filmov
tv
Mitsubishi Outlander vs Hyundai Tucson Crash test
Показать описание
2022 Hyundai Tucson vs Mitsubishi Outlander Crash test NCAP, Euroncap, ANCAP, IIHS,
Tested Model Hyundai TUCSON 1.6 T-GDI HEV GLS, LHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2021
Kerb Weight 1633kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all TUCSONs
Class Small Off-Road
The passenger compartment of the TUCSON remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to the legs of occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver’s chest was marginal. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the TUCSON would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, good or adequate protection was provided to most critical body areas. However, driver chest protection was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points for this part of the assessment. The TUCSON has a centre airbag to mitigate occupant to occupant injuries in the event of a lateral collision. In Euro NCAP’s test, the airbag worked well, with good protection of the dummies’ heads. Limitation of the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the car in a side impact was rated as adequate. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated marginal whiplash protection. The TUCSON has, as standard, an advanced emergency call system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also applies the brakes after a collision to prevent secondary impacts.
In the both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the TUCSON is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car. Good or adequate protection was provided to the head of a struck pedestrian over most of the bonnet surface, with some areas of poor protection on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test locations. However, protection of the pelvis was predominantly poor. The autonomous emergency braking system of the TUCSON detects vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. The system’s response to pedestrians was adequate and to cyclists was good.
TESTED MAKE / MODEL Mitsubishi Outlander
LS RHD
TESTED VEHICLE(S) BUILT 2021
TESTED BODY TYPE Medium SUV
TESTED VEHICLE ENGINE 2.5 litre petrol
RATING PUBLISHED January 2022
The passenger compartment of the Mitsubishi Outlander remained stable in the frontal offset (MPDB) test. Dummy readings indicated ADEQUATE protection for the driver’s chest and lower legs, and MARGINAL protection for the upper legs. Protection of the front passenger dummy’s upper legs was ADEQUATE with GOOD protection for all other critical body regions.
The front structure of the Mitsubishi Outlander presented a moderate risk to occupants of an oncoming vehicle in the MPDB test (which evaluates vehicle-to-vehicle compatibility), and a 1.75 point penalty was applied.
In the full width frontal test, protection of the driver dummy was GOOD for all critical body areas. Protection of the rear passenger head and chest was MARGINAL, while protection of the neck was ADEQUATE.
In the side impact and oblique pole tests, protection offered to all critical body regions was GOOD and the Mitsubishi Outlander scored maximum points in these tests.
The Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a centre airbag to protect against occupant-to-occupant interaction in side impacts, however it did not meet the ANCAP airbag coverage requirements and a 1 point penalty was applied.
Prevention of excursion (movement towards the other side of the vehicle) in the far side impact tests was assessed as GOOD for the vehicle-to-vehicle impact scenario and ACCEPTABLE for the vehicle-to-pole scenario.
Help us grow by supporting us:
#outlander
#tucson
#crashtest
Tested Model Hyundai TUCSON 1.6 T-GDI HEV GLS, LHD
Body Type - 5 door SUV
Year Of Publication 2021
Kerb Weight 1633kg
VIN From Which Rating Applies - all TUCSONs
Class Small Off-Road
The passenger compartment of the TUCSON remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy numbers showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger. Hyundai showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to the legs of occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver’s chest was marginal. Analysis of the deceleration of the impact trolley during the test, and analysis of the deformable barrier after the test, revealed that the TUCSON would be a moderately benign impact partner in a frontal collision. In the full-width rigid barrier test, good or adequate protection was provided to most critical body areas. However, driver chest protection was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of compression. In the side barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate. In the more severe side pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored maximum points for this part of the assessment. The TUCSON has a centre airbag to mitigate occupant to occupant injuries in the event of a lateral collision. In Euro NCAP’s test, the airbag worked well, with good protection of the dummies’ heads. Limitation of the extent to which a body is thrown to the other side of the car in a side impact was rated as adequate. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric analysis of the rear seats also indicated marginal whiplash protection. The TUCSON has, as standard, an advanced emergency call system which alerts the emergency services in the event of a crash. The car also applies the brakes after a collision to prevent secondary impacts.
In the both the frontal offset test and the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both child dummies. The front passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward-facing child restraint to be used in that seating position. Clear information is provided to the driver regarding the status of the airbag and the system was rewarded. All of the child restraint types for which the TUCSON is designed could be properly installed and accommodated in the car. Good or adequate protection was provided to the head of a struck pedestrian over most of the bonnet surface, with some areas of poor protection on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians’ legs at all test locations. However, protection of the pelvis was predominantly poor. The autonomous emergency braking system of the TUCSON detects vulnerable road users, as well as other vehicles. The system’s response to pedestrians was adequate and to cyclists was good.
TESTED MAKE / MODEL Mitsubishi Outlander
LS RHD
TESTED VEHICLE(S) BUILT 2021
TESTED BODY TYPE Medium SUV
TESTED VEHICLE ENGINE 2.5 litre petrol
RATING PUBLISHED January 2022
The passenger compartment of the Mitsubishi Outlander remained stable in the frontal offset (MPDB) test. Dummy readings indicated ADEQUATE protection for the driver’s chest and lower legs, and MARGINAL protection for the upper legs. Protection of the front passenger dummy’s upper legs was ADEQUATE with GOOD protection for all other critical body regions.
The front structure of the Mitsubishi Outlander presented a moderate risk to occupants of an oncoming vehicle in the MPDB test (which evaluates vehicle-to-vehicle compatibility), and a 1.75 point penalty was applied.
In the full width frontal test, protection of the driver dummy was GOOD for all critical body areas. Protection of the rear passenger head and chest was MARGINAL, while protection of the neck was ADEQUATE.
In the side impact and oblique pole tests, protection offered to all critical body regions was GOOD and the Mitsubishi Outlander scored maximum points in these tests.
The Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a centre airbag to protect against occupant-to-occupant interaction in side impacts, however it did not meet the ANCAP airbag coverage requirements and a 1 point penalty was applied.
Prevention of excursion (movement towards the other side of the vehicle) in the far side impact tests was assessed as GOOD for the vehicle-to-vehicle impact scenario and ACCEPTABLE for the vehicle-to-pole scenario.
Help us grow by supporting us:
#outlander
#tucson
#crashtest
Комментарии