You Might like Superdeterminism, But Here Are its Biggest Problems!

This video spells out the biggest problems with Superdeterminism. Where are the hidden variables? How is everything correlated?

[blijebij]

The foundation of reality can not be tested. Sad but true. Wil always stay philosophical.

[septillionsuns]

superdeterminism is the transubstantiation of physics.

[Razor-pwxn]

Some say that the correlation comes not from the big bang but from the configuration of the experiment. For example in the ERP experiment, where Bell's inequality is apparently violated, the correlation is initiated somehow between the particles and the measuring device. The same as in a polarizing filter or a beam splitter and perhaps also in the way an interference pattern is constructed. In such a way that the measuring device is in synchronization with the particle generator. Rather than synchrony, it would be an inevitable temperature correlation where the particle is absorbed in an ideal way, which after being measured would change its state. Hypothesis which I do not believe.

[stevemaurer]

Superdetermanism is not my favorite either, but these arguments against it can be applied to >>ALL<< QM "interpretations. That's what makes them interpretations rather than theories.

So Arvin is going to have to come up with something better than this.

[IzySly-gh]

Superdeterminism and free will are entangled and both are in superposition and the waveforms have yet to collapse

[christophermullins]

Arvin is superdetermined to determine if superdeterminism is real.

[gustamanpratama]

What about Quantum Darwinism and QBism, do we have any chances to test them in the foreseeable future?

[aarionsievo]

Wait. In general, a superdeterministic theory could be tested, if the relationships between initial state and measurement were predicted by the theory. Of course one could construct an untestable theory, but that is possible for every class of theory (deterministic, random, or whatever).
Also the same "not testable" problem also arises for other interpretations of QM, including the Kopenhagen mess.
But do not trust me. Sabine Hossenfelder makes this quite clear in her videos on the topic.

[cestlavie]

I can prove superdeterminism exists. It’s also influenced by energies in real time to cause specific outcomes.

[Wstarlights]

There is literally no way to determine in the universe that any one ISN'T one' or that any one' isn't one — therefore a one that is one' and any one' that is one is the only mathematically determinable thing ANYTHING universally is — meaning any superdeterministic force in or of one would ubiquitously be omnisuperdeterministic — meaning it's an absolute irrelevance to anything but the chooser what they choose — apple, banana, orange — the universe will retain homeotstasis.

[maxsrandomvideos-]

There are things in life that can steer certain outcomes to be something particular BUT there are also aspects of randomness that seem to appear as well. In the end it is biocentrism and there are a multitude of potential outcomes for everything but how things take their course is how it’s determined. Time only exist because we do

[zairmorningstarmusic]

we got it all wrong lol we got a blurry picture of the universe with general relativity and the big bang but not a clear one. we need new physics although it’s right it’s not true. confuse not these two

[ormonde]

The early conditions of the "Big bang" are now up for grabs, as predictions of this theory have come under scrutiny from the "James Webb telescope" discovery that early galaxies are far more mature than was predicted 🤔

[deepdragon]

Here is a short for tubothinking.... if I live and breathe...

[danebryant]

Almost everything you said is incorrect. The unrealistic approach is the assumption that measurement doesn’t affect the physical measurable. The only reason it is not observed in the macro world is the effects are small compared to fidelity of the measurement. All measurement are intimately connected with the measured and with a chaotic process This is not assumption; it is fact. Take temperature reading it will affect the temperature your measuring. This true of all measurements. Your rebuttal is flawed in other ways as well. However, this space is not sufficient enough to fully address. Do not take this comment as criticism of you or your channel . Thank you for doing it. I think you are awesome presenter . That is the reason I subscribe. Please keep doing it. I just strongly disagree with this post. 😊

[Edi-j]

Free will allows.. rules.. use, abuse.. determine facts is a line to live on with variables of Free will....or sumthing like Heisensergs uncertainty.living on a growing tree trunk ? Sumone make sense of this in maths & another step taken.❤

[KendraAndTheLaw]

Hilarious that physicists think they have Reality figured out.