Why I Am a Hyper-dispensationalist (5) - Peter S Ruckman

Peter Ruckman was a very influential Baptist preacher and the founder of Pensacola Bible Institute. He is best know for his stand on the King James Bible. What he is lesser known for outside of Baptist circles was his very intense opposition to Mid-Acts dispensationalists. He called those that believe as we "The Dry Cleaners." This has always been a mystery because he didn't believe water baptism was necessary for salvation, so what exactly is water cleaning?
The reason that this study looks at his teaching is because it influenced so many of today's Baptist preachers, and it is many of those teachers that now criticize our beliefs.
What is rather stunning is that for someone who was so adamant about the 'inspiration' of the King James Bible, he played rather fast and loose with what it says.
First, he changes the words of the KJB to satisfy his beliefs.
Next, he ignores the words of the KJB, along with the context of to whom it is speaking to object to our beliefs.
Then, he changes the plain meaning of a word to place the beginning of the body of Christ at the cross.
Finally, he absurdly puts forth that the body of Christ had been formed and was growing for many years before God let anyone know about it.

The link below is to his message:

[aktrapper]

Hyper-dispensationalist = another Gospel.

[robcbuell]

Ruckman was on another level. He was a brilliant Bible-believer

[mashariel]

Something that occurred to me this week, Messiah told "Peter" אבן That he would be the "Stone/Rock" that he would build his assembly upon.

Matthew 16:17-19

Peter "The Rock" warned that if one does not know the Thurah/Law/Instructions "Paul's" writings would be confusing.

2 Peter 3:14-16

"Christianity" went and built their house upon "Paul" in confusion, not because Paul is wrong, because they lack context, because they do not understand The Law (Psalms 19) or The Language... which in my view is why they profane both in apostacy.

IMPORTANT: Peter distinguished between Pauls "writings or epistles" and Scripture and said the unlearned would pervert his writings AS THEY DO THE SCRIPTURES to their own destruction.

Worth considering. Shalum.

Love & Respect, All-Ways

🔥💙👐🏽❤️🔥

[mashariel]

I have not been influenced by Peter Ruckman, never heard of him until you mentioned him sir (speaker).

I stopped at 4:15 to write this comment. Dispensation is not necessarily a period of time - as a linguist words matter and their meanings, their ROOTS. To dispense is "TO GIVE", yes any action requires time as a gumball machine needs time to DISPENSE the candy... what is being received is the point, not the time it is given... first error in theology of "Dispensationalists".

Your servant, Nazyr to YHUH Tsavoth, Mashariel-Eshi

[laststarfighter]

I've had 2 different questions from 2 different accounts deleted from here.

Please, God, please let this get through. I have an honest and ignorant question that i desperately need answering.

[mashariel]

Why do "Dispensationalists" ignore EZEKIEL 18???

[timchess]

God explains to us what the gospel of the circumcision and the gospel of the uncircumcision meant right in the context. He put in a parathesis to explain what is meant in Galatians 2:7, in the following verse, Galatians 2:8. Here is Galatians 2:7 and then God"s explanation of what it means in Galatians 2:8, right in context, right in the next verse!
Galatians 2:7-8 (KJV) But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;
(For he that wrought effectually in Peter to the apostleship of the circumcision, the same was mighty in me toward the Gentiles:)
Peter "to" the uncircumcision and Paul "toward" the Gentiles, or "toward" the uncircumcision. They were preaching the same gospel as evidenced by Peter speaking for ( in favor of, agreeing with it) Pauls message of grace in Acts chapter 15. But Paul"s primary calling was to the Gentiles, and Peter's primary calling was to the Jews. But Paul also preached to some Jews and Peter to some Gentiles. It was not an exclusive calling, but a primary calling of Paul to Gentiles and Peter to Jews, but both with the same gospel. Which is why Paul said in Romans 1:16
Romans 1:16 (KJV) For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.
THE gospel of Christ is THE power of God unto salvation, to the JEW first and also to the GREEK, or THE power of God unto salvation to the CIRCUMCISION first and also to the UNCIRCUMCISION. THAT IS WHY PAUL SAID IF ANYONE ELSE PREACHED A DIFFERENT GOSPEL TO LET THEM BE ACCURSED AND EVEN CUT OFF, OR DEAD. BECAUSE THERE IS ONLY ONE GOSPEL OF SALVATION NOW THAT IS THE POWER OF GOD UNTO SALVATION, WHETHER TO THE JEWS (CIRCUMCISION) OR GREEKS (UNCIRCUMCISION). PETER PREACHED IT PRIMARILY, BUT NOT EXCLUSIVELY TO JEWS AND PAUL PREACHED IT PRIMARILY, BUT NOT EXCLUSIVELY, TO GENTILES.

[bfree]

I know the answer to title of this video : Because you chose not ton beleive the Scriptures for what they say, but you'd rather go with the philisohies of man.

[RealEschatologyGuy]

What Ruckman missed is what I just recently realized. For the four decades that I've been studying end time prophecy, never once did it occur to me that this current "Church Age" or dispensation of grace where we Gentiles are offered salvation and purpose outside the ministrations of believing Israel and outside of the operation of the Law IS NOT FOUND IN PROPHECY. Was Ruckman wrong in his assessment? He MISSED something important, so...

[uswvme]

What’s this “THE Greek and Hebrew text” you’re referring to as being superior to the KJV? How do you know what’s superior when you’ve likely never seen *ANY* Greek or Hebrew manuscript in your entire life? Which Greek and/or Hebrew manuscript is better? Can you even read Greek & Hebrew?

With that being said, I commend you for approaching the issue as ‘head on’ as you could possibly do so without utterly losing your entire congregation.

[mashariel]

4:50 Where does it say that "Paul" was the only one to see the BODY? Its stated clearly in what you call the OT if one understands Hebrew and what is encoded within it... so many bad assumptions.

[TrustChrist]

You can be saved off what Jesus said in John 3:16

[Chief_Of_Sinners]

So, not watching, but is the #1 reason: "Because I don't read my Bible?"

[edcarson]

😂What a poor attempt to put your point across and a great example of your lack of Bible reading and understanding .

[russhall]

So you don't believe the Bible? Then why in the world are you teaching xxtrying to teach a book you don't believe?