Physicist Explains the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics

The #2022 #nobelprize in #physics showed profound results in #quantum mechanics. Proving experimentally that #einstein and John Bell's hypotheses about quantum #entanglement was wrong. #science is fun :)

A lot of people are not conceptualizing Entanglement correctly, so I thought I would make a video!

#subscribe for more #steam content & #podcasts

Additional information about the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics:

[mysteriousmate]

glad you cleared this up, because I have heard so many talk about info transfer. Correlation makes more sense.

[GEMSofGOD_com]

Please, do tell more about the principle of locality! And thank you for AMAZING SHORT presentation!

[blackbassuc]

Everything reacts to it's own laws and we are not privileged enough to understand all of those laws for every variation of interaction...

[mekingtiger]

This to me doesn't seem entirely solved: I can totally accept that no "information" is travelling faster than the speed of light, but that first depend on what one means by "information" in the first place. Sure, if we place two entangled particles at a HUGE distance away from each other and then someone at one of these places makes a measurement, it is not possible to know who triggered the collapse of the entanglement by making the measurement first - hence no readable information being transfered. However, it still seems like _causal influence_ is being transmitted between particles... somehow. The only way I can imagine this not being the case is if the values of the particles have been already predetermined before measurement was taken and no FTL needed... but that, again, does not seem to be the case.

So that to me doesn't solve the EPR Paradox. If anything, it only makes it more confusing altogether. How can nonlocality NOT be in violation to Relativity?

[IndigoMasonll]

When you reverse your train of thought, you'll always find yourself where you began.

[amlanpritamparida]

I just created that same setup, and checked the violation of the Bell's theorem in the form of CHSH inequality, well the funny thing is that i made it as a project in my school's science exhibition and no one could understand anything clearly 😂

[kirksatterwhite]

I’m still confused. If the particles are in superposition then whatever property is being measured is undetermined until the actual measurement, correct? If that’s the case then how can the entangled particle, which is also in superposition, not have info given to it when its paired particle collapses? How else would it be the correct entangled property if it depends on the other particle’s determination at the point of collapse if no info is transferred. I’m not arguing btw, I just want to understand it.

[arationaldivineoutline]

What exactly would be the difference between information transfer and information correlation? How can you further specify past the connotation of words?

[Cruno-gv]

Hey what does Hidden variable really means?

[ValensBellator]

Is it possible to influence it in such a way that is detectable in its counterpart? Can they both be observed individually? The concept is so confusing but it does seem like it would allow for some sort of instant informational transfer across any distance via simple means like morse code or binary. Why would that not be possible?

Just wondering. It’s all so far over my head 😂

[Solidd-Melb]

If they are randomly correlated, no information transfer, then there's no entanglement and hence no locality.

[Oms-xkzb]

What do you exactly mean by correlations?is it same like some kind of connection between these quantum particles?

[GEMSofGOD_com]

Finally, understandable! And short! To clear up: how can these properties "be found to be perfectly correlated" when "two entangled particles will *randomly* [?] correlate" at the measurement? As I understand it, they are "boosted" with initial data, drifted away, and then, based on this initial data's function in time will give us corresponding results at the moment of measurement. Correct? I hate 99% physicists for messing up with something as understandable as that when it's in fact super simple. What about Wolfram's estimation for the speed of entanglement (10^110 - 10^130 STL) - is it about errors that add up to correlation at the moment of entanglement? To me, it now looks like!

[GEMSofGOD_com]

So, does breaking the principle of locality now simply has proven experimentally to us that, while making measurements, we can think of something possibly being somewhere that is/was correlated? It actually seemed undoubtful to be beforehand, but I'm very smart

[swishonu]

The fact that he is so certain of his opinion convinces me that it is likely untrue. If entangled particles are simply demonstrating a correlated relationship... than you can not say the particles were entangled in the first place.. so the principle of locality was not violated.

[bakacomo]

In the double slit experiment it’s said the electrons go back in time once observed and become solid instead of a wave all in the past

[ValidatingUsername]

Imagine the algorithm promoted your content associated with your name and degree over qualified individuals who don’t have one but read more books and have more patents

[MrNice-zmqk]

Thx for breaking it down. Btw. the video you where "mentioning" doesn't tell ftl communication is possible. It actually comes to the same results you do.

[brettgainsford]

Still can’t get my head around it.. like I get it, but what does it accomplish??

[Artur-dydr]

How is this new information? This sounds exactly as I remember it was before. Watched it twice, all the points have been known since theory was established. Can someone point it out?