Karen Read back in court for hearing on allowing expert testimony

Karen Read back in Norfolk Superior Court for hearing on the possibility of expert testimony.

Twitter: @wbz

[lyzette]

This judge may as well be wearing a sign that says, “TEAM PROSECUTION”

[CantonAlexander]

Karen always looks so well put together. Love her

[SashaMalinina]

The way this attorney spoke to such a brilliant and respectful doctor is disgusting. He is the best thing that happened to the CW because I believe his condescending demeanor will be seen just as that through the eyes of a jury.

[gmann]

Prosecutor is grasping at straws and it’s so noticeable and the judge should be removed for her bias she is horrible

[kellegaus]

The prosecution is reaching soooo much because they have NOTHING. I have no dog in this fight but I do realize that a dog did inflict those injuries from the pictures and freaking common sense. This prosecutor is a joke. Team Healthcare and Scientific Research Analysis all the way.

[acc]

the defense knows they can’t win this case but they take karen’s money - she should try to make a deal and admit guilt.

[beverleymoore]

This is an embarrassment to the Judge and prosecution. The questions he is asking are completely ridiculous to what she is supposed to testify about. Pathetic

[MichaelLyons-pyfp]

Most biased judge I've ever seen.

[justmyopinion]

Please tell me why they don’t sit the O’Keefe family behind Karen.

[RestrictionsApply]

She is 100% guilty or she knows somebody that did it or she had something to do with it

[belindaziglar]

The Judge has to cut through the crap & drama and get to the truth!
No smoke& mirrors.

[ndamonathomas]

This prosecutor is good, but wait for Allan Jackson. They will be grilled.

[zcbzopg]

Has anyone actually measured the height of the tail light compared to the highest cut on the arm? Guarantee the upper bicep on a 6' 2" man is higher than the tail light...it was the dog.

[BamaMom]

I don’t know…. I think Dr. Russell is losing her steam. She has rumbling answers to some most fundamental questions. Of course she is smart, but not smartly prepared by the defense. I also don’t think she did enough due diligence which is making her look a bit inadequate. She keeps reverting to books and journals, and when asked a question from Brennan, give me one example on how the chain of custody could have impacted the evidence, she couldn’t give one? How about saying the use of solo cups. She doesn’t know the chain of custody from what I am hearing and she should know. Defense did nothing to prepare her. That’s my take.

[SanetLemmen]

I dont like this judge.New case, new judge.She is also involve.

[brandiwebb]

How, H O is it okay for auntie bev to be the judge again 🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