How Far Can Russia's Artillery Actually Reach

preview_player
Показать описание
How Far Can Russia's Artillery Actually Reach

Subscribe Now :
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Soldiers win fights, Tanks win battles, Artillery wins WARS

SegzWithTedCruz
Автор

WW2 in Eastern Front featured mass artillery, including rocket one. 70% of German casualties on Eastern Front were to arty.

usun_politics
Автор

This presentation missed two important things:

1. The varieties of Russian artillery calibers are actually important. Russia has four different main artillery calibers. 100mm, 122mm, 152mm, 203mm. They all have different purposes. 100mm is meant for direct tactical local fire support, either from a defensive position or for shelling an enemy stronghold from a nearby height. 122mm is the main caliber used for supporting troop, movements, and suppressing enemy. It has a combination of long range, with great ammo capacity, and high rate of fire. This makes it the correct artillery for covering enemy forward positions for maneuver. 152mm is meant for hitting things further behind the enemy line, and also conducting continuous bombardment. It is not use so much tactically as The guns can have less ammunition due to the greater bulk and the range difference, and it was it to get past that front line into back areas as well as destroy structures and bunkers effectively. 203mm is a specialist seige and anti enemy artillery caliber. The cells have very long range and very large explosive loads so it can attack enemy artillery from outside of their response range, while still being safe away from the front line. This caliber is used for important, selective priority missions. Reason all this matters so much is because in the western armies, almost all all artillery is of the same caliber, 155mm and grants a very flat distribution of capabilities and also limits the ability of tailoring artillery to different tasks. Russian artillery is more flexible and has a much broader envelope of possible missions and environments it can work with.

2. It missed the 2S7 Pion, 203mm. This huge cannon exist for the purpose of destroying priority targets, deep behind enemy lines, as well as destroying enemy artillery supplies and anything else they try to keep protected. It is also extremely useful for counter battery fire as it can shoot from too far away to get hit back. Itslow rate of fire means it is only deployed very deliberately for top priority targets.

Mortablunt
Автор

80% of the casualities in the russo-ukrainian war are caused by artillery. Mercanaries have quit in tropes because of that.

szcynkowsky
Автор

People who underestimate artillery is underestimating history itself.

yukitakaoni
Автор

How is this even possible? We were told by BBC "Ukraine war: Russian reservists fighting with shovels - UK defence ministry" multiple times.

carlosorff
Автор

Who said RUssia has bad artillery don't know any history... LOL They bounced back in WW2 with better tanks that demolished Panthers and Tigers... We used their rockets to go in to space for some time.

Arty_McParty
Автор

Video creator mentioned Swedish Russian war but omited to mention that Sweden had invaded 1708 Russsia and lost war. Then again Sweden invaded again 1741 and got defeat again. Only this time Sweden had Western partners like Napoleon had. Russian kept Finland territory that was a part of Sweden. That part was called later on 1922 when Soviet Union had given back Swedish territory that Russian kept as a buffer to prevent any new Swedish future ivadsions. However, British had protested for return land back to Sweden and then was created new country today known as a Finland. That part of shameful Swedish history isn't in any Western democracies schools history books. After creation of new country of Finland Russian had put conditions with threaty that Finland become neutral in perpetuity to Never wage war against Russia. That thst threaty Finland never respected Finland joined Nazis Germany invasion of Russia 1941 then was called USSR/United Socialist Soviet Republic. Now Finland had again jioned US/NATO and have US/NATO bases in Finland Rassian borders. Russian should have kept Swedish territory/Finland forever so as Polish and Lithuanian multiple invasion of Russia. That Russian had forgiven then as a good neighbors. Now those Beck stubbeers have US/NATO bases on Russian borders. That parts of Polish and Lithuanian shameful history isn't in their school history books. Russian should've kept thires lands after Polish and Lithuanian invasion defeats. Now as we see back stubbers countinuing back stubbing over and over again Russia. Because Russian forgiven many devils invasions. Little factual history that isn't in any Western fake democracies school history books.❤️🕊️🌍👌👍

momcilopucar
Автор

The author, in addition to other types of artillery and MLRS, forgot a very important feature - Russian weapons, unlike Western ones, are designed for a long war and a huge number of volleys.

kirillsegkov
Автор

Nothing was said about Tornado-S. 120 km. Guided.

ldbsgjg
Автор

they still have the best artillery and the best ainti-air defence system, while USA put money into bases around the world and aircrafts ships, russia play the defence game in a cheaper but more reliable way. Is all about the economic war and USA is in bankrupt so a potencial war wont last long

chaiwa
Автор

Russia has a really good ratio betwean range price and wear of their weapons....
like Russian heneral once said....our weapons are made for real war

Lipi
Автор

The way they're using drones to make them into precision weapons is horrifyingly incredible

Galileo
Автор

I have served in a 120M mortar company. Shoot and scoot. The main problem was the weather. The atmospheric conditions that could affect the trajectory of the shells, but we had all kinds of charts for that.

TerraRubicon
Автор

the d30 is a great gun...the NVA used them in khe san against our marines...they respected that gun

willl
Автор

This is where Russia excells at. They love their artillery

danielmartin
Автор

Needed to include, but not limited to: TOS 1, 1A, 2, and the replacement of the Smerch, the Tornado S, with it's 120-150km range and guided rockets so not an "area weapon." The rocket systems have thermobaric warheads, not explosives, so they are horrifying, making the US ATACMS look like 90lb weaklings.

jeffreyspinner
Автор

There is also Gvozdika, a 122mm SPH both sides use. Shorter range compared to Koalitsya, but smaller and much more mobile...
Also, Pion 203mm is not mentioned (though in the vid) and heavy mortar Tyulpan 240mm. OK, TOS is designated as flamethrower...

ivanstepanovic
Автор

I experienced the artillery firsthand, It destroy you " mentally " before It destroy you physically!.

alroshan
Автор

Russia has better artillery than USA king of battle is artillary

isuplnm