The SAR Scan Under Khafre's Pyramid Examined: Hoax or Real?

The internet has been abuzz with the scan data from the Khafre Project and the SAR readings they published. In their public statements, they claim to have discovered gigantic underground infrastructure surrounding the middle pyramid on the Giza Plateau. How accurate is their scan data? How does this tie in to the rest of what we know? Is this a hoax, or are we on the verge of a new chapter in Egyptology?

My second channel:

Link to the video premiering on the new channel:

Become a channel member:

Patreon:

Ko-Fi:

Instagram:

Twitter:

Discord:

Fight for the Past with Graham Hancock:

I'm speaking at the Cosmic Summit next year, get your tickets here:

2022 pyramid scan paper:

HarmonicSAR page (includes their claims of finding features other than Pyramids in’s under the earth using SAR):

NASA:

Khafre Research Project FaceBook page:

Publicity report: Scan Information from the team:

Doppler Tomography Explained:

SAR graphics:

Doppler Graphics:

2012 report on advancement of SAR:

Video explaining SAR:

[ThatGoodBarbequ]

Dan consistently has the most reasonable takes

[theonetruemorty]

You were great on Pierce Morgan. Most unbiased, rational POV out of the panel. The look on Flint's face when you shouted out Graham's book... priceless.

[alohm]

I have ignored all coverage. Glad you are covering it. Thanks.

[osirisgolad]

Mark Twain is a good reference as per usual: "There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact."

[jimbailey]

First time viewer here.
Wow. So much information delivered in a reasoned, thoughtful, understandable way.
Thank you!!

[Haiick]

A single analysis to demonstrate to all YouTube what it means to have ability, competence, intelligence, scientific method, intellectual honesty, adequate logical abstraction and I could go on. Today there are less than 200 people in the world who can speak at a competent and professional level about this technology and research, and none of them have yet made any criticisms. Wait patiently, because reflection is necessary in any approach that has a scientific basis. Thank you for trying to put some balance and order in this chaos.

BRAVISSIMO.

[Slayerjohn]

In my 51 years, I have learned to keep an open mind until u get as much info as possible

[freshofbreathair]

I’d like to see examples of known buried things like subway networks to see if it’s at all accurate.

[ndTim_-]

The fact that they already tested it on something that is known 1.5 km down speaks volumes to me, not sure why people are ignoring that

[dougmorrow]

Great comments, and excellent evidence that "pseudoscientists" have a much more reasonable and subtle take on the whole phenomena than the critics. And the Piers show seemed more like he was trying to start a fight, rather than get good, honest opinions. You and Jimmy did a great job.

[jackanstey]

youve become one if my yt go toos now!! when i first saw you on jre, i jist respected how you articulated yourself. love the work and keep it up!

[iainhittel]

when people refuse to dig..I immediately start to question

[sirjohnahayfalcon]

second time ive listened to dedunking, love the work he puts forth and speaks so you can understand

[ALEX-RAMPAGE]

Thank you from Italy. I have personally met Prof. Malanga and although it can be said that he has a broad vision on certain topics, I can say with absolute certainty that his scientific rigor is his preparation as well as that of the team that accompanies him in the kephren project is among the most serious and rigorous in the scientific field. In the hope that this news will push the academic world to investigate all this thoroughly.

[Atho]

Everyone keeps making the same mistake. They are not large collum's, they are wells/holes that have been cut in solid rock. It seems no one actually reads the paper, which clearly says they are hollow tubes that have been cut in solid bedrock. Once again, they are not huge stone collum's, they are hollow wells. The images someone made up are ass about, and tricking people into thinking that the pyramid is being held up by these huge collum's of rock with what looks like springs wound around them. Those collum's are the hollow section surrounded by solid rock.

[Nobnoxious]

The “jumping the gun to get funding” angle seems to be pretty spot on to me.

[Joshy]

Found this channel thru Rogan. Finally dedunking talking on this topic!!!
Honesty is key. & this channel is honest. 🤙🤙

[braxtonvestal]

Man, I wish I could share a cold one and spark up with Dan. Your ability to keep an open mind while maintaining a healthy yet cautious level of skepticism is insanely rare these days. Thats real intelligence and wisdom.

[awaterplease]

Finally an explanation that makes sense to me! It’s a marketing stunt for that software.
As a software engineer, I just wanted to see the software that translates the raw data into those images, and it didn’t make sense to me that they didn’t open source the software to prove their claims. But I thought that those Italian scientists are archeologists that just build a piece of software as a tool for their work.
But if the software itself is what they want to sell then this whole thing makes sense

[andrewporrelli]

This all reminds me of this historic quote - "I have seen the great pyramid of Egypt. I have seen beneath it things so strange that, were I to describe them, you would think me mad. But I know that I have seen them." Al Masudi. 947.