These 4 Old Cinema Camera Still Incredible

preview_player
Показать описание
When you revisit some of those catalytic cameras from the past, you’ll find that they can still produce beautiful, cinematic imagery that measures up to today’s standards. Sony F35, Arri Alexa classic, Red One MX, and Sony F3 are the 4 old but gold cinema cameras that still hold up to today's standards. Well, kind of, some of these lack 4K, they can only shoot slow-motion with a cropped sensor, and they aren’t particularly lightweight.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
***Video Sources:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our social media:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: The following video abides by the YouTube Community Guideline. The footage used in this video is for educational purposes and all the information covered in this video was collected from unofficial sources and assumptions.
***Footage, music, images, and graphics used in the video falls under YouTube Fair Usage Policy Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. If you have any copyright issues, please contact us.

#cinemacamera #arri #sony
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Yes, there are many old cameras they up to date.
For a long time all we were looking for was sharpness, sharpness, sharpness. Once we had it, we realized, that the cinematic life was lost. Just cold and without emotion. Therefore my tip. Even something as old as the Sony FS 700 is a great film camera.

ScaramouchedaVinci
Автор

Consumer products have a lifespan of a couple of years, true professional tools remain good for way longer. Proof 4K is largely a marketing ploy and not really as useful as manufacturers try to make us believe

jacopoabbruscato
Автор

Nice video! There are some other classics. What about the Canon C500 Mk1, the F5/55 ans the Varicam 35?

panoramavideoproduktionrob
Автор

Please make more videos on more older cinema cameras

chanderprakash
Автор

Weird commentary, as if 4k is in some way necessary or even a big step on anything but paper. 1080 is plenty IMO, sure I have much higher resolution screens but for watching a movie it really makes no difference IMO except in very rare scenes on extremely sharp shots in some movies. Yes I have tested, with tons of people, also A/B which is 4k, which full HD and not one could ever reliably tell. 2 out of 10 could if they specifically looked for it and had a scene with thin high contrast features, that's it. So 4k is BS for the most part in the sense that it doesn't add much if anything to the experience of watching a movie.

noth
Автор

You forget one which is better than all these 4 cams you mentioned. The Sony f55

wilismatrix
Автор

Hmm… maybe one should know what the international cinema
Projection standard still is?
It’s not 4k, my friends.
It’s called a DCP (digital cinema package) and it’s in… 2k

chrisrossleong
Автор

Jones Sandra Martinez Scott Garcia Betty

MariaAnderson-ei
Автор

What??? Old camera??? AHhahahah!!! The digital cameras is old and die after 3 years! Not good, only garbage! I working whith REAL MOVIE HISTORIC CAMERA: ARRI 35mm BL EVO. Perfect end ETERNAL (The BL used in "The Shinig" and in this moment is perfect works). 35 BL is a REAL Movie Camera! The digital cameras is only camcorder. No Film and not durable.

CinemaSpecialEffects