK WARP Engine Powered by Antimatter Changes Everything!

In this jaw-dropping announcement, NASA reveals that they have developed a new engine design that is powered by antimatter!

This is a HUGE deal, as this new engine will enable space travel at speeds never before possible.

Subscribe: @techarsenal118

[sandiadelsol]

Anti matter is an idea all an idea needs is belief and action. Anti matter is possible with the right team to create warp drive. We need to work together to create warp drive!!

[adamkhan]

I think this artical doesn't talk about warp drive but using antimatter to physically propel space ships close to light speed. I think warp drive is a concept whereby space itself is moved around the spacecraft which would effectively solve the issue of not being able to travel beyond light speed.

[toddhubbardguitarmaker]

Well how do we know if we are matter? What if we are anti-matter? Does it matter?😂

[czarcastic]

NASA can’t even build a space suit or a rocket engine that works

[arttuvesterinen]

Michio Kaku spoke, about those matters like he was right there when the bang happened.💥

[printerman]

don't forget, Star Trek also uses Dilithium Crystals .

[yhoda]

um warp engine do not propel you, they move space around you. Using fuel to propel you isnt a warp engine.

[noreply]

Dude, that is so yesteryear, there is no matter, only data manifested by consciousness.

[arthurzettel]

The stronger the warp field, the faster you go. It's just that simple.
Warp 1 = 1.50 times light speed
Warp 1 = 279, 000 miles per second
Warp 2 = 3 times light speed
Warp 3 = 4.50 times light speed
Warp 5 = 6 times light speed
Warp 6 = 7.50 times light speed
Warp 7 = 9 times light speed
Warp 7 = 1, 674, 000 miles per
second is 47.66 light years traveled in 1.50 years

[LiamDebono]

From stars to .. burgers xD i did not see that coming haha, who else?

[timothyparker]

Once you have a spaceship going past the speed of light you can scoop up antimatter by the ton

[smb]

Ridiculous click bait. No "anti-matter" engine is in use or even being designed because, uh, we don't have a nifty little supply of anti-matter.

[peterpalumbo]

You would need a warp bubble to protect from high g's, much higher than 1g.

[Fuji-Kengamine]

Thank you for your detailed explanation.
we still have a long way to go in determining what the basics building blocks of matter in the universe are.
I know a practical method of warp drive
based on its basic principles.

[borusa]

It's nice to dream but lets focus on sorting our planet out.

[bobpawtucket]

One problem is in quantum physics only one particle can hit another and the most power that can be applied will accelerate the hit particle to the speed of light . One particle can drive another one to hit another, but their force cannot be combined . You cannot use 2 particles together two get double the force!

[vanikaghajanyan]

In fact, the idea of a warp drives does not stand up to any criticism already within the framework of solutions to Einstein's equations.
0.Well, what if you really want to but "can't"?
1.Everything is much simpler: all the bodies on the basis of which starships can be constructed have mass, and therefore a gravitational field.
2.And if we find out what the gravitational field* is, then we can create a detector that could absorb this field around the entire perimeter of the ship.
3.It is clear that then the spaceship would become "invisible" to the rest of the gravitational masses and, moreover, the absorbed energy of its own gravitational field can be used to accelerate the ship.
4.By the way, if we are talking about aliens here, then according to eyewitnesses, their ships are glowing, which can be interpreted as the effect of transforming the UFO's own gravitational field into
useful energy.
5.The ship will look like a UFO not only to observers, but also to all gravitational masses: the general background of gravity will perceive the ship as an alien object and will push the "stranger" out of its environment.
6.Since the background is heterogeneous and not isotropic, the ship’s auto-pilot will be able to assess the situation, maneuver the accumulated energy of the ship's own field and choose the planned route.
7.It is clear that the accumulated energy and the ejection energy are not negative.

*) - “Visualization” of space-time is currently possible.
0.Apparently GR was an
overlooked QG:
this assumption follows from the Schwarzschild solution and can be tested experimentally in the laboratory at the moment.
1.The gravitational radius (or Schwarzschild radius) is a characteristic radius defined for any physical body with mass: r(G)=2GM/c^2.
Consequently: with indicating the mutual quantization of the mass (energy) and space-time: m(0)/m(pl)=r(G)/2r(pl)=n, where n-total number of quanta of the system; the tension vector flux: n=[(1/4π)(Gћc)^-½]gS ( const for all orbits of the system: n=0, 1, 2, 3....).
2.Moreover, the parameter r(0)=r(G)-r(pl)=(2n-1)r(pl), defining the interval of the formation of the system, at n=0, when r=r(G)=0 (for example, the state of the "universe" before the Big Bang) turns out to be a quite definite quantity: r(0)=-r(pl).
In the area [(-rpl) - 0 - (+rpl)] there is an implementation of external forces, "distance": (-rpl)+(+rpl)=0 (≠2rpl).
3.On the Kruskal diagram of the hyperbole r=0 corresponds to the true Schwarzschild feature, the features V and VI are not even covered by the global (R, T)- space-time and correspond to the "absolute" vacuum; then the singular areas above and below the hyperbolas r=0 can be formally treated as the energy source (external forces).
That is, the frightening "true singularity" is actually a superconducting heterotrophic "window" between the proto-universe (the source) and physical bodies (not to be confused with wormholes, it's more like grounding from electrical engineering).
4.As a fundamental theory, GR has the ability with just one parameter: r(G)/r=q to predict, explain new physical effects, and amend already known ones.
Photon frequency shift in gravitational field Δw/w(0)=q;
the angle of deflection of a photon from a rectilinear propagation path =2q,
the Newtonian orbit of the planet shifts forward in its plane: during one revolution, a certain point of the orbit is shifted by an angle =3πq, for a circular orbit (eccentricity е=0); in the case of an elliptical orbit - for example, for perihelion displacement, the last expression must be divided by (1-e^2).
5.The parameter q is not necessarily a measure of the deviation of the metric from the pseudo-Euclidean one, since in the quantized phase space q=πr/L, where L is the length of the phase path and πr^2=r(G)L.
6.GR/QG predicts a new physical effect:
w/w(pl)=q; expression for gravitational radiation from a test body.
7.This is amenable to physical examination in laboratory conditions at present.
8.From this, generally, from Einstein's equations, where the constant c^4/G=F(pl), one can obtain a quantum expression (as vibration field) for the gravitational potential: ф(G)=(-1/2)[Għ/с]^½ (w)=-[h/4πm(pl)]w.
9.Final formula:ф(G)=-[w/w(pl)]c^2/2, where ф(G) - is Newtonian gravitational potential, r(n')=nλ/π=(n+n')2r(pl)l , the corresponding orbital radius, w - the frequency of the quanta of the gravitational field (space-time).
10.Obviously, the quanta of the field are themselves quantized: λ=(1+n'/n)λ(pl) = 2πc/w, where n'/n=M/2∆m: system gravity unpacking ratio, n'- the orbit number (n'=0, 1, 2, 3…).

[Frenetic]

I’ll believe the hype when NASA can build a craft that can land on the moon like they supposedly did 60 years ago.

[tml]

What isotope would be the best to extract the antimatter from ??

[jrluckett]

What's up with your audio levels?