Moving back to Full Frame from Medium Format

I am considering a move away from medium format landscape photography back to full frame. My main reason for this consideration is the lack of telephoto options for the Fuji GFX camera system. In today's video I discuss the possible pros and cons of shooting with a Nikon Z7II, a 24-120 lens and a 100-400mm lens.

*SAVE MONEY*

You Might be Interested in These:

The Gear I use & Used to Make These Videos. 𝘛𝘩𝘦𝘴𝘦 𝘢𝘳𝘦 𝘢𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘬𝘴.

The Music in These Videos from Artlist & Epidemic Sound: 𝘢𝘧𝘧𝘪𝘭𝘪𝘢𝘵𝘦 𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘬s

#LandscapePhotography

[timryan]

I use all 3 main brands- I prefer certain sensors and lenses for very particular work. For landscapes, architecture and low light, I reach for my Nikon Z7 and S lenses for the ergonomics and the lens resolution and contrast. I prefer the RAW files from the Nikon for that kind of work. All of the camera systems today are all really excellent- you can’t go wrong with any of them. It’s all about finding a system that is a pleasure to use and gets you motivated to create.

[GarryM]

There are no bad cameras and can all do the job. I love my Nikons but they’re not for everyone however really pleased for Nikon and the Z system that’s finding it’s feet. I especially love the lenses and my 70-200 2.8s

[petripuurunen]

Interesing change ! As a landscape/studiophotographer I see no real difference between current models from any manufacturer. Its just which do you want to use, ergonomics etc... Image quality is on par on every pro-full frame camera - what comes to landscapephotography. Interesting to hear your future experiences. I did compare side-by-side GFX100R to A7r4. Yes, lot more pixels (to print) but end-customer will not notice the difference. As you said; only the photographer can enjoy the pixels!

[MrFL]

I made exactly the same move, well almost, GFX 50s & r to a Z7 / Z7II. The 24/120 is the best lens I have ever used and the image quality of the Z7 vs the GFX is so close that in practical terms you won’t be seeing the difference.

Nice one Thomas

[Jokemeister]

A person can know all the technicalities but without an eye for composition they will always struggle to achieve what you seem to be able to with ease. You are an inspiration....thank you.

[brianmccutcheon]

It never ends. I love my Pentax cameras. K1, K5 and even the K10 D, they all put out sharp images and take a wide variety of lens that swap about.

[Trish]

You are spot on Thomas, you can’t spend your life comparing our lives to others or we will never be happy! Enjoy the new Nikon!!

[martin]

I think everything you said was spot on. Most modern pro or semi-pro cameras are pretty much on part with each other, but the lenses, that is a different story. I've used the Sony a7riii the last few years for landscapes and really have enjoyed the results. But again it's the lenses that make such a huge difference. Even regarding print size, when stitching images (if done correctly), can produce huge file sizes for super large prints (if anyone ever wanted one). Plus, merging photos together helps a lot with sharpness in the foreground and background. And 99 times out of 100, no-one is going to notice the difference anyway. When you consider the history making images of the past, their cameras were nowhere near ours, yet have stood the test of time.

[sanclewphotographic]

Hi, You are the best Photographer on YouTube and elsewhere by a country mile, so we are all hanging on your every word for the results and comparison between the two systems, and also looking forward to your Scotland trip, regards, Colin.

[SimonBaxterPhotography]

Many thanks for the exhibition shout-out, Tom. So pleased you enjoyed it! We have prints from a 24mp A7ii and they've rendered beautifully. Anyway, you know my feelings on the subject - I've had the same camera for almost 5 years 😁

[teenylank]

So cool that you and Sean Tucker just hang out!

[MatthewRaifman]

I think you’re on point here. I shoot the Canon R5 with among other lenses the RF 100-500. It’s a phenomenal set up and I’m happy with it coming from the Nikon d850, however, the dynamic range isn’t quite as good. So for you, the Nikon is a good choice. I went with the R5 because the autofocus is much better for wildlife than anything Nikon has on offer except the huge and expensive Z9. The Bird Eye AF on the canon is extraordinarily. But for just landscape, I would have gone with the Z7ii. Enjoy!

[peterfritzphoto]

Good move, Tom. Looking forward to receiving and framing your delicious prints. I, too, want a 992 GTS...

[MichaelCantwell]

I've been doing travel and landscape with the Nikon Z7II for about a year now. I've had the 24-120 for several months and rarely took it off my camera on my recent trip to Europe. I love that lens. I went back and forth for months between the Fuji 50R and the Z7II and I'm happy with my choice. I hope you will be as well. I heard you on an interview when you spoke about possibly changing to the Nikon and was surprised. Good luck. The 20mm is a killer lens too.

[FaithandFun-wq]

Wow impressive, well done. Thank you for sharing. Keep it up 💞

[JayFunningham]

I just upgraded from my Nikon D600 to the Z5. Both great cameras but the modern technology, features and ergonomics of the Z series has been wonderful for helping me get great images much more easily. Ease of use can produce more great images in the long run than higher quality equipment.

[jerryeisner]

I love all your videos no matter what you do! I think I know why as well, because you tell the truth about what your doing. You come across as someone who really likes and enjoys sharing your knowledge and who freely admits that you don't know everything. You are humble and talented, funny and enthusiastic!! You are AWESOME!! je

[davidbiddlecombe]

Welcome to the world of Z7 landscape photography. I’ve been using the Z7 (mark 1) for a couple of years now, having shifted from Fuji XT-2 and I absolutely love it. I doubt that you will be disappointed. I have the 14-30 f4, 24-70 f2.8. & 105mm f2.8 Z macro. The 24-120 wasn’t available when I got my Nikon, but I’d be tempted by it today.

[Zieloniwpodrozy]

Yes, when it comes to hiking in the mountains, as you often do, saving weight is important. That's why I like my a7c, because it's very light and easy to fit in a backpack. Of course some people need higher resolution, but 24 mpx is enough for me. I think you'll be really happy with your choice of the z7 II. Great resolution, amazing dynamic range and that 24-120 lens seems like an amazingly versatile lens. One lens to do 80% of the work.

[mpactdesignmedia]

I used to shoot with a Canon 5D MKiii - I switched to Nikon D810 several years ago and have never regretted it. Canon makes a GREAT camera, and for video - to me - they are still king! That said, the dynamic range between the D810 and the Canon in the photo arena was miles apart and that is what sold me. When I raised shadows, the image still looked great. When I cut highlights, the image still looked great. Well beyond what my 5D MKiii images would allow.

I am one day away from jumping to a Z camera after a long dragging my heels period and am also getting a 24-120 lens (along with an ftz adapter). This all decided before finding this video today. I can't tell you how excited I am one of my faves - T Heaton - is now also using a Nikon. Cheers!!