filmov
tv
Driving While License Suspended Cases Are Extremely Difficult To Win At Trial.
Показать описание
28.11 DRIVING [WHILE [LICENSE] [DRIVING PRIVILEGE] SUSPENDED, REVOKED OR CANCELED] [OR] [UNDER SUSPENSION OR REVOCATION EQUIVALENT STATUS] WITH KNOWLEDGE
§ 322.34(2), Fla. Stat.
To prove the crime of Driving [While [License] [Driving Privilege] was [Suspended] [Revoked] [Canceled]] [Under Suspension or Revocation Equivalent Status], the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. (Defendant) drove a motor vehicle upon a highway in this state.
Give as applicable.
2. At that time,
a. [his] [her] [license] [driving privilege] was [suspended] [revoked] [canceled].
b. [he] [she] was under suspension or revocation equivalent status.
Give as applicable.
3. At that time, (defendant) knew that
a. [his] [her] [license] [driving privilege] was [suspended] [revoked] [canceled].
b. [he] [she] was under suspension or revocation equivalent status.
Whether (defendant) knew of the [suspension] [revocation] [cancellation] [suspension or revocation equivalent status] is a question to be determined by you from the evidence.
Give as applicable. See § 322.251(1), (2), and § 322.34(2),(3),(4), Fla. Stat.
Proof that there exists an entry in the records of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles showing that notice of the [suspension] [revocation] [cancellation] was given by personal delivery is proof that such notice was given.
Proof that there exists an entry in the records of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles showing that notice of the [suspension] [revocation] [cancellation] was deposited in United States mail, first class, postage prepaid, addressed to the licensee at [his] [her] last known mailing address furnished to the department, is proof that such notice was sent.
If you find that (defendant) had been previously cited for driving [while license [suspended] [revoked] [canceled] and [his] [her] license had not been reinstated, you may conclude that (defendant) knew of the [suspension] [revocation] [cancellation].
If you find that (defendant) admitted to knowing of the [suspension] [revocation] [cancellation] [suspension or revocation equivalent status], you may conclude that (defendant) knew of the [suspension] [revocation] [cancellation] [suspension or revocation equivalent status].
If you find that (defendant) had received a traffic citation that contained a provision notifying (defendant) that [his] [her] license [had been suspended, revoked, or canceled] [was under suspension or revocation equivalent status], you may conclude that (defendant) knew of the [suspension] [revocation] [cancellation] [suspension or revocation equivalent status].
Do not give if the suspension was for failure to pay a traffic fine or for a financial responsibility violation. See § 322.34(2) and § 322.251(1), (2), Fla. Stat.
If you find that (defendant) had received a [judgment] [order] rendered by [a court] [an adjudicatory body] which contained a provision notifying (defendant) that [his] [her] license had been [suspended] [revoked] [canceled], you may conclude that (defendant) knew of the [suspension] [revocation] [cancellation].
If you find that the records of the Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles include a [judgment] [order] rendered by [a court] [an adjudicatory body] that contains a provision notifying (defendant) that [his] [her] license [had been [suspended] [revoked] [canceled]] [was under suspension or revocation equivalent status], you may conclude that (defendant) knew [his] [her] license was [suspended] [revoked] [canceled] [under suspension or revocation equivalent status]. You may accept or reject the inference depending upon the circumstances of the crime and the facts presented at trial.
Комментарии