Two Simple Reasons Why We Can't Solve Quantum Gravity?

[hitmanfromjapan]

Amazing how many people in the comments have solved it 😅

[Apeiron]

Scientists : gravity is weak
Gravity : bitch, I hold galaxies together, I stop light in its tracks, I cause fusion....

[philanimanqele]

I'm definitely in the wrong class

[BlackyBrownDestruction]

Gravity will be measured with spacetime waves someday

[aps]

What if the assumption is wrong to begin with i.e. gravity is unique and therefore can’t be quantized. All the efforts are leading to dead end.

[IWillSayMyPeace]

The image with which this short opens is extremely wrong. It implies a direction, up / down in space. A flat earther sees such images and asks how come people in Australia don't fall off, etc. That image is a knucklehead image. Gravity pulls towards the CENTER of an object, NOT DOWN!!!

[danielnuncio]

Don’t worry guys I’m almost done with the equations to break reality and all will be good, just got some PreCal assignments to finish and I’ll pick up where I left off. 👍

[garylizard]

I couldn't see the problem just by looking at the equaton

[edinfific]

I see a problem any time I see even slightly complex math formulas.
And my mind blanks at that part.

[BlackRaven-we]

Isn't gravity the curvature of spacetime produced by mass? I think I have understood it that way. 😮

[richardcottone]

This small video actually made the subject much more understandable

[bl]

Just remember with a tiny magnet picking up a paperclip, you can overcome the gravity of the entire earth pulling that paperclip down with that tiny magnet in your hand. Thankfully so, mobility would be nonexistent if it was stronger

[mikkel]

Not strange Einstein and Bohr disagreed

[allankerr]

I sometimes wonder why gravity is shown as a 2D representation and objects are sitting on a flat plane! It’s the same whenever a black hole is depicted, the body would surely be distorting and pulling at space time from all directions, towards the centre of the body and not show everything rolling towards the bottom, like a bowling ball on a rubber sheet which is rather silly as this is completely misleading, quite frankly I would not give this example to a primary school child, this is perhaps why it seems non intuitive, surely this would be a far more accurate way to present the effects of a body on spacetime, to make it far more understandable, as I’m sure you are aware of, not to be disparaging, I do wonder if it’s a matter of pop science like Neil degrass and Brian cox perpetuate, and the assumption that if we show the whole picture, then it loses the “awesome mystery” of the universe or we mere mortals simply would not understand, I have a lot of respect for Arvin in the way he does simplify complexity, but this does need to be clarified as it is a fundamental principle that other principles are based upon

[IamSkyeOrion]

It sounds like gravity is a consequence rather than a force.

[electricAB]

Please! It’s not about “believe” 🤬🤯
It’s about evidence and an open-ended understanding.
It’s science for f’sake!

[coolcat-nqmj]

Gravity is just a thing, why do you even need maths for it lmao? The only gravity equation that seems some what useful is the Gmm/r^2 one

[titussteenhuisen]

On one side space time, is it possible to link matter with time gravity? Than link space-time with gravity-time?

[donleavell]

Arvin, when you say, gravity is a feature of space, and we must agree, that means apparently that it is emergent from the space time and occurs during the inflation ?

[bnjm]

So, perhaps Quantum Field Theory is the key to blending quantum gravity and General Relativir, since gravity is curvature in quatum fields of space, of the fabric of space. Quantum gravity is likely curvature in extra dimensions of qiantum fields.