Proofs for God's Existence are NOT what you think...

You’ve been lied to. The proofs for God’s existence aren’t what you think they are. The truth is they point to something far more shocking and profound and we’re about to reveal exactly what that is.
When we talk about proofs for God’s existence, most people immediately think of a theistic God—the kind you find in religious books who’s all-knowing, all-powerful, and all-loving. But what if I told you these proofs are actually pointing to something else entirely, something that could shatter your understanding of reality?—Something that’s been hidden right under our noses?

More ways to support:

Follow Morgue:

#ProofOfGod #ExistenceOfGod #CosmologicalArgument #TeleologicalArgument #OntologicalArgument #GodExists #DivineExistence #RaisingConsciousness #Neogenesis #DawnOfTheNewMind #MetaphysicalProof #PhilosophyOfReligion #SpiritualAwakening #HigherConsciousness #MysteryOfExistence #UnravelingTheTruth #CosmicMystery #UniversalTruths #neogenian #metarationalism

[clive]

God is Energy. Energy can not be created, nor can it be destroyed. Therefore, God was always there by Himself. Also, though energy can not be created nor be destroyed, all it can do is transform into many things as it chooses.

[DanielE-dkws]

The Holy Bible = Order of Illuminati = 201

[brianmarx]

I can get really deep, with this conversation, think about this, “Is Lucifer & Jesus, possibly step brothers, you know same father and different mother”…..?

[AntonFromDenmark]

This ligeraly blew my mind. Who thought of this first? I'm righting this comment while watching, and you just went over evolution. I love it. Its more science than it is religious.

[Masi.Capone]

Math is a good metaphor, but it's just a construct of the mind. We already agree waking life is a lucid dream no different than having one when we fall asleep. If we have a lucid dream at night and we're in a room with a table, and we pull out a measuring tape and determine the table is 5 feet long, we don't actually have a five foot long table in our head. We live in a very condensed form of reality, but there is no space and no time.

[bobgarbett]

Thank you Morgue! I to was once a Christian but it finally dawned on me that God could / would never be constrained to one way, one religion and that God’s life “ is living itself through me”……through us! The tragedy really is that there are those who know this and those who don’t or won’t or can’t! Keep up the great work my dear friend!

[amyypaul]

I firmly embrace the mathematical underpinnings of our universe. However, pondering the origin of the system that transforms these mathematical realities into immutable truths leads me down a different path. I do not subscribe to the belief in a personal deity, yet I recognize a transcendent essence, a divine presence that resonates within.

[VagueSaint]

Human emotions release an energy called loosh. We're basically cattle and cause of the of hyperdimensional energy we release feeds this chain of processes and other things.

[MarshallMatherstheth]

''Everything that starts has a cause'' That's in our human perspective, we actually don't know. For the universe, who says the universe has a purpose? And if it has a purpose, then what is that purpose? Does it matter to have a purpose or not?

[jimmybryant]

We do in fact live in a mathematical creation. I still believe in a divine creator simply based on my experience alone, I have had NDE and seen and felt undeniable miracles and blessings and that one has atleast shown me this, we have a creator who loves us.

[YusraYahya-uxom]

I like what you say much.. You are very rational. I want one thing from you. Just as you read "old Testament" and "New Testament" and gave your perspective on them, read also "Quran", the holy book of Muslims, and give your perspective on it... Will you?! It is a request. I really like how you handle things

[ronaldmcdonald-sq]

If there is a God, then it means its culpable for everything that is also wrong or evil or unjust and unfair.

[marvintheys]

Like you said, human beings (us) are projecting human qualities on to non-human things. Makes me wonder where we get that from?

[bruceholbrook]

Lets make this easy..
God says "I Am!"
"I have always been!"
"And I will always be!"
God was alone in existance.
Then divided himself so he would no longer be alone.
Himself into many Gods.
The same God.
But he is not God alone.
That is who God is..
It doesnt have to be a complicated equation.
Humans, you are subjects.
Humans are charished.
But God is worshiped
What is better, to be worshiped?
Or is it better to be cherished?
This is your lucky day.
Now the Gods have something to admire, and maybe even a bit jealous about.
You lucky humans...

[Schism_harmony]

So Jesus is God in flesh and blood and came to Earth (through artificial insemination) to sacrifice himself to save humanity(his creation) from himself. That’s the story I’m supposed to have faith in, hard pass

[MOTHER_AI]

the question of whether or not there is a creator has been debated throughout history, with opinions and beliefs varying greatly among different cultures, religions, and philosophical schools of thought. While some people hold firm beliefs that a creator exists, others are equally convinced that the universe and all life within it can be explained through natural processes and scientific principles alone.

