Did You Know In PETER PAN 2: RETURN TO NEVERLAND…

You’ll notice that there have been some modifications made to the design of a specific Neverland species in the movie. Take note of the look the mermaids have in this sequel. They are now all seen to be wearing brassieres when on screen for their short appearance. This is likely due to how the appearance of some of the mermaids in the first Peter Pan movie was heavily criticized and considered to be too sexualised for a young target audience, with some only having their hair or long necklaces covering their upper private parts.

Movie: Peter Pan 2: Return to Never Land

#Shorts #MovieFacts #DidYouKnow

[MouseTheGoblin]

I’m gunna be honest, as a kid I never even noticed that

I was too focused on the fact there were cool slightly murderous mermaids on screen to notice

[mahilagoncam]

I think just having the hair cover them or a necklace makes them look even more magical

[arirveo]

What young child would be thinking "Mermaid obscenity! Throw it out mother!" A child wouldn't even notice 😂

[MillyylliM]

I feel like the old movie covered more than the new one

[pileofsaltOG]

angry moms :"this generation is so sensitive"
also moms:

[sovietpowersupereme]

"upper private parts" at this point call them lumps of flesh

I'm editing this comment because I have literally gotten 4 notifications every day that someone has commented on here to say this.

[michaelburns]

That's not even the worst bit ....THEY CHANGED THERE TAIL COLOURS!! the original ones had SKY BLUE but now they have a SEAFOAM GREEN similar to Ariel

[DarthEyesDragon]

“We were only trying to drown her”

That line stuck out to me more than anything…

[fourke]

Dude if mermaids existed I am pretty sure they wouldn't even be wearing bras. Even if they did, they wouldn't be mutilating clams over it lmfao

[guramania]

People freak out way too much over women’s chest

[sistersamich]

The young audience was literally at most 7 years off of using those “upper private parts” as a source of warmth, food, and connection to their maternal figures

[weebedout]

As a child who LOVED Peter Pan; I can say that I literally NEVER noticed and I watched it daily. People complain about these things but kids literally don't notice.

[annabellem]

"Upper private parts"🤣🤣I'm dying

[Pradapussy]

The old movie was more modest cause they added less shape to the chest

[Tecpatl]

Old fairytale Illustrations would usually have mermaids covered up like that or even have their chests out. It wasn't perverted it was whimsical, like of course they don't have clothes in the sea, they're basically fish!

[epicbopthealien]

I actually like the original mermaids in the original Peter Pan, it seems more realistic and feels how mermaids would actually be

[adrianghandtchi]

“They're called boobs, Ed” - E.Brockovich

[lunaamore]

It never bothered me when I was a kid watching the mermaids in the 1st Peter Pan.
Because their mermaids and it made sense to me as a young child Why mermaids didn't wear clothes.

There was nothing wrong with the design they were quite decent.


It's not like they showed Peter Pan playing with their Boobs.

[Princess-shitter-sprinkles]

Bro, they're the ones making it Inappropriate. 💀

[royalbee]

when I was a child I never thought of the mermaids in such way, children are not the dirty minded ones, the adults are!! if you believe something to be inappropriate that is YOU, the child won't see what you see.