Budget Magic: 42 Land Swan Hunt vs Affinity (Match 4)

Are we fast enough to keep up with a deck that can spew its entire hand on the battlefield as early as turn one?

[sebita]

"This hand is looking pretty close to our nuts" I might be 5 years old but that was hilarious

[ChiisaiRamen]

Am i the only one annoyed that he wouldnt seismic assault the leftmost lands so he wouldn have to count and scroll a thousand times?

[TandaTen]

"This hand is looking pretty close to our nuts" Thanks Seth made me laugh.

[albertobarbieri]

never submitted a channel but this deck got me in. great job....subscribed, lol

[freakhead]

You could actually have just cast Smash to Smithereens during that last game for the last 3 damage.

[David-xgks]

I'm laughing my way through this entire match series

[angrybadger]

Can you make like a non budget optimal version of this. I just want to see what it would look like.

[Kakerate]

If you wanted to up it from budget, a few more expensive lands could help. Imo swap out Molten Vortex for 2 shocks or something to draw crazy cards.

[madmayhem]

I love how Saff says "moun-in"

[Ripoff]

game two he should've played the shivan reef and taken a damage since he could afford to discard the mountain to kill a creature. He needed the blue source.

[Drakksy]

"this hand is looking pretty close to our nuts"
almost as bad as mydixiewreckedlookatme

[coolnobodycares]

I feel as often as people scoop early you can win most games with only about half the lands you actually need to kill your opponent.

[lalalalala]

Holy shit this deck is strong against creature based aggros.

[chrisbruzon]

I can just imagine Seth doing all kinds of crazy math in his head while trying to figure out how to kill his opponent in the last round

[mariofisher]

treasure hunt is in the most tilting of decks