Photogrammetry vs Neural Radiance Fields vs 3D Gaussian Splatting

preview_player
Показать описание
Comparison of reality capture techniques using Photogrammetry , Neural Radiance Fields and 3D Gaussian Splatting.

Dataset 118 photos from the cellphone

00:00 - Intro
00:11 - Photogrammetry
00:46 - Luma.AI NeRF RAW
01:12 - Luma.AI NeRF Render
01:38 - Luma.AI 3DGS
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I have few question in mind
1. Is all three use geometry ?
2. How they mimic reflection and other material properties other than base color ?

rajendrameena
Автор

Ждём появления нейронок, дорисовывающих недостающие ракурсы

aleks-ivanov
Автор

Hi, how are you approaching the cleaning of splats? gaussian splatting loos very good in some parts and awful in others, can you create a workable mesh from .ply files?

leono
Автор

Why does the photogrammetry look so bad? The untextured mesh looks like it's either been decimated to oblivion or captured and processed using a mobile phone 😂

Pablomache
Автор

Res is too low. PG must be the best of.

msbull