Neil Tyson explains objective truth to those who can’t grasp

[ElParacletoPodcast]

He is proving it, because everything he is saying, is his subjective opinion.

[atothetop]

This is the common dogma of transcendental realism.

[papacreams]

So. A man named yeshua (jesus in aramaic) existed around the year 1 AD and died around 35 AD and was a carpenter by trade, thousands of people saw him, hundreds follwed him, and saw his resurrection. Youre telling me hundreds of people had a schizophrenic episode and experienced a hallucination? I mean sure it seems stretched but real people that existed actually saw this.

[niconestra]

When you ask a question and the person says, To then you can stop talking with them.

[morgandunn]

There is still some sort of manifest in the mind that describes something that exists. So really no human can be such a machine, and even an emotionless robot has to have both a way that it got the information and undoubtedly a way it perceive it with its circuitry as it analyzes and/or perceives it.

[wilmercastillo]

You can only establish an objective truth if there is something outside of us dictating these objective truths i.e God

[lakshmisharma]

Well I will say that depends on epistemology, science focus on nature outside it deal with nature.But there is one think called conciousness, which means it may outreach natural so does science discover that and how can science says that only nature is objective truth, may objective truth outgrow nature

[cassiewilliams]

So is what he's saying objective truth ??

[Olena.Osilo]

Lying is immorality wrong, how does science make it objectively true or false?

[ElParacletoPodcast]

This is bull, all thinking is subjective, because it all comes from inside.

[rolando]

You can also persuade them that Jesus is their savior by threatening them with eternal conscius torment. Fire works better than water.

[DarksideGmss]

Just because something can be proven does that then make it true?

[HarleySG]

If science proved beyond doubt that Buddha was the only true god, would you still believe?

[simuljustusetpeccator]

God is the creator of all the universe=Absolute

[cassiewilliams]

But there are some things in science that requires belief, like the big bang theory, no one was there to see it but you believe that it happened....

[SoiBoi_Kelda]

Question for today: how is relativity true, if quantum physics clearly disproves it(and vice versa)?

Read Thomas Kuhn for answer.

[omar]

Science don't deal with if something is truth or not

[randypuckett]

A scientist who's not sure about God because he has no objective truth for the existence of God will probably never let himself believe in God; because his scientific study won't give him permission. The best evidence for the existence of God will never be logic or science but simple faith. I don't have to convince others about the existence of God. Because he is God he puts in every man a splinter in the brain that none of us can remove. We have to think about God. Whether we believe in him and say so or fight against the thought of His existence, we all think about God. Even Neil

[Mk-Gamer]

so does religion not have any objective truth??