Why are the Laws of Nature so Consistent?

[sasquatch]

Love the new studio and the entire format. I look forward to an entire library of these videos.

[VictorFelipe]

This is great! Good to see how Todd Friel is open to welcome non-calvinist brethren on his show. God bless you all, brothers and sisters.

[Wimplo]

When I saw the thumbnail, I thought the editors were going crazy again, but then in the video he really is in the Wretched studio! 😂

[Armagn]

seeing Frank on Todd's set is just surreal!

[sunilthomassamuel]

Is it the studio of the Wretched Channel?

[onsenguy]

what proof is there that the "creator and sustainor" is the christian god?

[brianroberts]

OK Frank. You've convinced me. You're a fruit cake.
Once upon a time you used the precision of nature's laws to "prove" there is a god. The slightest deviation and the universe would collapse. Then you expect us to believe these laws can be suspended, (gravity - walking on water), without the universe being destroyed. Which is it?
Why not invite a well known atheist to give a 5min response to your pieces?

[mitchdaytonam]

I love that everytime Science makes breakthroughs, you religious nuts change the goalpost. 😂

[Jack]

A mind directing nature. Question, what created the mind that created the laws of nature? What created the mind that created that mind? Answer, Nature is not a creation, it is simply a set of "laws" by which everything is bound by. It is a fact, a fixed point of reality. In fact the very idea that a mind created a mind that created a mind that may or may not have created these laws means that the laws were always there, because if a mind created a mind it implies birth, life, death a concept that plays exactly to the letter the laws of nature. Its certainly an interesting question to ask. Any atheist that says, don't ask the question is neither a scientist nor a philosopher. But to say a mind created them, actually supports the theory they were not created. Whether it was the Big bang, God, a Simulation it will always bring about the question of what came before. Laws of nature have always existed, life is an anomaly. I suppose it depends on what you define as god. If you consider God to be some divine being i think you are mistaken. If you consider God to be an all encompassing force AKA laws of nature then i suppose you could argue God exists. God as a being, plays by the same rules as the rest of us. God as the very essence of reality, the laws of nature is simply just a word to describe those laws. Philosophy is so interesting.

[Sofia_LT]

Because a mind created it, it is so orderly, and it is so orderly, because a mind created it. It's circular logic and begging the question fallacy.

[uberdb]

"Why is there order?"

- Ooh good question, let's study and find out.

"I think the answer was God"

- No sorry, we've already ruled gods out as they're clearly imaginary.