NASA Just Solved the Super Sonic Flight Problem

🚀 NASA Is Bringing Supersonic Planes BACK! 🚀

Remember the Concorde and the golden age of aviation when we could fly faster than the speed of sound? 🌟✈️ Fast forward to today, and there isn’t a single supersonic passenger plane in service. So, what makes supersonic travel so tricky, and can modern technology change that? Are we on the brink of a new golden age of aviation? 🛫✨

Join me as we explore the challenges and exciting possibilities of supersonic travel! Let’s figure this out together and see if NASA can make our high-speed dreams come true! 🚀🔍🌍

》》》SUPPORT THE SHOW!《《《

》》》OUR PARTNERS《《《

》》》GOING SOLAR?《《《

》》》COMPANY OUTREACH 《《《

》》》CONNECT WITH US 《《《

Chapters
00:00 - Introduction
02:11 - The Concorde
03:36 - Safety issues
06:25 - Concorde's Problems
08:51 - Sonic boom
09:18 - New Blood
11:31 - NASA's X-59
13:36 - Future is Bright

@laifen_tech #laifen #laifenwave

what we'll cover
two bit da vinci,Why America's NEW Supersonic Race Will Be DIFFERENT,supersonic,supersonic race,supersonic travel,concorde,supersonic flight,nasa x59,nasa x-59 supersonic jet,new supersonic race,boom overture,why is supersonic,why supersonic flight failed,sonic boom,why is supersonic flight so hard,why dont we have supersonic,why the concorde failed,what happened to the concorde,future of supersonic commercial flight,future of supersonic flight, NEW Supersonic Race Will Change Aviation Forever!, NASA Just Solved the Supersonic Flight Problem!, Supersonic Air Travel is Making a MAJOR Comeback!, Researchers JUST Solved the Super Sonic Flight Problem!, NASA Just Solved the Super Sonic Flight Problem

[kandismueller]

I worked on the Concorde as a Braniff flight attendant because Braniff had a promotional interchange with Air France and British Airways in the late 70s. Braniff only flew it sub-sonic and we only flew it between Dallas and Washington DC. The week that I worked on it the flights were always brim-full. I sat in the aft jump seat (facing aft) and take-offs were especially thrilling. It felt and sounded like a rocket ship with my body thrown against the seat harness! Because we remained sub-sonic over the US, even at our cruising altitude the plane never leveled off. Pushing those carts uphill from the aft galley was a bit of a chore. No, really, I was very lucky to experience the Concorde!

[PapaWheelie]

I would be more impressed if they could double the speed of the TSA lines

[Istandby]

The effects of sonic booms on the public was first tested in Tulsa, Oklahoma.
After blowing out windows and tearing roofs off houses. The AIr Force moved just North of Oklahoma City for further testing.
Now the Mojave desert is the only legal place to break the sound barrier in the states.

[dustinandrews]

As someone with a toddler and family 4, 000 miles away cutting the travel time down from 4 hours to two is a big deal. Though as someone with a toddler I might not be able to afford it...

[potatoradio]

1961 a Douglass DC8 became the first supersonic airliner.

[codebycarlos]

Not sure if it's just me but audio sounds muffled?

[josephbryant]

Slight correction, Aerion is no longer building their supersonic business jet, the company has been defunct as of 2021

[tonycosta]

I recall the TU144 was incredibly loud inside, so much so that you could barely have a conversation. And the air show crash was actually a result of a French surveillance airplane flying above (it was he reason the TU144 take off was delayed as the French had to wait for the surveillance airplane to get in position). When they climbed, their radar sounded a collision warning causing them to level off abruptly, stressing the plane beyond its design. The French and Soviets settled the case quietly as it was an embarrassment for both.

[sunkeyavad]

And this video just solved acoustic time travel. It's audio is from 30 years ago.

[dannygoldsmithmagic]

The muffled audio makes this very difficult to watch

[sarkhori]

As long as the flight is long enough to justify it, the fuel burn rate wouldn't necessarily be hugely different if the plane were higher up - most of the fuel burn on the Concorde was keeping that speed up against the friction of the atmosphere - fly higher, less friction. Only works for long flights, though....

[jamescobban]

For a lower ticket price, less sonic boom risk, and far less GHG emission into the Stratosphere, Starship, a transport solution that is already under construction, can deliver passengers anywhere within 10, 000km in 50 minutes.

[LordDustinDeWynd]

Don't forget the USA's Boeing SST, killed in 1971 because of skyrocketing fuel prices and environmental concerns

[blue_beephang-glider]

Solar Airship One excites me much more.
Any fast plane puts you in an aluminum tube with sardine can seating.
Airships you could walk around in, have panoramic views, proper dining and bedrooms.
comfort with an ever-changing view, for me thanks.

[paulgracey]

I spent most of my high school years of 1967-60 in San Diego, when military jets at Miramar and North Island regularly broke the sound barrier over populated and non-populated areas. It was the height of the Cold War after all. Learning to drive with the occasional sonic boom rattling my nerves was a hazard on top of the no seatbelts cars we had then.
But I want to tell you about the 1967 trip I took to the Expo 67 Worlds Fair in Montreal Canada. A model of the Concorde was of course prominently displayed at the French and British pavilions, but it was there that the Russians made known that they would be building one too. I saw their Model TU-144 and did not expect that it was a real project. After all I had seen their display of color TVs that were built around an export version of the RCA shadow mask picture tube that also had been the basis of the Hitachi color TV I saw in a bar in the Tokyo Ginza in 1963 when there with the U.S. Navy ship I served aboard.
The U.S. pavillion had a model SST too, as I recall, that could have solved the profitability issue, should it have been built. Swing wing, for much better landing and take-off performance, and 300 passenger capable, at least on paper. It represented our American pride of aerospace primacy.
But for our government to build and test such a beast back then was going to impact that other program we had been spending roughly 4% of our GDP upon, the Apollo manned missions to the Moon. We did not want to fail at that one.
So maybe that prohibition against supersonic overflights had been a product of of a governmental ruling with ulterior motives. It was well known that the airlines flying the Concorde hoped to add several inland cities on both sides of the Atlantic to their flight plans for it, which would have meant around a hundred of them being built. Had those factors have been possible, we might still be seeing them in the skies today.

[Istandby]

Growing up around Edwards Air Force Base and the Mach tunnel. I grew up listening to and feeling sonic booms, in fact it's one of the biggest things I miss about the desert.

[danielrichards]

Audio is definitely messed up…usually not an issue on his videos. I assume there was just an issue and not enough time to fix it this time.

[garyleo]

3:12 that crash happened in 1973 not 63

[donaldduck]

Employing Inertia drives and not relying on aerodynamics means we can leave earths atmosphere and accelerate to any velocity before reentering at our destination.

[GROGU]

Everytime I think of the Concorde, I think of "The Parent Trap" with Lindsey Lohan. They used the Concorde to get to London faster than the regular airline and profess his love for their mom.