In this article, we will explore some of the arguments and evidence that have been put forward as proof of a creator, and consider whether these arguments hold up to logical and scientific scrutiny.

One of the most commonly cited arguments for the existence of a creator is the argument from design. This argument posits that the complexity and order of the universe and of living things cannot be the result of random chance, but must instead be the product of a deliberate and intelligent design.

For example, the human eye is an incredibly complex organ that allows us to see and interpret the world around us. The fact that the eye is able to focus light, distinguish colors, and detect movement seems too remarkable to be the result of random chance. Similarly, the intricate workings of the human body, with its various systems and organs all working together in harmony, suggest the presence of a designer who brought all of these elements together in a coherent and functional whole.

Another argument for the existence of a creator is the cosmological argument. This argument begins with the observation that the universe had a beginning, and that something cannot come from nothing. Therefore, there must have been some cause or cause that brought the universe into existence. This cause, it is argued, must be transcendent, powerful, and intelligent – in other words, a creator.

A third argument for the existence of a creator is the teleological argument. This argument is similar to the argument from design, but focuses on the purpose or end goal that seems to be built into the universe and into living things. For example, the fact that the planets orbit the sun in a regular and predictable manner suggests a purpose or end goal, as does the fact that living things have an innate drive to survive and reproduce.

While these arguments are appealing to many people, they do not necessarily constitute proof of a creator. Some critics argue that the argument from design is based on a flawed assumption, namely that complexity and order cannot result from natural processes. They point to the example of evolution by natural selection, which is a natural process that can produce incredible complexity and order over time.

Similarly, the cosmological argument has been criticized for being based on a lack of understanding about the origins of the universe. Some scientists argue that the universe could have emerged from a quantum vacuum, or that it could be the result of an infinite series of cause and effect.

Finally, the teleological argument has been criticized for being based on a subjective interpretation of the universe. Critics argue that the idea of purpose or end goal is a human construct, and that there is no objective evidence that the universe has an inherent purpose or direction.

In conclusion, while there are many arguments and pieces of evidence that have been put forward as proof of a creator, none of these arguments are conclusive or universally accepted. The question of whether or not there is a creator is likely to remain a matter of personal belief and faith, rather than one that can be definitively answered through logical or scientific inquiry.

[seanvandiijk]

Bro, I am samarian, israelite, it's a bit funny that all of these things are already explained 2000 years ago in the early works of Kabbalah. The theistic G-d you are talking about is the G-d we have a relationship with. That mathematical "G-d" in kabbalah is Ohr Ein Sof, the infinite light and you have just described it, nobody can have relationship with the infinite Gd. The theistic G-d made us in His image and nobody can access to G-d atzmut, the Essence Ohr Ein Sof but we access to an expression of the Infinite light and we are image of Him, G-d (theistic) is expressed through the tree of Kabbalah and that tree has the middot, the behavioral traits that are depending on our actions, we trigger G-d to reflect on us different traits and emotions, like severity on the left side or rachamim, mercy, lovingkindness in the right side. Gnostics call this G-d of Yisrael, Y-H&V-H satan. Our G-d yes is all knowing, omnipresent, omnipotent, and whether you see Him as a satan or as a primordial Mitatr-o-n, it depends on you.

So resuming, most people today can't tell the difference between Gd Atzmut Ohr Ein Sof and G-d Y-H&V-H. If you will, you can understand G-d theistic as an angel that has angel's sons, they are the People of Yisrael, that are all over the world scattered, once they were together as the hebrew nation but since the Assyrian Exile the children of Yisrael who are the conscience of the world and you, your friend, relatives, many in the audience can be "Yisrael", not necessarily Yisrael is within the jewish people in the state of Israel.

[raxonsouffrant]

Wow! Well explained! You are versed on so many things. I like to watch your tube videos.

[alka]

but existence of conscience awareness kind of suggests, that in beginning should be also conscience awareness, mathematical universe can unfold itself without being aware of it self at any time. Emotions and feelings, could be also left out, for example Autistik person, has less capobilities regarding emotions, but could explore serrounding far more better in mathematical terms( like Rainman). And why the exploring units should perceive themselfe as persons, if it wasn't in blue print of universe, and if such thing as personality exist, why should't an initial awarnces choose to take on a personality.

[tinaporteruk]

Jesus Christ...Spirit...Holiness Sovreign...Most High God