Colorado ruling against Trump 'well-reasoned,' says former Watergate prosecutor

preview_player
Показать описание
Jill Wine-Banks, former assistant Watergate special prosecutor, says the Colorado Supreme Court reached the correct decision when it disqualified former president Donald Trump from holding office again based on the language of the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment.

Connect with CBC News Online:

»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Wow, the CBC is allowing comments? What if someone leaves a comment that may hurt someone's feelings?

perryelyod
Автор

Same people said the freezing a single mother's bank account because she gave some money to a protest that was legal at the time was well-reasoned.

Astorath_the_Grim
Автор

Im just shocked we can comment on this

deanmean
Автор

Corruption at is best … watch how they are so corrupt… 👏👏

martinberiault
Автор

Nice headline - glad to see the CBC is still reporting opinions (propaganda)

nolanofeast
Автор

"This was a good attack on democracy"
- CBC

letsgo
Автор

Won’t stand at Supreme Court. Why are they trying so hard to stop one person?? Crazy. Let the people decide.

sacredhealing
Автор

The swamp is deep and its creatures ruthless. The sheep are doing their jobs well.

CoreyJordan-tqhy
Автор

Salem witch trials part two. I’ve never seen the establishment try to get rid of someone this hard

Citizen__X
Автор

Well reasoned?
If you live in a banana republic maybe.

aaronabbott
Автор

Where did you dig this fossil of the watergate era up from?

charles-yzc
Автор

After all, could the CBC come to any other conclusion?

jfuite
Автор

Translation: "We know it's illegal, but we don't like him, so we'll proceed."

txupg
Автор

After the Civil War, former Confederate soldiers were penalized for their active participation in treason and rebellion, leading to their disqualification from holding public office in the South. However, President Johnson's final amnesty proclamation on Christmas Day, 1868, unconditionally pardoned all former Confederates. In contrast, Donald Trump has not been convicted of inciting an insurrection. In this context, Wine-Banks' assessment appears to overlook these historical nuances.

keithjefferson
Автор

Anyone else see right through this like THEY LIVE glasses on?? What a sick world full of propaganda.

canada_rye
Автор

"It's not election rigging when our side does it!" - CBC News

Rewire-vynt
Автор

He was never convicted of insurrection

vegasvato
Автор

Only the CBC could run a piece that justifes this gerrymandering with a Democrat apparatchick and no opposing guest.

gardencity
Автор

Absolute rubbish someone would affirm to this as being a good decision, we live in one hell of a pathetic age these days.

OutlawFMX
Автор

This is a shameful moment for our country.

SleepyJose