Can Nuclear Weapons Prevent War? (feat. It's OK to be Smart!)

preview_player
Показать описание
What are the rules that govern who has nukes and who doesn't? Feat. Joe Hanson of @besmart

North Korea has been making headlines recently, mostly due to its nuclear weapons. In early January, the country's leader, Kim Jong-un, boasted of his ability to reach the U.S. with nuclear-armed missiles. Then in March -- in an apparent 180 -- he told South Korean officials that he would be willing to negotiate with the U.S. to completely denuclearize.

What are the rules that govern who has nukes and who doesn't? And why do some countries maintain huge nuclear arsenals, while many other countries don't have any nukes? Joe Hanson of It's OK to Be Smart joins Myles to investigate.

ABOVE THE NOISE is a show that cuts through the hype and investigates the research behind controversial and trending topics in the news. Hosted by Myles Bess.

*NEW VIDEOS EVERY OTHER WEDNESDAY*

SUBSCRIBE by clicking the RED BUTTON above.
Follow us on Instagram @kqedabovethenoise

When were nuclear weapons first developed?

In 1945, on a summer night in the desert of New Mexico, the USA tested the world's first atomic bomb. It took some of the brightest scientists of the day -- and over 22 billion dollars in today's money -- to make it happen.

How do nuclear weapons work?

Nuclear weapons create massive explosions by altering atoms. These nuclear reactions, as they're called, come in two forms. With fission, 1 atom is split into 2 new atoms. The two bombs the US dropped on Japan in WWII were fission bombs -- they killed more than 200,000 people. Fusion, on the other hand, combines 2 atoms into 1. These hydrogen or thermonuclear bombs have the potential to be a THOUSAND TIMES more powerful than fission bombs.

Are there any rules governing which countries can have nuclear weapons and which can't?

In 1968, the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons was introduced for countries to sign. By doing so, countries with nuclear weapons agreed to take steps to get rid of them. Countries without nukes agreed not to pursue developing or maintaining nukes of their own. Every country has signed the treaty, with a few notable exceptions -- India, Pakistan, and Israel. North Korea did sign, but withdrew in 2003. All four of them went on to develop their own nuclear weapons.

What is nuclear deterrence?

Nuclear deterrence is the theory that what makes nuclear weapons so useful is not using them in war. Instead,, nuclear weapons are intended to deter other states from attacking with their nuclear weapons, through the promise of retaliation.

SOURCES:
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons

The Calculus of Nuclear Deterrence

The Myth of Nuclear Deterrence

Fission VS. Fusion

Timeline of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty

Nuclear Weapon Cheat Sheet

FOR EDUCATORS

About KQED
KQED, an NPR and PBS affiliate in San Francisco, CA, serves Northern California and beyond with a public-supported alternative to commercial TV, Radio, and web media. Funding for Above the Noise is provided in part by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, Silver Giving Foundation, Stuart Foundation, and William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I actually liked all the Pirates of the Caribbean movies

shanhussain
Автор

"When you're born, you get a ticket to the freak show. When you're born in America, you get a front row seat." - George Carlin

liberty-matrix
Автор

This is a vastly underrated channel. As for nuclear weapons, I am for disarmament. It is far more likely that nuclear war will begin with an accident than by any calculated means. We've already come close to disaster several times in our history, only scraping by because someone made a sound judgement call at the moment of crisis. We will inevitably reach a day when Armageddon is on the line and somebody makes the wrong decision. Its only a matter of time.

Imperiused
Автор

Modernizing and rebuilding the existing nukes are not exactly similar to "taking steps to get rid of them".

inzamhaque
Автор

you may get rid of the nukes but you cant get rid of the knowledge on how to develop them
the pandora's box is open it's out there

knrbhwq
Автор

Honestly I think humanity is bound to failure, sooner of later.

MusiCaninesTheMusicalDogs
Автор

We should not invest in nukes and wars, rather we should invest in planting many trees to encounter global warming.

hamidukaundula
Автор

Excelent video, very nice quality. All that money spent in nuclear weapons while thousands of people are starving. War is a sh*t!

juanisalorio
Автор

Fix the map of India. Jammu & Kashmir is no where to be seen here. Same goes with Arunachal Pradesh. Its not even a seperate country how can you kick them out?

shayansachinbasu
Автор

This is just plain offensive to Indians. You totally remove Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh (this isn't even disputed) and Arunachal Pradesh from Indian map but you have no problem giving it to Pakistan and China ? wtf ! Good look getting audience from Pak and China !

codenamevisage
Автор

the country where i live dont "own" nukes but have them from the US on a plot of ground that we officially state is "us" soil so i wonder how many of that kind of countries exist to be honest. maybe that 9 count is way higher if you look at how many countries have Deployable nukes

shintsu
Автор

The Tsar bomba was actually one of the cleanest nukes on record in terms of fallout per kiloton. We have the technology to "dial in" both the initial destruction and the amount of nuclear fallout released by our H-bombs; a capability N Korea likely does not yet have unfortunately.

raleighcockerill
Автор

Who are you to change India’s map. Where is Kashmir

zubairbajwa
Автор

If you want peace prepare for War..



Si vis pacem, para bellum...


Flavius Vegetius

darthsidious
Автор

If the deterence theory is correct tgen EVERY COUNTRY should have nukes

toddmaek
Автор

You're not including the first half of the Cuban missile crisis. Typical americans doesn't know that the US installed nuclear missiles in Turkey that was pointed to Moscow. Fidel Castro also asked for assistance from the Soviets after the US tried to depose him. These were two reasons why the Cuban missile crisis happened.

StraightEdgeSieghart
Автор

When you think about it...nukes are like a double-edged sword.

On one end: they are devastating AF. They can easily kill hundreds of millions via the blasts alone, and if we're counting fallout, even more so.

On the other end: they are also why we (and by that I mean the major nations around the world such as the USA, EU, Russia, etc.) never had a major world war. All the conflicts we've faced off in were mainly proxy wars.

This is so convoluted and confusing to me...yet I keep coming back to it!

aiiv
Автор

Many countries have nukes but only USA had the balls to used it hell we can used it again

HitmanKingJay
Автор

I do understand that it is a disputed territory but you should've shown the area which is controlled by each country. Not blatantly give it to some one else. China doesn't claim entire Jammu and Kashmir. China has Ladhakh, and part of POK was given to China by Pakistan. A large chunk of Kashmir is controlled by Pakistan. A little by India. But the whole Jammu region is not disputed and completely administered by India.

srinivasataruncool
Автор

Thank you so much! I was really wondering for the motives behind nukes, now I get it 😀

someone_weird