BREAKING: ATF MOVING TO BAN AR-15s...

preview_player
Показать описание
The Biden Harris DOJ position articulated in the Vanderstok "ghost gun" case is very scary and could set a dangerous precedent for banning AR-15s if the Supreme Court upholds it. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner explains.

-----------------

Follow Along On Social Media

-----------------

The Four Boxes Diner serves up hot, fresh Second Amendment news and analysis. You’ll get the inside scoop from constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, a member of the United States Supreme Court Bar, a professor, a frequent Fox News guest, and a New York Times bestselling author. Mark's books include The Official Handbook of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, First They Came for the Gun Owners, and Duped: How the Anti-gun Lobby Exploits the Parkland School Shooting, and How Gun Owners Can Fight Back. Mark’s scholarship has been used by lawyers before the U.S. and his work has been quoted by a federal judge (Roger Benitez) in declaring California’s so-called “assault weapon” ban to be unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.

To defend your liberty, you need to understand the “four boxes” of American liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box. We give you the information you need, and we hope to serve as your source for Bill of Rights news and analysis.

-----------------
SUMMARY
-----------------
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

MARK SMITH WILL BE SPEAKING AUGUST 17-18 AT THE GUN OWNERS OF AMERICAN CONFERENCE IN KNOXVILLE, TN. IF YOU ARE IN THE AREA, CHECK IT OUT.

TheFourBoxesDiner
Автор

SCOTUS has already ruled that any weapon in common use is protected under the 2nd Amendment and MAY NOT BE BANNED!

jackiemowery
Автор

By ATF's reasoning, every driver should get a speeding ticket because the motor vehicle has the POTENTIAL to go over the speed limit..

ggrindley
Автор

If you cannot see the irony of having a gun ban enforced by men with guns, then you fail to understand why the second amendment was written in the first place

allengose
Автор

I'm just tickled they'd try this. If an AR-15 is a MG, then MGs are now commonly owned.

jorrkenn
Автор

Never mistake their treason for ignorance or incompetence.

roofkorean
Автор

So who else does not give a damn what the ATF has to say?

ramonlong
Автор

Lot of people are getting real tired of this crap.

roquri
Автор

When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty” - Thomas Jefferson

JasonWoods-edyu
Автор

At this point the Supreme Court needs to file contempt charges against the ATF director and arrest him.

crosisofborg
Автор

This will never happen. We The People will not give up our guns

calpulse
Автор

The ATF has no authority to ban anything.

thunderlightning
Автор

I think We the People need a class action lawsuit against the ATF for violating our Constitutional Rights.

BBoyBFit
Автор

Let's abolish the ATF & NFA and the question & problem are GONE !!!

ctm
Автор

Since bruen, since the 1934 NFA and the Gun Control Act of 1968 did not exist in 1776, does it not therefore make them unconstitutional and illegal????

robcrna
Автор

With CHEVRON being overturned, they shouldn’t have the authority to interpret that any longer, correct?

ryansmith
Автор

"Potential" is not a point of fact... it is a future crimes mentality... so wrong on so many levels

robviousobviously
Автор

How many time does the SC have to say it. No BAN ON AR 15.

StephenWarzecha
Автор

The ATF’s absurd definition is analogous to arguing that any man is a rapist because he has the potential to become a rapist.

davidrobertson
Автор

The NFA would fail a test of 2 step interest balancing. And it needs to face that challenge.
Last I checked, the 'Shall not be infringed' clause has never been Constitutionally modified to include any "except for' list of conditions.

VibeGuy