Gavin McInnes EXPOSES the American judicial system 😬

preview_player
Показать описание

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

And NEW YORK changed the LAW to allow this case to go forward.

cjb
Автор

Not to mention it was a civil not a criminal case rape was never charged😅😅😅😅 the burden of proof in a civil case is ridiculous

Chris-dygw
Автор

Everybody who was involved with that should be in prison

MikeYoung-posh
Автор

Most importantly, he was NOT found guilty of rape. They got him on defamation for publicly calling her a liar.

JunkAccount-igst
Автор

You can sue Trump for breathing and win in NY.

TheHouseofChameleons
Автор

His biggest take away from Gavin's message was the dog's name.

unc
Автор

It describes how nuts she is. It's the reason why 70% of the country doesn't believe in any of this BS.

WarfighterKilo
Автор

During E Jean Carol's interview with Cooper she stated that she thought grape was sexy and Cooper shut the interview down immediately. Go back and find it, it's there for everyone to see how truly crazy she really is. Who in their right mind says shit like that?

LKCLifer
Автор

He was charged with defamation for denying the claims of a lunatic. Nothing to see here folks.

donpowers
Автор

She "won" a defamation case. It's been appealed, she'll walk away with $0.

EN-qhss
Автор

She's crazy and he clearly makes that point.

gabriel
Автор

He story of the supposed incident with Trump matches an episode of law and order SVU

MSUChris
Автор

Exactly right. This case would never see the light of day except Trump. Needs to be overturned.

MrRight-fjyi
Автор

Didn’t they also extend the statue of limitations too in NY state ?

smitty
Автор

The only part he acknowledged was the dog's name. Totally proving the point about him being R worded

anthonylara
Автор

She’s not even Trumps type. Hell she’s no ones type. She’s so unstable she would definitely lie about something horrible for money

tonymonxana
Автор

She did accuse her uncle and exboyfriend of rape

anncorr
Автор

She had 0 witnesses. The only “witness” was someone she claimed she phoned afterwards and told about what happened and somehow that was accepted as “witness testimony” despite it being hearsay.

yesman
Автор

When?
They put their friends and family on the jury.How is that fair??

ajalbrecht
Автор

He did not get the name of the dog showing what kind of person the owner was ! What great misjustice .

codewalters