Calculating π by hand: bonus k=1 working out

preview_player
Показать описание
Chudnovsky algorithm by hand bonus: k=1

This is all the Chudnovsky algorithm set-up for k=1. Including a better approximation of sqrt(10,005).

Watch the main video:

This video was filmed at Queen Mary University of London.

CORRECTIONS
- None yet. Let me know if you spot anything!

Thanks to my Patreon supporters who enable me to spend a day doing a lot of maths by hand. Here is a random subset:

Christopher Samples
Sean Dempsey-Gregory
Emily Dingwell
Kenny Hutchings
Rick de Bruijne

Support my channel and I can make more videos:

Music by Howard Carter
Filming and editing by Trunkman Productions
Audio mastering by Peter Doggart
Design by Simon Wright

MATT PARKER: Stand-up Mathematician
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

15:39 “that 2 on the end is going to become a 1”... :(

TomazzA
Автор

The fact that this has still only got 52629 view is a travesty.

Literally cannot tell you how helpful it is to have Matt mutter about numbers on one screen while I write on another :D

ikchess
Автор

Hey, a really great formula I like to use for approximating square roots

, /x~,/p + x-p/2, /p

Where x is the number you are trying to get the square root of and p is the nearest perfect square to x

PS (, / - square root sign) ( / - normal division sign)

radioactivespaghetti
Автор

204 positive thumbs and 0 negative ones and counting...

marijnl
Автор

He didnt shorten 720 and 6 omg Imma kms

aleksamihajlovic
Автор

"just wasn't that well attached to the wall if i'm being honest"; even the second time, that made me laugh my ass off

VideosRunescapeu
Автор

Is it driving anyone else nuts that he doesn't just divide the 720 by 6 straight away?

lnorlnor
Автор

Matt: the semi bald man who steals whiteboards

TooManyEditsProductions
Автор

This really brings in to perspective just how remarkable modern computing power is.

origamikatakana
Автор

I think you have stumbled upon a a new mathematical axiom...
Parker's Pi Series Postulate :
Convergent series for Pi which are easy to calculate by hand do not converge quickly.
Convergent series for Pi which do converge quickly are not easy to calculate by hand.

steveb.
Автор

At 1:20 you did wrong yhe sum. 5+3=8, not 12?!?!?!

enricgarrigasanchez
Автор

Have you heard of cancelling the six with the 720 and a factor of ten - not sure you've done much hand calculation recently LOL

johncrwarner
Автор

When doing the final subtraction, shouldn’t it have been a zero in the ones place, as you were taking 1.3... away from 2?

Edit: just watched the rest of the main video, where you address it. Nevermind 😄

Retsbew
Автор

You did the second term on the second channel please tell me your not going to do each term on their own channel. 🤣

GriffenKing
Автор

13:53 look how well the cup and the table border matches, I've honestly thought that the cup was transparent

HissingStone
Автор

Don't you just love when the mathematical reasoning has "-ish" at the end of the sentence! my favorite way of doing maths!

dalitas
Автор

1:45 why not divide 720 by 6 to get rid of the 6 at the bottom and then just get

seangrand
Автор

Fractions are your friend; the calculation for y would have been easier (albeit only a bit easier) if you had used 3/8000 instead of 0.0003125

angrystickfig
Автор

I had to pause the video at “the board... just wasn’t attached to the wall very well, if I’m being honest, ” because I was laughing too hard.

General_Nothing
Автор

My Maths teacher used to say, believe in division and not multiplication... if you had in the part when dividing the numerator and denominator, if you cancelled the 720 and the 6, you would have gotten simplifying alot of the work BTW AWSOME VIDEO AND AMAZING MATHS !!! LOVE IT

rituchandra