The Bible is Corrupted? Prove it!

Show me some evidence.

1. Define “corruption”
2. When was the Gospel corrupted?
3. How was the Gospel corrupted?
4. Who corrupted the Gospel?
5. Evidence?

I realize YouTube is discontinuing private messages for many users. I'll still be available via "Business Inquiry Emails" for those who want to send their responses privately. This can be accessed through the desktop version only, not mobile. This will take effect on July 9th, 2018.

[thinkingdeep]

I call this the blind argument 😶
God bless you brother 😇

[robertkirby]

When I think "corruption", I think of the textual variations that can be found in ancient texts. The Bible and to a lesser extent the Quran (though I'm more aware of the ones found in the Bible, I don't know much of the textual criticism of the Quran) has these, and there's nothing wrong to admit that, I personally think you can believe that some god gave mankind divinely inspired writings but through human error was slightly changed through the painstaking process of copying them letter by letter.

[Kizzy-ti]

I appreciate your levelled talking and challenges toward Muslims. I am curious if you keep this intelligent style, as I cannot stand heated arguments when one does not respect the other person. Looking forward to watching and hearing more of your work.

[بيترالتونسي]

Can you translate your videos in Arabic im ex muslim arabic now im Christian ✝️ but i don’t understand English

[Gorillarevolta]

What's interesting is the subtle difference between the account of Joseph in Genesis and Surah 12. In Surah 12, Joseph meets his *parents* at the end of the story. Whereas in Genesis, Joseph's mother Rachel dies before his ordeal. Clearly the Bible has the original (more accurate, more detailed) account.
If the differences where caused by "corruption", can anyone explain why people would say Rachel died when she didn't?

[walkingtall]

It's August 11, 2019, Am I safe to assume that Muslims came up empty handed as usual?

[Narukami]

May I ask question...
-If the Bible is corrupted, then why they use the Bible as a supporting details or prof as they (the quran) are fact, they exist, and this is true from the word of God???
-No offense to my curious-

[danakarloz]

No proof whatsoever 😒 I had some idiot telling me the exact same thing which was absolutely nothing...he said that God left the Bible in such a state...what state was he talking about? He made no sense and when I asked him to clarify his statement, he said that I was eluding his question...what question?! 🤣🤓

[salah]

the first proof we don"t know who wrote the Bible

[SecretGarden]

A nicely outlined, and much-needed, challenge, Islam Critiqued. Let's pray that it goads Muslims to overcome their spiritual lethargy, and really search for evidence of this claim.

God bless you!

[lindaclark]

This is going to be good. But the only reference Muslims can give is Islamic texts. Which means nothing.

[Ibn_al_sham]

2 big corruptions in the Bible the most corrupted book I’ve ever seen 👇

1. Samuel 24:9 Then Joab gave the sum of the number of
the people to the king. And there were in
Israel eight hundred thousand valiant
men who drew the sword, and the men of
Judah were five hundred thousand men.

2.Chronicles 21:5 - Then Joab gave the sum of the number
of the people to David. All Israel had
one million one hundred thousand
men who drew the sword, and Judah
had four hundred and seventy
thousand men who drew the sword.

So which number is the right one ?? Big corruption in the Bible

Second corruption

2 Samuel 6:23
Therefore Michal the daughter
of Saul had no children to the
day of her death.

2 Samuel 21:8
So the king took Armoni and Mephibosheth, the
two sons of Rizpah the daughter of Aiah, whom
she bore to Saul, and the five sons of Michal the
daughter of Saul

So which one is the right one ?? Big corruption in the Bible

[paruskye]

1. the Quran says that allah sent the Torah and the Gospel but apparently allowed humans to change his Word? Two times???
2. If the Bible is corrupted then why do you use it to prove or legitimate Islam? If it’s corrupted then why you say oh this verse x and y talks about Muhammad if it isn’t true beforehand?

[MamadouTraore-omhh]

I would define corruption as adding, subtracting or changing the wording of a text.

[EngPheniks]

Revelation 22:18 “For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.”

[jhljhl]

If it's corrupt, where is the uncorrupted version?

[JULALAINE]

The reason why God sent His Son and the Holy Spirit because He knows that every thing on earth are corrupted. We have a guide.

[mrdon]

There are many proofs😂😂
Jay Smith also accepted that Bible has been changed.
Another Scholar accepts that the Writer of New Testament is unknown

[FreeRadical]

Al Nisaa 157, Allah communicates that those who believe the Christ was killed, follow nothing but conjecture. The farthest back I could track down this "corruption" claim, was nearly 400 years after Muhammad died his gruesome death, and prior to that Muslims "scholars" assumed the Quran and Bible were in harmony.

The website is now removed, but there was a Muslim blog site, and its author felt that since Allah said, in Quran 3:55, "Ya Isaa, inni mutawaffiqa ilayya..." meaning "O Jesus I am causing you to die and I will raise you to myself..." (The name Yeshua in Hebrew yields Yasou’ in Arabic, not Isa). This unique Muslim voice said Muslims who claim Jesus did NOT DIE, are all liars. Small wonder his site had such a short lifespan.
The battleground seems to be the verb tense of "inni mutawaffiqa", because common Muslim conjecture puts it in the future tense, Arabic speaking non-Muslims all say it speaks in the present tense, as Allah was explaining Jesus' death.

I've never seen such massive conjecture as Islam presents. Some of it's sad, others portions funny, some are dangerous to this entire planet.

He speaks in harmony with every non-Muslim Arabic speaker I ever heard in PalTalk, so it makes a difference whom we select as a teacher. Shall I rely on Islamic conjecture, a profligate messenger, and a god who gloats of his superior ability to deceive others? Why would I do that?

[eaf-target-xx]

Hello! Friendly Muslim here. I want to start by saying i know im 3 years late😂, BUT, i appreciate the respectfulness you show in this video, as its the only video of yours ive watched. Im not going to go to the go to’s of targetting trinity, or contradicting bible verses. Im more curious about the canonization. The canonization to my understand is the process which led to the bible having the 27 canons that it has today. Id also liie to state that i didnt go to muslim sources for my information, but rather stumbled upon a baptist church channel. Its my understanding that the first canonized bible had 23 canons. Today there are 27. I believe it was about 300 years after christ where we first got the 27 canons that christianity has today. From what i also understand, canonization was the process in which books were deemed authentic or forgeries. Please correct me if im wrong. That being said, to add or remove books would be edits done by men, correct? Theres one that stands out to me quite alot and thats the book of revelation. I dont remember the exact time frames. So i wont try to quote them and accidentally give misinformation, but from what i learned, for many years the book of revelations was identified as not being authentic, as not being attributed to coming from Jesus. At some pointC after being denied multiple times, someone came along and decided to approve it. Now, thats not my only point here. Thats just one that stands out to me alot. Over the course of time, multiple changes were made. The 27 canons that are had now werent always there from the first time. There were times where the 27 were changed by adding one and removing another. My question is, wouldnt that be corruption? Not the book of revelations its self, but the continuous changing of what books the bible contained? I apologize if i dont word this exactly how i intend to because im at work and rushing my question. Another question i have is wouldnt the most accurate version of the bible be the one closest to the life of jesus? If thats the case, the first completed bible canonization contained 23 books. Logically thinking, the further from the source we get while making changes, the less accurate it would be. As time went on, the bible progressed from 23 canons, to 25, to 26, to 27 and so on. At some points in history, i believe it went up to 28. Id gladly link the video in specific where i got this info if you’d like.