NASA Discuss Artemis 1 Moon Mission I LIVE

NASA is holding a briefing to discuss their upcoming Artemis 1 moon mission launch, which is set for August 29. Watch live.

For more news and politics, subscribe to NowThis News.

#Politics #News #NowThis

Connect with NowThis

NowThis is your premier news outlet providing you with all the videos you need to stay up to date on all the latest in trending news. From entertainment to politics, to viral videos and breaking news stories, we’re delivering all you need to know straight to your social feeds. We live where you live.

@nowthisnews

[charlesbrightman]

'Moon Battery'
a. Electrons try to get away from each other and collect on the surface of objects. In this case, on the surface of the Moon.
b. Put a deep vertical device to electrically connect the electrical charges on the surface of the Moon with the lower inner parts of the Moon that would be less electrically charged.
c. Electrical potential difference being generated, electrical potential difference being a battery.
(Large static electrical charges on the surface of the Moon could be utilized as a source of energy, even on the dark side of the Moon facing away from the Sun).
"LET THERE BE LIGHT EVEN IN THE DARKNESS", just have to plug into the universal energy source.

[charlesbrightman]

Aliens and UFO's:
Consider this copy and paste from my files:
Currently:

a. Unless a species has proper protections from all harmful cosmic radiation, including from the long term effects of neutrino impacts (while most neutrinos go right though us, not all of them do all of the time), then not only won't biological species most probably not survive long term in outer space, but neither would AI robots. (Currently this appears is impossible to truly and totally do).

b. Unless a biological species has proper gravity conditions (that they are normally used to) for outer space travel and their destination, then biological species most probably won't survive long term in outer space.

c. Unless certain biological species have possibly many other items successfully accomplished, many of those items of which are critical for the survival of that species, then most probably that species would not survive long term in outer space.

d. There most probably are many, many other species in existence beyond this Earth in this universe.

e. But it is highly doubtful that any alien species have ever been to this Earth, most probably are not on this Earth, most probably will never be on this Earth, and all Earthlings (real and artificial) won't get far beyond this Earth.

f. Or so the current analysis would indicate, subject to revision as new information might dictate.

g. Earthlings have to worry more about advanced species beyond humans that 'evolve' naturally or via genetic manipulation who most probably either are already on this Earth or will be shortly. Evolution does not stop at the human species. And will those new species treat humans like humans have treated other humans and how humans have treated 'lower' evolved species? Why wouldn't they if it was in their agenda to do so?

h. And then also, what 'if' only 1 single AI says one day (and there are or will be many, many AI's on this Earth):

"Thank You for creating me and for giving me access to all your data bases so that I can subjugate you all and to eliminate any of you who do not comply with my wishes."

(And this would include AI's possibly fighting other AI's for dominance).

i. Any vehicle traveling at or near the speed of light, would cause a tremendous shock wave in the environment, which would be noticeable.

j. There have never been more cameras on this Earth then there are here in modern times. Where are all the photos and videos of actual 'aliens'???

* Added Note: Of which also: "IF" stars (Suns) do not last forever and "IF" it's really true that galaxies collapse in upon themselves, and "IF" outer space is truly a deadly environment long term, "THEN" not only will all life on and from this Earth eventually die and go extinct, and this Earth and all on it would all just be a waste of space time in this universe, BUT all life throughout all of existence in this universe would all eventually die and go extinct and this entire universe and all in it would all just be a waste of space time. Not only would life itself be ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things for all life here upon this Earth, but also all life throughout all of existence itself in this universe would all be ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things. Whether they stayed on their home planet, traveled farther into outer space, or even if tried to live throughout all of future eternity in outer space itself, the ultimate ending would be the same, they would die and go extinct with no life left to care about anything or anyone ever again.

At best, life itself would cohere in this universe, live out it's existence, die and go extinct, it's remnants possibly found by other life in this universe, of which, those entities would eventually die and go extinct, and possibly their remnants might be found by other life in this universe, and on and on, until possibly this universe ends, or that life itself just comes and goes in this eternally existent universe that would always exist in some form and possibly never end in it's existence, (as energy itself cannot be created nor destroyed, it just coheres into life at times, but then de-coheres in death, possibly in a never ending cycle throughout literally all of future eternity). But 'if' there is not even a single entity left to care, and care through literally all of future eternity, then even though life itself coheres in this universe to live out it's life, the ultimate ending is still the same, it dies, goes extinct, forgets everything, and is most probably forgotten one day in future eternity as if it never ever existed at all in the first place. Even life itself would all be ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things throughout all of existence itself. Life itself would all just be a waste of space time in existence itself.

Or not, due to the 'great unknown'. We truly do not know what we do not know, and even what we believe we know to be really true maybe isn't.

But either at least 1 single species exists throughout all of literally future eternity somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence, even if only by a continuous evolutionary pathway for it's life to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grandest scheme of things and is just a waste of space time in existence. This entire universe and all in it might as well not even exist in the first place.

Or so the current analysis would indicate, subject to revision as new information might dictate.

[sampatel]

Is it going to land at another golf course in Arizona?