The TRUTH About the Richat Structure #historicaltidbits

preview_player
Показать описание
#shorts #history #myths
The Richat Structure in Mauritania, Africa. Also known as the Eye of the Sahara. It's 28 miles long and often claimed (falsely) that it's the remnants of the lost city of Atlantis by pseudoscientific YouTube channels. This is actually former dome caused by volcanic forces that eroded away from wind and water after millions of years when the Sahara Desert was still green.

Please like, comment, and subscribe. Check out my Patreon to help support the channel. Only $2/month.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

I find the Atlantis claim a lot more realistic than yours due to the substantial historical ties to this area being linked to King Atlas of Atlantis....

truthblitz
Автор

As a geologist. Thats nonsense. I wholeheartedly believe it really is Atlantis. No natural phenomenon will create such a structure

Potatopops
Автор

Never mind the Atlas mountains to the north. Atlas was the first ruler of Atlantis.

poolplayergus
Автор

Troy was found by people with the fortitude to follow their instincts and ignore people who wanted to be considered experts

nunzioification
Автор

My first question would be was there lakes and rivers near the structure that could sustain a population

Timshot
Автор

Any peer reviewed literary source on the magamatic upwelling at this location?

shauncaruna
Автор

And why do not investigate each posibilities?

medcognome
Автор

Nah, I'll indulge in the fantastical.

haytonism
Автор

That is how the ancient aliens used to construct cities...they used to construct magma domes using their alien tech then remove the top part of such dome...😂/s
Thanks for the explanation though...

namansinghnegi
Автор

A mountain wore away from the wind! Poppycock! Utter twaddle! Show me another example of a domed mountian being worn away flat from the weather? I think it's more likely the spot of a giant whirlpool when the oceans rolled over the land during a pole shift. But I'm just a mushroom.

haroldcicero
Автор

I mean Atlantis would have existed like 30, 000-10, 000 years ago or something like that, so why can’t it have both been Atlantis and a geological phenomenon? Just a thought

gavincabral
Автор

Lets just marvel..huh? They could've buit Atlantis on this 'upwelling".

DominicoGuitars
Автор

Unfortunately, it is the blind arrogance of people like you, and academics, who are constantly proven wrong, that narrow the exploration of truth in this world..

billyjojimbob
Автор

Where are the artifacts and megalithic structures?

jaybrooks
Автор

It doesn't really disprove that it's not Atlantis. This just suggests that the rings are naturally formed, which Atlantis could've then been built on top of lol

MatchesMalone
welcome to shbcf.ru