Understanding Unexpected Guid Change During a Linq Request

Discover why unexpected changes in a Guid happen during a Linq request and learn how deferred execution affects the evaluation process in C-.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: Unexpected Guid change during a Linq request

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Understanding Unexpected Guid Change During a Linq Request

When working with C- and LINQ, developers sometimes encounter unexpected behavior that can lead to confusion. One common issue arises when a Guid unexpectedly changes during a LINQ request, especially when using deferred execution features. In this post, we’ll break down a specific code snippet that illustrates this problem and provide a clear explanation of why it happens.

The Problem: Changing Guid Values

Here’s a snippet of code that presents the issue at hand:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

In this code, you might be surprised to see that the RequestId for instances of TestNewGuid appears to change. Let's dig into the reasons why this occurs.

Understanding LINQ and Deferred Execution

What is Deferred Execution?

Deferred execution in LINQ means that the actual execution of the query is delayed until you enumerate over the collection. This can lead to unexpected behavior if you're not aware of it. In the provided code:

The Select method does not execute immediately; it sets up the query for later evaluation.

The LINQ methods essentially create "instructions" for how to process the data, which are only executed when you iterate over them using methods like ToHashSet() or First().

Why the Guid Changes

Now, let’s break down what happens in this specific code:

When you create requests using Select, you are defining a query to create new instances of TestNewGuid, but no instances are created at this stage.

The line that calls ToHashSet() actually triggers the evaluation of the requests enumerable. At this point, new instances of TestNewGuid are created, and each new instance generates a new, unique Guid for RequestId:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

When you later call First() on requests, it triggers another evaluation of the requests enumerable, and again, a brand new instance of TestNewGuid with a fresh Guid will be created.

Summary of Execution Flow

Deferred execution occurs: When you define requests, no Guid is generated.

First evaluation: Occurs when you call ToHashSet(), generating a set of fresh Guid values.

Second evaluation: A second call to requests.First() creates yet another instance of TestNewGuid, resulting in a different RequestId.

Conclusion

To avoid issues related to deferred execution, it’s essential to understand when and how your queries are evaluated in LINQ. Generally, if you need the same set of data across multiple calls, consider materializing the data into a list or an array immediately after construction, using methods like .ToList() or .ToArray():

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This way, you can ensure that all subsequent operations work with the same instances of TestNewGuid, thus maintaining consistent Guid values throughout.

With this understanding, you can navigate LINQ with more confidence, avoiding pitfalls related to deferred execution. Happy coding!