Communism explained like never before

A raw, no-fluff masterclass combining powerful philosophy with real-life tools to help you break mental barriers, think sharper, and level up fast—mentally, socially, and financially

📷 Instagram:

------------
Time Stamps
0:00 - Introduction
1:37 - Disclaimer
2:27 - Where it all started
8:46 - Philosophical foundations
28:23 - Key Thinkers
33:54 - Criticisms
42:24 - Ending Notes
------------------
#desiphilosopher #politics #philosophy

[DesiPhilosopher]

Kaafi woke dimag k logg apna biased mind yaha ghusedd rhe hai. They were not able to find any flaw in the lecture so they started targeting the 'Karl Marx ke wealth distribution ka concept' that I explored here. Claiming, Karl Marx never spoke about distribution of wealth.

For all those woke intellectuals who are asking me to do the homework instead. Here are some sources.

7:57 'kaccha' aur 'makaan' a mere parody that I wanted to slide in was taken too seriously...

To put things onto perspective, everything is a byproduct of capitalism be it
'kaccha' or 'makaan'

This was one of the foremost criticisms of Marx's communism, since regimes were not able to differentiate private property from public property & everything got jeopardized

This is why leaders like Stalin, Lenin & Kim were able to exploit their masses.

Agar itni hi crystal clear philosophy hoti toh majority communist regimes fail nahi krti

They accesed these loopholes

For all those claiming I am against communism, toh bhai merko Karl Marx personally one of the OGs lagta hai but thik hai, jiski jaisi soch

Karl Marx wrote about the distribution of wealth and income in his works, including The Communist Manifesto. Marx believed that wealth should be distributed based on need and ability, and that capitalism leads to exploitation and inequality.
Marx believed that wealth should be distributed based on need and ability. He believed that a fair distribution of wealth and income was unlikely in a capitalist society.

In Marx's explanation of functional income distribution, wages are given as a basket of goods needed for the reproduction needs of the working class. Profits are then the remaining part of income creation. Marx's explanation of functional income distribution has several theoretical and practical shortcomings.

Sources:
1. Husami, Ziyad I., 1978, “Marx on Distributive Justice”, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 8(1): 27–64.


Maanta hu kaafi logg apna dil de chuke hai sanam to some concepts, but itne bhi andhe na ho jao ki aga peecha kuch na dikhe. Aga thoda sa google search bhi kia hota toh :)

Regards

[adityakulkarni]

the answer is simple, even in the concept of compounding, interest can never be bigger than the capital and bigger the capital, bigger the interest bit still lesser than the capital

[siddheshhh]

7:56 totally false. Karl marx never said that your personal goods will be shared. He only talked about the private property that capitalists own like factories, farms etc. Because that was the whole point of capitalism. The one who owns the private property gets all the profit so to break this system, workers should own the private property so that all the profit which comes from the good they produced will benefit them and not any other person like a capitalist

[Valayy]

Rich people focus on multiplying (×) while the poor on adding (+)

[GloomyGlue]

Communism is close to impossible to implement. Even if you try to reach Communism via socialist routes, it will still be impossible to reach. And in current scenarios, the proletariats ( working class ) are not as oppressed as they used to be in 19th and 20th century. That makes more difficult for them to unite and gain class consciousness. Moreover, it requires some understanding of economics and politics as well to get aware about systematic oppression due to class system.
Only way it can be implemented via authoritarianism where a group of people takes lead of whole nation thus creating a dictatorship which often do social and economic experiments on people.

At maximum people might be attracted to Social democracy or maybe Democratic socialism after gaining some class consciousness.
There must be restrictive capitalism where government owns crucial sectors and Economy is governed by both private parties and government. Free market is a myth. Marx was not right about everything and Socialism is not limited to Marx

[GloryofUpanishads]

Why not a detailed video on advaita philosophy and vishishtadvaita 😊. Heard so much about these Philosophies.

[Darsh-pk]

you didn't even make the distinction of personal vs private property

Ex land owing vs owing a toothbrush

Communism is against private not personal property

Ps : im not even a communist/ socialist but was disappointed by you not even making this very basic distinction

[mannysmandatories]

Hegel is a chaotic writer. Some clarity and your point of you will help

[rohitmalhotra]

Rich people focuses on investment, wealth creation formula and beleive in high luxuries life and their economic background also strong and their plans and strategies always increasing wealth and just opposite poor people play emotional game also and blaming mentality and poor mindset about money and not focuses on multiple income sources...

[sudippaul]

The answer to the question of why the rich become richer and the poor become poorer is inheritance. If you are rich and able to maintain your assets your child will also get those assets. The same applies for the poor. The child of the poor gets the poorness from their parents.
If we stop inheriting things and the starting point of a rich child and a poor child would be same I think we can solve this

[quicklearner.]

Next video should be on realism, liberalism, constructivism, capitalism, and others.

[manansharma]

bro try keeping the thumbnails consistent for returning audience,
skimmed over the video twice before realizing it's yours and immediately clicked on it

[AyushmaanUpadhyay-zv]

8:25 The phrase (which faraz Bhaiya mentione)"the rich get richer and the poor get poorer" highlights growing economic inequality. In capitalist systems, wealth accumulation often favors those with existing capital, enabling them to invest and generate further income, thereby widening the economic gap.

Conversely, communist ideologies aim to reduce such disparities through collective ownership and equitable resource distribution. However, historical implementations have faced challenges, sometimes leading to different forms of inequality.

[Dr.D]

In China exotic animal eating was present(in B.C.E.) way before communism(but it also contributed).

[Stve]

Clear and insightful explanation of communism!

[CrispCasuals]

8:27 Because rich capitalist owns the means of production and the proles don't. Thats why no matter how hard you try all the wealth ultimately goes to the rich. We get to see rich is saying this phrase if we give all our omney it will ultimately comes to our pocket because they owns the production we dont. Our labour is being labeled under a brand name where all the profit goes to the promoter not to the workers.

[avilas]

8:27 My perspective is a bit different. Wealthy people don’t become richer and poor people don’t become poorer by default. When you say this sentence, you imply that the wealthy get rich at the expense of the poor. In reality, the speed of progress for the rich is faster than for the poor—that’s all. A human being is also a resource with potential, and the more someone utilizes their potential, the wealthier they become. Every wealthy person’s ancestors must have taken risks at some point. It’s just that very few people are able to take those risks, which is why even in the most communist countries in the world, financial disparity exists.

This is why, in Maslow’s pyramid, self-actualization is at the top and at the pointed end. In Darwin’s theory, this is referred to as "survival of the fittest." Power has always been concentrated in the hands of a few, and in today’s world, money is that power.

[HrishikGhosal-lt]

I'm a communist and I am happy to see that someone is talking about it in this present world where the inhumane Capitalism you Bhai, big fan...❤️

[SDR-frth]

Make a detailed video on "Notes From Underground"

[Ab-xvod]

One complete advaita vedanta philosophy for beginners