144hz VS 240hz VS 500hz MONITOR Comparison (Nvidia source)

preview_player
Показать описание
144hz VS 240hz VS 500hz MONITOR Comparison (Nvidia source)
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Lmao, its like the 30 vs 60 vs 144 hz comparisons but with switched numbers

inqizzo
Автор

Imaging buying 500hz monitor to play with ping of 200ms XD

PlushRei
Автор

Can tou do the same but with 240 fps vs 200 fps this is really important for me

Kagami_techs
Автор

Most reviewers mentioned how imperceptible or minimal 144 vs 240hz is, but this makes the differences glaringly obvious especially for esports.

CALISUPERSPORT
Автор

People online are very odd. I have read multiple times how the differences between both are very small, and you won't notice, yet I can easily notice the difference in this vid. I have a 180 Hz screen I use, and I'll be upgrading to a 240.

ascendediam
Автор

Thanks man. Just got a 480hz. I hit shots in cs2 that I couldn't with 240hz

day_walkar
Автор

Me watching this on 70hz monitor😭🤣 i died before i saw the kayo

kitara
Автор

I have 144hz monitor reach 130fps, but got 190ms i still got delay right?

baphometrag
Автор

Imagine a 500hz monitor back in the 1870's?

kennysponto
Автор

У меня возникает стойкое понимание, что это обман маркетологов. Да, у 144 Гц будет более дёрганная картинка в покадровом воспроизведении, но он она не может отставать в каждый момент времени. Это же маркетинговая чушь))

Creaker.
Автор

Yooo what is 144 now the standard 😭😭😭😭

Tdrowos
Автор

After all comparison vids I have watched, it looks like 240hz is the sweetspot here. Something above 240hz looks like overkill.

Matt-vh
Автор

Видео абсолютное не правда, вводящая в заблуждение, не важно сколько у вас гц 60 или 500, все кадры окажутся на одной линии к определенному моменту, если представить линейку, и брать см в расчет, то каждые см все кадры от 60 до хоть 10000гц должны быть на одной линии, только вот 60гц идёт немного отставать, но к определенному моменту он должен быть на одной точнее и цикл повторяется, не могу найти нужные слова два объяснения, в Ютубе есть канал который посвятил длинный ролик на эту тему, тут же на видео мы видим что 500гц всегда впереди, такого не бывает

ffeeman
Автор

And then there are people still playing with 60hz ...

jshin
Автор

i cant imagine what kind of pc you need to have 500hz in valorant

wat
Автор

i got a 60 hz refresh rate and its still looking more smoother than the video 😂😂

AlanZags
Автор

A completely ridiculous video. Hz only provides clarity in the streaming image. There's no such thing as a man leaving the wall too early. If the delay times are equal in both images, you will get the same image. When the Hz is high, you will only see the man's output fluently, that's all. These images are completely deceptive. Server ping and screen lag will only allow you to see that guy early. If this Hz value is high, you will see this early. These are just commercial traps.

DexAGametv
Автор

Ahh yes. It will make a difference. Just think about technology doping. They ban stuff that gives you 2-3% at advantages. Small increases matter!

casper
Автор

i have 100 hz monitor but my fps 200 +

princesolanki
Автор

This is a crazy test! 60Hz to 144Hz is worlds apart! But 144Hz to 240Hz is like 7-8% difference which NOT much! 144Hz compared to 360Hz does make a difference ~13%! However 560Hz is crazy! It's just absolute precision (~20% or even MORE)!

I'D pick 180Hz monitor (close to 240Hz and 360Hz) or if I have the money 560Hz! 20% or even higher based on personal reflexes does MAKE a huge difference in performance!

manh-haimuller
join shbcf.ru