filmov
tv
Mining for Battery Minerals Will Destroy the Environment?! EV Myth #5 of 5
Показать описание
Use discount code EEROSIE to get 20% off tickets to Everything Electric Australia in Sydney February 9,10, 11. Come for the CARS! Stay for the HOME ENERGY, Stage Sessions, Micro-Mobility, Zero Carbon Kitchen & more!
Have you seen claims that EVs need so much mining they’re worse than petrol cars? Let’s dig beneath the surface to see the true story.
It is true that an EV needs six times the minerals in a petrol car, but that's just part of the equation. The main reason we're switching from internal combustion to electric vehicles isn't because of what they’re made of, but because of what they avoid: fossil fuels.
Take a typical petrol car. Over its lifetime, it burns around 17,000 liters of petrol. In contrast, an EV's battery metals weigh about 160 kg, a hundred times less. And the vast majority of battery materials are recyclable.
Even without recycling, EVs drastically reduce the need for mined materials. We're talking a 99% reduction compared to petrol cars! And of course we know from myth 3 that EV batteries will be recycled so it’s more like a 99.9% reduction when you factor that in.
There are extra greenhouse gas emissions for an EV relative to a petrol car that arise from mining and battery manufacture. So if you plan to buy a brand new car and never drive it, a petrol car *would* be the more climate friendly option. But if you are planning to drive that car, the difference is made up in about 20 thousand km based on our current electricity grid’s emissions, so after 1 or 2 years of average driving that’s less mining and less greenhouse gases for an EV compared to a petrol car.
The shift to EVs isn't about choosing lesser evils. It's about making a transformative leap towards sustainability.
Sources:
Have you seen claims that EVs need so much mining they’re worse than petrol cars? Let’s dig beneath the surface to see the true story.
It is true that an EV needs six times the minerals in a petrol car, but that's just part of the equation. The main reason we're switching from internal combustion to electric vehicles isn't because of what they’re made of, but because of what they avoid: fossil fuels.
Take a typical petrol car. Over its lifetime, it burns around 17,000 liters of petrol. In contrast, an EV's battery metals weigh about 160 kg, a hundred times less. And the vast majority of battery materials are recyclable.
Even without recycling, EVs drastically reduce the need for mined materials. We're talking a 99% reduction compared to petrol cars! And of course we know from myth 3 that EV batteries will be recycled so it’s more like a 99.9% reduction when you factor that in.
There are extra greenhouse gas emissions for an EV relative to a petrol car that arise from mining and battery manufacture. So if you plan to buy a brand new car and never drive it, a petrol car *would* be the more climate friendly option. But if you are planning to drive that car, the difference is made up in about 20 thousand km based on our current electricity grid’s emissions, so after 1 or 2 years of average driving that’s less mining and less greenhouse gases for an EV compared to a petrol car.
The shift to EVs isn't about choosing lesser evils. It's about making a transformative leap towards sustainability.
Sources:
Комментарии