Quantum Entanglement: 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics

#QuantumEntanglement #nobelprize #BrianGreene
The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded to Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger for their groundbreaking work in Quantum Entanglement. Here is a brief visual summary of the essential physics.

#Science #WorldScienceFestival

[vaishnavinagrale]

I have deep interest in quantum physics and technology, and this Nobel Prize encourage me to dig deeper in this field...
Congrats Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger.

[Petticca]

Thank you for the mini presentation for context. I love when public educators understand that incredibly complex ideas aren't intuitive to grasp for those without the education background in physics/mathematics.

Giving a very basic breakdown of the breakthroughs that led to current understanding is vital for those of us who are fascinated and want to learn about complicated areas of knowledge, but would not be able to grasp much without that surface level understanding of how scientists know the things they do.

I am grateful to be able to watch content like this and increase my understanding, even slightly, and my enthusiasm greatly. Thank you.

[nyworker]

The fact that reality starts as something probabilistic and non-deterministic which evolved into the determinate and predictable is perfectly intuitive.

[tipeneoxenham]

Kia ora Brian, thank-you very much. I look forward to you unravelling entanglement even further. Your gift of encapsulating and communicating extraordinary difficult physics to laypeople is so helpful. What a wonder of a time for physics this is.

[universecode]

Thank you Dr.Brian Greene. I have been reading your book-'The fabric of the Cosmos'-really interesting. Thanks to you, I can be available to understand about Physics including the Quantum mecahanics too, even though I am not professional this field. Thank you so much.

[FreeIrelandCountyRepublic]

I'll never understand why nobel don't award these prizes posthumously.

That was a remarkable piece of work by John Bell, he should be recognised today as a Nobel laureate along with the 3 experimentalists that confirmed his work.

[ToasterBrain]

The best science educator out there. Great Channel!

[NichaelCramer]

There are a couple issues that needs to be corrected here.

1] Despite the fact that it’s constantly repeated in the popular media (as it is here) Einstein’s objection to QM never was based on its probabilistic nature. Instead, it had to do with the inherent non-local nature of the theory (I.e the inescapable “action at a distance”).

2] Likewise, an equally problematic issue is the way in which these objections are depicted (and simplistically dismissed) as if Einstein was just “wrong”; I.e. he was simply too dense or to out of touch to “get it”.

But the fact remains that Einstein was, in a fundamental sense, correct here.
That is: although it is, of course, true that Bell, Aspect, et al have demonstrated the QM (and the universe) behaves in this non-local way, anyone who isn’t deeply amazed or bewildered by that fact is very much missing the point.

(Or as Feynman said: “Anyone who thinks they understand Quantum Mechanics hasn’t had it explained to them properly.”)

[johnPaul-qndg]

John Bell was nominated for the Nobel but unfortunately he died of a stroke in 1990, he really should have been awarded it earlier, but as an Irish man we are still proud of him.

[umeshchandramakwana]

Excellently explained, I always love your explanation!

[captain_context]

AS 95% of these science videos starts out in the 1920s and build up to present Using THE ENTIRE VIDEO to tell us things we hear from EVERY video, and the remaining 10 seconds on getting to the actual point.

[keepcalm]

We expect a long and engaging interview of the laureates here on this channel.💝🙏🙏💝

[sfbuck]

but Einstein wasn't wrong when he said our understanding was incomplete. Einstein's theories didn't stop being useful when quantum physics came along, so why would you think that means quantum physics is the final word? because it works? except when it doesn't...just like relativity. there's something more going on that we aren't seeing.

[tiagogoncalves]

So the more we know, the less we understand and the less we really know. This is fascinating!

[philomat]

Thank you Brian Green! I loved your presentation . But I can only wish for more explicit descriptions of your expression "rolled out" at 6:42 : does it mean that Einstein's intuition was proved to be wrong?

test establishing to most people's
6:40
satisfaction Einstein's conventional
6:42
view of reality is rolled out that
6:44
quantum entanglement is real and more

[fabiocaetanofigueiredo]

None of this would have been possible without J. Bell's work. He should be one of the winners.

[alanbrady]

I love this channel thanks professor Greene

[rin]

Although i did not understand most of what u have said but it gave me goosebumps multiple times our world is too great to be a mere coincidence

[temelturan]

My feelings for the presentation is perfect, I understood very well why they given the prize to these 3 clever minds.

[madandu]

Now more curious about the spooky-behaviour. Hope to see an another video specific to this Nobel-prize achievement.