How The SpaceX Starship Will Bring People To Mars!

preview_player
Показать описание

Last video: Why The Tesla Bot Will Take Over In 2024!

Welcome to the Tesla Space, where we share the latest news, rumors, and insights into all things Tesla, Space X, Elon Musk, and the future! We'll be showing you all of the new details around the Tesla Model 3 2023, Tesla Model Y 2023, along with the Tesla Cybertruck when it finally arrives, it's already ordered!

#Tesla #TheTeslaSpace #Elon
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I'm 70, and yes...
I've seen it all when it comes to NASA spaceflight.

A wise man told my younger engineer self
"No project was ever on time or in budget,
and yours won't be the first"
😎

Hurricane
Автор

In this day and age, initially sending humans to Mars seems quite primitive. Robots and AI should be the first to go there and get things started. That’s a no-brainer.

PhillipDavisMarketingSolutions
Автор

Elon said he's sending 5 ships with cargo only 2026 and 10-20 ppl in 2028 with 10 ships in 2032 will be the first big crossing.

joeywilliams
Автор

I hope no one has an emergency that needs an operating theatre or an ICU. It's going to be like the wild west frontier out there.

paulmurgatroyd
Автор

Next 30 years of my life are going to be very
What a time to live....

jaiminpatel
Автор

Russia, China, India and others have awaken the thought of space travel. Exciting times

Starship
Автор

I have seen enough sci-fi movies to know that one person will go crazy and kill everyone😂

waskus
Автор

It is doubtful whether we will be able to see this in our lifetime great fan from India

itsmesharath
Автор

Let me offer another scenario, the Artemis project slowly dies over the next several years because of ever increasing costs. SpaceX starts parking some Starships in orbit and includes a few tanking depot ships for intermediate fueling. If supplies develop in a reasonable time frame to provide fuel on the moon, then Starship will use the Moon as the source of fuel and oxygen for transit. If not, Starships will be loaded with fuel around Earth from the depot ships.

A few or more of the Starships will be sent to Mars with fuel, robots, starlink satellites, basic building structures, solar panels and electric supply infrastructure, raw material building supplies, human tools, basic construction materials and supplies for future and current use. A couple of Starships will land and start building the needed infrastructures for future flights inbound via the Starship will be able to leave successfully. These robots will also setup a Starlink hub to support the training of robots via Dojo for tasks that had not been considered. There will be some robots that will be using the provided research equipment for local weather operations, water and mineral research and regolith stabilization for further building.

In orbit a Starship will launch Starlink satellites to improve the communication from/to Mars to current standards. There will be other need support actions to assure more options for efforts on Mars.

Why do I think this? Look at what NASA has been able to do with funding constantly in doubt. They think small because they can count on small commitment. Other national type space ventures are into being the first and not thinking of developing a new world of people. Look at SpaceX. They are building Falcon 9's as quick as they need to and are still building Starships and Boosters at an incredible rate and they haven't even put one into orbit. I know they will shortly because they did it with Falcon rockets. Does SpaceX have do only one thing at a time? Does SpaceX lack funds to do what they set out to do? Will they adapt rapidly to meet new challenges? Their goal isn't money, fame or power. Their goal is to make mankind multiplanetary. And they don't go halfway. Elon keeps the focus and Shotwell keeps the practical costs before Elon's eyes.

I am not against NASA but the use of commercial rockets was the best thing that they did because it moved the costs away from a cost plus system to a responsible costing of projects. Eating costs makes commercial production be more realistic and not depend on political motivations. NASA has very good people but the motivation is not in a focused manner. SpaceX has a dream and this cause inspiration that is catching on to people like happened with the Apollo mission but not depending on political whims as much.

leesargent
Автор

Living on Mars has got to be better than living in what's going on these days

zmblion
Автор

not the hunger for exploration drives the humanity, but the hunger for profits by using new resources, and finding new places to loot 🤣🤣

ciorchinos
Автор

It's makes no sense to pursue a Mars colony when they haven't even been able to do so on the moon.

rjm
Автор

Mars missions have been dreamt about since forever.

leonardgibney
Автор

Is there a video on the long duration life support systems for these flights?

mpdunner
Автор

They just need to build a spacecraft that has an artificial gravity wheel so that way they have gravity while they're traveling to mars

theshimario
Автор

I fully expect Artemis-V to be the last launch of SLS if it lasts even that long. By then, Starship will either be man-rated for all phases of the flight or relegated to cargo and replaced by something else for transporting people. The disparity of launch cost between SLS and SH/SS on an "Earth gravity well departure" basis will require SLS be phased out ASAP. None of that addresses the cost per ton delivered to the surface of Mars. Those costs will favor Starship even more steeply.

In short, NASA cannot afford SLS.

frankmcgowan
Автор

Going from the moon to Mars is forgetting that it has to come from the Earth to the Moon - factor that in and it’s clear that Earth to Mars is easier.

peterclarke
Автор

NASA can't get there without SpaceX. SpaceX can't get there without NASA.

JonnoPlays
Автор

I don't get why they don't build a space cruiser. 50 x the current size of the biggest rocket. All countries and private companies can bring cargo and they can fly the cruiser to Mars. Assemble the cruiser in space from empty Starships.

bredemeijer
Автор

Im all for starship its one hell of an idea and i want it to work out. The number one downfall i see is landing. Without a pad i would say labding on any celestial body is going to be so hard not to mention they srent even working on landing it right now they want to catch it which is cool too but idk. We all seen the concrete tornado

zmblion