THE GOSPEL OF MARK PART ONE By PAULA GOODER

[theologiecatholique]

The best video I've seen on Mark until now. Merci beaucoup, dear Paula.

[nikiforosvakalis]

Thanks for providing all the historical and comedy movies from the best comidians of greek theatre.

[a.t.]

An excellent introduction to the gospel of Mark. The first and most exciting of the gospels

[MadderPrinciple]

Brilliant - best I think I have listened to, thank you!

[crownsoutreach]

I enjoyed her thematic analysis of the three major groups through the Gospel of Mark.

[kevinarmstrong]

As someone who is trying to find faith after 50+ years of drift, I find Paula's teaching to be extremely helpful and informative. She has certainly given me the appetite to search for more of her work.
One small criticism of style if I may: why not use the pronoun "it" rather than relentlessly saying Mark's Gospel, sometimes 3 times in the same sentence!?

[stephenatkins]

and the same traditions you cited about John-Mark being the author also state Matthew was the earliest and 1 has even Luke coming before Mark.

[MegaBoog]

Thank you, this video helped to explain a lot of the questions and calm a lot of the concerns I had about this first book of the New Testament.

[sebolddaniel]

"Go tell!" Such irony. Brilliant analysis

[markspassion]

Paula Gooder is a gifted teacher.  Her exposition of the date of composition of Mark's Gospel is valuable; also her description of how the eyewitness testimony in Mark is the eyewitness testimony of Peter.  Mark served as an aid and interpreter for Peter for several years before Peter was executed by the Romans after the Fire of Rome in 64 AD.  For more on this check out Dr. Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses.  Also my historical novel, Mark's Passion,  may be helpful.  It is the story of Mark the Evangelist and how he put the Gospel in writing.  Gene Vanderzanden, author of Mark's Passion.

[chrystheo]

It would be much nicer if the speaker's eyes "looked" in the direction of the viewer. It would make the viewing experience very personal Thank you.

[NjeruThandi]

The link requires that I sign in. There's no option for registration either.

[philschielke]

Of course for the first 1700+ years, the church concluded that Matthew was written first. Why can't Mark be a condensation of Matthew? Oh, and where is 'Q'?

[mariopantoja]

The scribes and the Pharisee 😡
The crowds 😲
The disciples 🙄😑😒
... according to Mark 🤔

[williamlipsett]

We must remember the attempts to translate Aramaic, Hebrew, and Greek into English from to totally different letter and word meanings which has proven at places almost maverick in meaning and or totally wrong as well . Best of luck to anyone studying in English translation and trying to make sense of it all . Learning these languages does have it's advantages .

[flop]

Women are not to teach/preach. Is that correct?
I am understanding that women can pray, prophesy, sing.

[brucefetter]

430 she says it is Matt that is longer, but that's a slip. It's Mark

[derekatkins]

It's interesting that this scholar suggests that the Gospel of Mark was written sometime between A.D. 67 and A.D. 73, because if Mark is indeed based on the teachings or recollections of the Apostle Peter, then we have problems with a date of A.D. 73, or even A.D. 67, for Peter's martyrdom is typically dated even earlier, to A.D. 64.  Thus, Peter's martyrdom points to a date sometime in the early 60s for the writing of the Gospel of Mark.

[MrDubjim]

Dennis R Mac Donald in his book "The Homeric Epics and the Gospel of Mark" makes a very good case that Mark was writing fiction. Jesus based on Homer's Odyssey.