Debate Teacher Reacts: William Lane Craig vs. Mohammed Hijab

Christian philosopher and apologist William Lane Craig debated Muslim apologist Mohammed Hijab over the issue of whether the Trinity is logically coherent. Who bested the other in debate? How DO you pronounce Cerberus?? We're about to find out!

[MultiSky]

I've watched it. Oh, my goodness. The level of twisting of the facts and WLC's statements, 'subtle' perfidious mockery and ad hominem attacks towards dr. WLC, from Hijab was just disgusting.

[Snow-Willow]

Hijab is The perfect example of highlighting how you can have all the degrees in the world and it doesn't mean you're smart.

[swolenj]

Nate c’mon Man U gotta do more of these brother!! I miss debate teacher reacts 🙏

[henrylopez]

Hijab is the WORST person. He has said some disgusting things before about Christianity as a whole. He has pushed blatant lies and has refused to answer for them. This debate isnt even close to what this guy has said and done when only infront of Muslims

[RuslanKD]

Great analysis. It’s always rough watching Hijab.

[rpoetic]

Hijab never debates the resolution. He seems to know he cant win them. His typical tactic is to debate on a similar issue reframed that he thinks he can win. Ive seen him do it multiple times online

[jayluss]

To Hijab’s credit, it would be difficult for anyone to debate against something that’s true.

[Nutterbutter]

The debate topic is to investigate the Trinity

Hijab the whole time- “you don’t worship the church fathers”

[matthewtucker]

I can see the pain in Dr. Craigs eyes lol he had to pep talk himself just to get through all of Hijabs nonsense. Dr. Craig is such a gentleman and I commend him. Thanks for the video Nate. God bless you brothers and sisters in Christ. God be praised.

[JabberWkie]

Hijab knew exactly what he was doing. For many Muslim debaters, fallacies such as ad hominems and straw men are not just tolerated, but encouraged. Winning the debate via diversion and deception is valued more than uncovering truth. Hijab’s goal was to make WLC look foolish and untrustworthy, not necessarily to bring illumination to the debate topic. In doing that, Hijab believes he can influence his followers to discredit anything WLC says, even if it’s perfectly reasonable.

I’ll also say that while I appreciate Cameron’s attempts to remain neutral, I think he might have overcompensated a little bit in favor of Hijab to keep from looking biased.

[guesswhopeekaboo]

You missed the most hilarious part where Hijab says the 2 matches make a bigger flame

[sugami]

Hijab: TWO FLAME MAKE BIG FLAME!
Let it be known that this man is studying for a PhD in Philosophy 😂😂😂

[dwchaosfan]

Nooo! The best part was coming right up! "THEY MAKE A BIGGER FLAME!"

[kelsey]

Props to William Lane Craig for being so respectful and level-headed while his opponent avoided the actual debate and instead went to insults. It's hard facing someone who refuses to take your position seriously and mocks you—I could not have been so calm and kind, and that's definitely an area I aim to improve in.

[halleylujah]

Great review. Thanks for covering this debate. I agree with your assessment of the debate.

[kakhakheviashvili]

It's not "almost if", it's "he 100% chooses to be wilfully ignorant". Since the ease of understanding of Tauheed (which isn't even true, they waged massive war over disputes regarding Tauheed) is one of their main arguments.

[SandShark]

I would be comfortable in just stating that every argument from hijab is an argument from ignorance

[googlespynetwork]

Yes, some would say "way too This is my favorite channel content. Love the debate reactions.

[unamusedmule]

I was convinced when he said "You If you take 2 flame it become bigger flame the trinity is debunked!!! You're finished boi!!" 😂😂😂😂

[liveluke.]

He has very childish arguments. It is a consistent thing with Muslim “Scholars.”