The Bill of Rights | Constitution 101

preview_player
Показать описание
What is the #BillOfRights? What protections does it afford citizens? Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center, explores the influences that George Mason and the Virgina Declaration had on the Bill of Rights.

#Constitution101

This video is part of the NEW Constitution 101 course and curriculum.

This video is a part of the Khan Academy and National Constitution Center Constitution 101 curriculum.



Follow the National Constitution Center on social media!
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This should be required watching in every school

selvart
Автор

I love the lecture and learning a lot. I especially like that pause at 12: 37 and little smile at 14:19. Adds emphasis without really trying.

lisaschuttler
Автор

thats why I think the 9th amendment is the single greatest amendment added to the bill of rights. Just because it was not enumerated does NOT mean it is not reserved by the people.

markmanning
Автор

These are EXACTLY what I have been hoping for! This whole series of videos are perfect for assigning as EdPuzzle videos. The tone is spot on and there is just the right amount of detail. It may seem small, but the background is also just engaging enough for my high school students. Simply perfect. I cannot tell you how much these videos have benefitted my Civics & Government classes.

nealyoung
Автор

Excellent work and I hope it is available for everyone to enjoy and learn from.

janellenesbit
Автор

So, 1 very important question is ; how did it come to be that WE the people, of by & for which our U.S.A government was created & not the other way around switched with out consent ? I myself have 1 possible opinion as to why as well as others to lengthy to mention, is the lack of knowledge of the U.S A CONSTITUTION by WE, OF & for which A CONSTITITIONAL REPUBLIC rather than a DEMOCRACY came to be the form of the U.SA system of government.

davidstorrs
Автор

This is wonderful! I will be using this in my classes.

thomascourt
Автор

You missed the mark on the 2A a little bit. It was always an individual right and the Heller decision didn’t say that individuals can keep a handgun for self defense, it said The People have the right to have a handgun for lawful purposes, such as, self defense. It’s kind of a huge difference.

SGCXD
Автор

Was the English Bill of Rights a source for the American Bill of Rights? I read somewhere that two of the rights were direct lifts

europhile
Автор

Freedom OF religion
Freedom FROM religion

richardsimms
Автор

dude did he fart at 10:03. other then that lovely video. made me laugh at 10:03

claircrvus
Автор

James Madison George Mason Bill of rights

LoisMann-gu
Автор

I'm a fan of Madison, but I'm willing to go with 'James Madison, father of the Constitution of the United States and midwife of the U.S. Bill of Rights'. 😉

johnmccormick
Автор

Read Proverbs on “removing the ancient boundary stone”. Our “rights” are written-out-specific, inalienable, God-given Rights, to make it very unlikely that any “bad actor” might talk any Constitutional “lawmaker” OUT OF THEIR TRUE MEANING!! In our Founding Fathers’ understanding of their God, and MINE, we see throughout our Old Testament, and New, that GOD was SPECIFIC. The Founding Fathers followed suit and fostered all FREEDOMS from GOD, and THEY KNEW THEIR GOD, and HIS WORD in all its Complexity and Simplicity.

rochellecaffee
Автор

Remember kids, its 'We The People " vrs "we the people ". They must never win.

Stevexnycautomotive
Автор

Rights of humansss bodies and minds and communties… data and beyond. Privacy transparency and SpotOn oversight. Breathe… community and laws.

ryanweaver
Автор

"That all men are born equally free and independent..." What exactly does this mean coming from a slaveholder? Perhaps he defines "men" as male, white, Christian, property owners.

carpecanem
Автор

Pending SCOTUS 😅 independence day 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

RichardMizell-tf
Автор

Regarding “due process” expectations of a jury trial being “in the place of the alleged crime”, i don’t see as much necessity for that as much as it be in the general “region”, because we are so entwined in our knowledge and communications of what might concern of the voting public throughout the WHOLE country. I believe that the Founding Fathers thought that WITNESSES on either side, might serve to be more helpful in the area where they all lived. That, is my opinion is not a huge issue, anymore. But that is only my opinion “on the fly”. Suggestion, only. In those days, friends and family, and employers, and pastors, were called in to be “character witnesses”, and people who knew the accused well, and NOT PSYCHOLOGISTS!!

rochellecaffee
Автор

CON 101 because it’s a con to believe you have any rights in Rhode Island.

Poor_righteous_teacher